Why this thing has kept out of publicity?

Why this thing has kept out of publicity?

And who cares, what kind of videos or something else things I watch on the internet? This is a good question when we are thinking about political influence in of the social and other kinds of media? The thing, what makes this kind of things very serious is that if we would get people, who will have certain opinions, and then follow the use of internet of that kind of people, we might make a thing, called action matrix of those people. And if this frame or matrix contains the data, what kind of things that kind of people are watching on the internet, that thing would help politicians to adjust the speeches, what they make for please a certain type of people.

The thing is that things like "Brexit" might be one part of the programs of speeches, what those people make, and also there are many other things, what is affecting the people, when they are choosing their candidate. This way to think is normal, and if we are thinking that something, what that person says has only the side role in the political programs.

But the politician can think that those same things are the main parts of the program in the parliament. This is a thing, what we do not mention very often, and the social media as the marketing tool for political agenda is quite difficult to deny. I know that the tool is effective when we are wanted to take clicks for some homepage, and the method is easy. We must just share links to the homepages, what we want to market.

And the links can be shared in the form "hey look at this", and in those cases, the person, who shares those links might collect a very big number of Facebook friends by sharing music videos, what is collected by using the matrix, what is collected by observing the use of internet of some people, who have certain opinions. Even if those homepages would be denied, that thing doesn't mean, that the data is so easy to deny. There is a possibility to make many homepages with the same contents, and that means that the data would be shared very effectively.

The thing is that Facebook and another kind of social media tools are complicated in the point of view of legislation. One of the most important things is that the members of political parties can anyway use the internet and social media as private persons. And the thing, what makes propaganda more effective than we ever think is the case, where people don't be told that they are looking at propaganda.

Here I use the word "propaganda" as the synonym for political commercials or marketing the political programs. The thing is that political marketing would be more effective if it is involved with some entertainment homepages, and what would you think if in the middle of some concert videos, would start the commercial film, where is played the election commercial of some politicians?

That thing is effective, but the more effective method is to use the discussion forum as the platform of political advertisement. First, there would be a couple of people would discuss some things, and then somebody shares thing, "hey there is a candidate in the election, who has that kind of opinions and go check that person homepages". That kind of thing is an effective way to connect many types of social media.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10996034

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

Here is one thing, when we must realize that we are adults, and probably some of those underage persons have even don't understand things, what they are saying or writing. But there is one thing, what might make some people suspicious, that there is something else than the teenager behind some social media accounts. And if the writings and talking would seem like some kind of press conference of Vladimir Putin, that would mean that somebody else uses that account.

Here we must remember that pedophiles are using the underage person identity in the net, and also hackers and propagandists are looking for the images of cute teenagers, and those images might be used in the account, what is used to benefit those peoples purposes. Sometimes I have imagined, did Zuckerberg even understand, what kind of rock that man put to roll when he started the Facebook. And today Facebook is the only solution and many other social media channels are driving past that solution, what was "the first".

Social media is a very big thing in the world, and also political campaigns can target by using the same method with normal marketing

There are many beautiful things in the case, and one of them is that Facebook grows a very powerful tool for many things, like mapping the political opinions of the users. And also it's powerful marketing equipment, which raises the value of his corporation. Today social media is big business, and there would be billions of dollars, what the marketing companies invest in those actors.

They are creating more effective algorithms, which can be used to make profiles of the people. The same algorithms can use to make the marketing profile of the user, but the same algorithms can be used to uncover the political opinions of the people, and the election campaigns can target to the certain audience same way with normal marketing campaigns.

In some scenario, the politician would just put the crosses in the squares of the form, and then the artificial intelligence would target the campaigns to the persons, who has similar opinions with this politician. This would increase the popularity of some politician. If a candidate would press the button, where reads that this person is strictly against foreign people, the artificial intelligence just selects people, who are against foreigners.

Those people are selected by using the words, what they are writing on Facebook, and that thing helps to find people, who have the same opinions with that politician. In fact, those algorithms can help that inmate to create speeches, what have the best influence on the audience. That means they can pick things from the information, which is share shared on social media, and find the things that are easy to solve by using political authority.

When we are thinking about the value and problems with Facebook is that if Zuckerberg would want to terminate that service, that man needs very much money, because it is used as the marketing tool, and those companies, what are using it as the communication and marketing tool might ask compensation about their work, what they have done in the world of algorithms.

Mobile devices are problematic because the person can push buttons accidentally

Those algorithms are used to collect the data about the things, what people are doing on Facebook, and those algorithms have problems with mobile devices. People are striking the "like" or "dislike" button accidentally when they are using Facebook by using mobile devices. But if the user listens to some song very often, what this person "dislikes" would that mean that the button is pushed accidentally. Those systems can collect data about the words, what people are using, while they are writing on Facebook, and if the words are positive that means that the thoughts about that thing are positive.

That kind of algorithms can also compile those words and clause structures with other accounts, and that thing would uncover persons political and another kind of opinions, and they uncover also if some texts are written by somebody else. Especially if this "somebody else" is writing on Facebook by using multiple accounts. That thing would rise those accounts in the close look of the moderators.

Psychological profiles can use to wrong purpose

One of the most horrifying problems of that profiling is that those profiles can uncover if the person is some kind of serial killer. This kind of data can misuse in many ways, and one is that data, what is collected from Facebook can use to track other that kind of persons, and if some criminal would know the "trigger", what makes that person make the horrifying things, that data can use to target the violence to certain person.

This means that using that data the person, who has necessary skills can use some psychopath as the "torpedo", who makes murders for that actor, and the thing, what makes those people extreme dangerous, is that they feel that they are making the right things when they are making murders for some mafia boss. The serial killer would not have a social conscience, and that means this person ever regret things what this person have done.

And if the profile of the user is made by using long term data collection, the artificial intelligence might notice, if there would be differences with the user, what began to use that social media account and the user, who uses that account in the present day. If the interests and words are suddenly changed, that might mean, the account is taken by some other user, who uses it without permission. Here I mean that using another person's identity in Facebook or any other social media channel is prohibited.

The world of social media and algorithms

The world of social media and algorithms

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/

We are living in a world with social media, do we want that or not

When I'm writing about Facebook in this text, I mean about social media. The problems with Facebook and data security is that when artificial intelligence is profiling the user for marketing it can also be used to create another kind of profiles. Data solutions that are used today are created for slower networks and in the begin of Facebook and other social media, the bandwidth of the networks have been less than 500 kilobytes, what made almost impossible to share images. The thing is that nobody even thought that someday almost every person has got the device, which allows sending the photographs and even movies to the Internet and what goes on the pocket.

That means this kind of things have not predicted when Facebook and another kind of social media solutions have been made. And another thing is that the algorithms, what are used for sorting data in the social media have been created for slower computers.

Modern supercomputers can sort billions of bytes more per second than some supercomputer in early 21 century. And the thing, what is new is that the data is transferring in the network. We are making more things on the Internet than before. When we are creating all our papers and memos on the net, we are in danger of hacking. But otherwise, we cannot lose those documents, while we are dropping our USB sticks. And we can continue to make those documents in every place, where we want.

The ability to filter data makes NSA so effective

The thing, what makes NSA so effective is that it has the capacity to filter information. That thing means that the computer can choose the data, what would send to operators by using multiple algorithms. One of the algorithms is the simultaneous calls to the telephone, which is owned by the known criminal. That means that the system can collect telephone calls and E-mails, which are interested in law enforcement. One of them is the E-mails between well known criminal and police chief.

Or the lawyer, whose spouses cleaning company would get millions of euros by cleaning offices, what are owned by Mafia. In the modern time, those officials must not listen to every tape and the computer would also use the "speech to text" solution for creating documents of those records. And the thing is that this kind of solutions is working as some kind of karaoke, which means that the judge can follow the tape like in some kind of karaoke happening.

In a couple of years ago, there were massive campaigns against social media. The attitude was that "companies have their own official channels, and the normal workers should concentrate on their work". But there is one thing, what made that campaign ineffective, and that is that it was made by the media, what has own cow in the ditch. The print media has problems with modern electronic media, and there was always one very big problem, and that is "what if the journalist writes racist or provocative writings?".

The second thing was that why people should be silent if they are harassed at the workplace? When we are thinking about social media, we can see things, what might feel very interesting. Almost every person, who is written in the social media are faced things, what is called "troll". Usually, that thing is like "fucking gay" type phrases, what are telling something about the way, how the harassed will think about things. Sometimes we are facing cases, that somebody has been used trolls for closing the social media.

There are millions of people, who have something to hide with their own backgrounds. And one of them is the unemployed person, who lives in Europe, but spends the winters in Hawaii. Those people would not want their friends to know about this kind of things. But there is another kind of cases, what might be very embarrassing, if they are uncovered. One of them is the priest or head of some charity campaign, who has been the head of the harassing in the school period.

Sometimes there have been suicides in that kind of cases and after that, the person has been changed the name and lived in the foreign land that everybody would forget that kind of things. But social media is a powerful tool for politicians, who are marketing their own ideas on how to improve society. But social media needs an active attitude, and that means that if a person would not have own thoughts, that kind of things is also uncovering in social media.

The social media account might be kept by somebody else

There are services, what are selling the social media writings, which means that the account is handled by professionals. And sometimes is claimed that some ice-hockey players have been burned about this kind of things. In those cases, the player has been written texts for social media, while that man has been on ice. I don't know if this true or false, but if this happens to the politician, that thing would be a little bit more embarrassing than in the case of the ice-hockey player.

In the social media have been uncovered things like that the person, who seems very emphatic and have been marketed very nice guy is something else. And there is also uncovered that some very nice looking kind person is total racists, who believe to be over everybody else. This is the problem with psychopaths and narcissist. They are looking like nice guys, but those persons have no social conscience. Those people are normally nicely dressed and polite, but they think always their own benefit.

One good mark to uncover that kind of person is that the psychopath wants to maximize own benefit. This means that this inmate always chooses the stronger side, and those persons are changing their opinion always to the side of the majority. Or actually, psychopaths are choosing the side, what gives that person the best benefit. And if some person offers the ice-hockey tickets for the psychopath, that person can be the side of the minorities, if that allows getting in the circles of the rich people, whose pictures they can show in the Facebook, what is suddenly filled with the selfies, what the psychopath portrays with the well known ice-hockey players . So this is the sermon for this morning.