The worst threat: weaponized biotechnology

The pandemic is the thing that has caused the situation that should predict. The bacteriophages can cause worse epidemics than we even realized. Those viruses can strike against the fungus that is delivering nutrients for vegetables. And that thing can cause the loss of food. If those funguses are destroyed the trees are starting to die. The idea of the phage virus infection is not new. The AIDS viruses are phage viruses that can infect the human immune cells. 

When we are talking about natural viruses they are more resistant to natural stress than artificial organisms. The thing is that the air is protecting people against HIV (AIDS) viruses because air molecules are destroying the surface antigens of those viruses. But the genetic engineering makes it possible to connect the genomes of the AIDS virus with bacteria or fungus. That means the bacteria will start to deliver those viruses. And that thing makes them more lethal than ever before. 

Things like bacteria that can change their form are interesting tools. They can deliver to the gasoline storage. And those organisms can change petroleum to lime. But the xenomorphs the transforming organisms are the most lethal surprises. 

There is the possibility that the hive will connect the genome that makes them produce poisons like botulinum. The idea is that the genome that produces botulinum will connect with the genomes of the hive or some other bacteria. And if that bacteria will lay on the mucous membrane that will kill the person immediately. This kind of organism might be under development in some underground laboratories. 

Biotechnology and the weapons of mass destruction are the most lethal combination in the world. The thing is that the deadliest viruses in the world, filoviruses like Ebola cannot transmit through the air because they cannot resist electromagnetic and chemical stress. So that's why the risks of those viruses are not realized. 

There is the possibility that genetically engineered bacteria are used as a transmitter of viruses. In this vision, the virus genomes are connected with the genomes of bacteria. So when the bacteria are delivered to the area they are starting to produce viruses. In this kind of scenario, the mass destruction will be complete. 

Image: https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/giant-long-lived-bacteria-could-make-microbial-farms-more-productive/4011137.article

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

One little point about nuclear weapons

 One little point about nuclear weapons

One thing, why NATO has been established is that the small Western European countries wanted that the nuclear weapons of the United States would protect them against Russia or the Soviet Union. The membership of that military alliance hoped to bring the nations under the Nuclear Umbrella. 

Then two European NATO countries the United Kingdom (1) and France (2) created their nuclear deterrence for their protection because they were afraid that the USA would not protect them against the Soviet Union and its allies. That thing delivered the pressure from the USA to other countries and the independent nuclear weapons of France and the United Kingdom highlighted the independence of the NATO countries. The United Kingdom was the first and it exploded its first fission weapon in 1952 and hydrogen bomb in 1956. 

France made its first fission weapon test in 1960 and the first fusion weapon test in 1968. Today the UK has the stockpile of 214 nuclear warheads and France has 300 nuclear warheads in storage. (1)(2).

In the Warsaw pact the only state, that had nuclear detonators was the Soviet Union. That thing was used as the propaganda weapon, and the thing was that the Soviet Union treated its allies by using nukes as the threat.  

In NATO those weapons are under the national command. So not a single nuclear detonator is not owned by NATO. 

NATO is the military and defensive alliance. It has not owned nuclear weapons under NATO military control. Three NATO states the USA, France, and the United Kingdom are states with national nuclear weapons. And this thing makes the role of NATO more problematic than we ever expect. 

Does that mean that what if the NATO troops would be lost conventional campaigns in Europe? What is the limit of the use of Nuclear weapons in that case? If NATO is under threat and outnumbered, that means that there would be also other nations than the USA, what would want to use nuclear weapons as the final change? And the thing is that what if the tanks of Russia would come too far, and the attack or campaign cannot be stopped? 

When the governments of the United Kingdom or France would start the nuclear attack against Russia? This kind of case would be possible if the USA would leave its allies, and some side would start the aggression. The nuclear policy is one of the most secretive things in the world, and if NATO loses its spine in the critical moment, the conflict can be started. And then the case is about the "limited nuclear warfare", what can expand to the global nuclear conflict. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

Image:

https://nypost.com/2019/05/10/radioactive-remnants-of-nuclear-bomb-tests-found-on-ocean-floor/

BIODECON and how it works with chemical agents

BIODECON and how it works with chemical agents

BIODECON is one of the most interesting ways to destroy chemical agents like VX and other chemicals from the environment. This method can also be used in the future to remove toxic waste from the ground, even if it would be not produced for weapon use. The chemicals that are used in BIODECON are not poisonous, which means that they can be used without a special protective suit, or it can be used to clean clothes, eyeglasses and other kinds of personal equipment, what have been contacted the chemical weapons. 

That system can be used in many cases when the chemical agents have used as weapons. This kind of research gives a very advanced and ecological way to destroy chemical weapons. The thing is that those chemical agents are poisonous, and there is needed many types of knowhow if we would want to destroy those weapons from the Earth. But the problem is that chemical weapons are cheap, they are brutal, and the casualties would not leave for feeding. And the use of those weapons gives an effective psychological threat in the mind of the enemy. 

Chemical weapons are prohibited in international laws, and that rises one very good question in the mind of people. Could it be possible that agents, who are working for the United Nations would slip in the bases, where is manufactured or stored chemical weapons, and destroy those weapons? 

That kind of question is very good to bring to the table because in many conflicts chemical weapons have been used. The reason why those weapons are prohibited is that modern military men have protective suits and resistant chemicals or medicals against those weapons. The protective suits are suitable against traditional chemical weapons like chlorine and phosgene. But against nerve agents must be used atropine. In this kind of case, those weapons would be effective only against civilians. 

But if the chemical weapons have been used, that means that the area must be cleaned very sharply, and if the used method also destroys military chemical there would not need to store or collect it anywhere. That would make cleaning action work effectively and also cleaning the area from chemicals would be faster. And the larger areas can be cleaned in a very fast period if we would compare this kind of cleaning to the case, where the poison chemicals would first collect to some kind of tank, and then some high-temperature system will burn it away. 

But there is one risk in this kind of effective cleaning chemical agent from surfaces by destroying the chemical structure of the molecule. That kind of chemicals allows destroying the evidence of use chemical weapons. In this scenario, some state uses chemical weapons in some area and then removes the chemicals from layers, for hiding the trace of the use of those extremely brutal weapons. And in the end, I must say, that the chemical weapons are brutal and dangerous things, which has a very big effect on the enemy, especially if they have no protective suits or protective medicals. The last ones are needed against the nerve agents.

https://www.helsinki.fi/en/news/science/biodecon-destroys-traces-of-chemical-and-biological-warfare-agents-equipment-and-vehicles-can-be-used-soon-after-an-attack

The plasmoid weapons and urban legends

The plasmoid weapons and urban legends

Image I

Strange detail in architecture might cause rumors. This thing is seen in one water tower in Southern Finland. That water storage is looking like UFO, and that thing causes that there are rumors and urban legends that the building is made for bait, that UFO:s would come to see it, and then the electromagnetic weapon would strike that flying saucer.

Of course, there are other explanations for this form, and Architect himself said that he got innovation or idea for this building from some TV-series.  Strange thing is that the system might be extremely effective and it can also be used as bait for the secret recon planes, and the electromagnetic systems what would be used in this project would be quite easy to build in secrecy.

The system could be installed in the regular looking house, and in the cellar would be built the high-power, high-voltage capacitor, and the electricity would conduct to the antenna, what might be masked as the satellite receiver. Then the water tower would install the other electric wire, and when the same frequency, but different polar radiowaves would touch, that thing causes electric arc in that point.

This system might be planned to capture UFO, and then there is no information, what kind of success that "project Stork" had. But when the system is created it can be used in many purposes. The thing is that when somebody or something would target and in that target would send the two, extremely thin radio waves, that targeted object would terminate immediately in intense heat.

The thing in this kind of technology is that it's quite easy to make. And when we are thinking about the radio transmitter as the weapons, the normal horizontal radio transmitters can create the radio aerosol or radio field. When the vertical radio wave would hit to a certain place, that thing would cause the effect, "where lightning comes from bright sky".

That kind of systems are extremely effective new kind of weapons, and they can be used as the replacer of nuclear weapons. If the plasmoid weapons are used the way, that the large area is covered by the cloud of ionized gas, that gas can, of course, deny the operating of the GPS and long-distance radio transmitting, because radio waves would not pass the ionized gas.

But if the ions would be near the ground, and there will be hit the radio waves, that will increase the temperature of the ions. That thing could be very destructive and very effective replacer for nuclear weapons. If the ion layer would hit extremely powerful radio wave that thing would increase the temperature in that area very fast, which means that the air will start to expand.

Image I

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haukilahden_vesitorni