What is the alternative explanation for the Brookhaven (Fermilab) observations?

The image above portraits the g−2 storage-ring magnet. That system Located at Fermilab. Originally researchers created that system for the Brookhaven g−2 experiment. The geometry allows for a very uniform magnetic field to establish in the ring. (Wikipedia/Muon g-2)

So what causes the interesting anomaly in the Brookhaven (Fermilab)low-energetic particle accelerator? The answer could be also a very weak gravitational effect. That turns the trajectory of the particle in the Muon g-2 experiment. If the fifth force is not existing could that thing that causes too strong curving in the Brookhaven laboratory be the gravitational wave of another universe? 

The thing is that the "fifth force" is much much weaker than the gravity. It's harder to see than other natural interactions. And there is the possibility that it's not even existed. But there is also the possibility that the scale of the "fifth force" is extremely large. 

Maybe it's visible only in the interactions of galaxies. Or maybe we could see the effect of this mystery from outside the entire universe. There is the possibility that the fifth force is not seen inside the universe because its form is a monotonic hum. In that case, we cannot see the changes of that force. 

Or if the effect of the fifth force can measure only between extremely large entireties that means we cannot see that thing. The other interactions are covering the fifth force. 

So another explanation why the mysterious "fifth force" is hiding is this: because the force is stable there is a problem with how to measure it. The "fifth force", if it exists is a similar wave-particle duality with other forces. 

But let's go to business and try to find out why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN has not seen the same things. Those are observed in the Brookhaven laboratory? The reason for that is simple. The LHC uses too much energy. And that means the weak interactions are not able to affect the trajectories of those particles. The Brookhaven laboratory uses much smaller energy loads than the LHC. And the weaker forces can affect the trajectories of the particles that are traveling in the accelerator of the Brookhaven laboratory. 

So if we are trying to compile why the Brookhaven accelerator is more suitable for observing weak natural interactions than the LHC we can use bullets as an example. The side wind would have more effect on the slow-flying bullet than the fast bullet. The reason for that is that the frontal pointing movement energy is higher in the fast-moving bullet. 

The wind effect of the slow-moving bullet is higher and the outcoming interaction like gravity wave is acting like the wind in the case of the bullet. At the first friction must slow the speed of the bullet so slow that the sidewind can push it out from the trajectory. 

The slow-moving low energetic particle is easier to push out from the trajectory than the fast-moving particle. The particle's speed in the LHC is near the speed of light. And the weak wave movement effect to so fast particles is harder to observe than the similar effect to the lower energetic and slower-moving particle. That's why Brookhaven laboratory sees anomalies that are not able to be seen by the LHC. 

()https://astronomy.com/news/2020/03/the-fifth-force-what-is-it

()https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-measure-the-magic-fine-structure-constant-20201202/#comments

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

X-37B has been in space for over two years

X-37B has been in space for over two years

Top Secret shuttle orbiter of USAF has been at space over two years, and the question is why this shuttle is so secret? Of course, it can be used for the material research, and the thing is that inside its cargo bay could install the manipulator hands, which makes it a really good platform for research.

But if we would want to create the remote-controlled laboratory in the orbital trajectory, we can shoot simple the cylinder-shaped satellite, what can be empty rocket stage, what is equipped with the remote-controlled equipment. And if we would use Falcon-9 or Falcon Heavy-type of rockets for that purpose, we might have a more sophisticated system than in some extremely small shuttle. 

The stage would be launched to LEO (Low Earth Orbiter) and then the auxiliary stage would be connected to it, and then that laboratory would push to the higher trajectory. That kind of laboratories has a bad reputation because they can test dangerous organisms without fear of infections. So the thing is that X-37B is a little bit too small for the space laboratory, and the normal satellite-looking device could do its missions. But the thing what makes that small shuttle interesting is the reason, why it spends so long time in space? 

That kind of programs are not made for anything, and there must be some kind of reasons, why this shuttle is made, and why it is top secret? The thing in that kind of operations are expensive, and there is another thing in remote-controlled shuttles. They all look like each other. When we are thinking about X-37B there is something, what somebody doesn't want people to know. So we must start to think about the purpose of this strange spacecraft. 

One thing is clear, this vehicle is a so-called "grey" project, which means that it is public, and the body of this shuttle is public. There are images on the net, but every technical detail of it are classified. So X-37B can be used as the next-generation cruise missile, or so-called HCM (Hypersonic Cruise Missile), which means that it's cargo bay would be equipped with a small-sized nuclear weapon. 

When the threat of war is increasing, that shuttle would launch to the orbiter and its standby for the attack. When the threat is over, it can return to base. It means that it could be used the prototype of the new refundable warhead carrier, what can send to the orbiter for fast operation. But it would be suitable for ASAT missions, which means that it can be equipped with rocket weapons. 

X-37B kind of system can also carry a telescope, which can be used for multiple intelligence missions. That shuttle is more suitable for those roles than some kind of flying laboratory. But of course, it can be used to test structures for long-term space operations. When we are looking at the other possible role of this shuttle, that could be the "frontman" for the thing, that USAF and CIA just have that kind of devices.

That means that there could be other small shuttles, which are using STEALTH-technology. And X-37B is meant for cover-up device, what purpose is to hide secrecy, if some worker of those projects would accidentally tell something about those shuttles, what might have multiple usages. So we are waiting for the next information on this system.

https://yle.fi/aihe/artikkeli/2019/09/27/yhdysvaltain-salainen-avaruussukkula-on-ollut-jo-yli-kaksi-vuotta-avaruudessa

Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

When we are talking about fission reaction, we must remember that depends on the point of view, who created the first nuclear reaction. If we talk about self-sustaining nuclear fission the man who created that reactor in the Cigaco University was Enrico Fermi and the man who first split atom was Erns Rutherford. And Fermi benefits the work, what Rutherford made when he manufactured the first nuclear reactor. The thing what has sometimes introduced is to split some non-radioactive element like lead by bombing those atoms by using very high-speed electrons or ions.

This kind of technologies has seemed useless, and only material what could replace uranium in nuclear reactions could be thorium, and the idea is that the thorium atoms would bomb the high-speed ions during that reaction, and that technology is under study in many countries. Rutherford created an idea of a fusion reaction. When we are thinking about that era technology, the self-sustaining reaction was impossible, and the success means in this case that a couple of atoms could be connected.

In ITER homepage is mentioned that Rutherford along with his assistant Oliphant connected tritium Atom to Helium, but two atoms are not made fusion power. But there is a possibility that the fusion can be created by using particle accelerator. In that theory, the particle accelerator would shoot the ions in the chamber with very high power, and then that would make those particles melting together.

If the ions have different polarity, they should go together because of the magnetic pulling effect, what should make the use of fusion fuel more effective. But there are any problems with this kind of fusion reactors. The idea is to shoot ions by using "Y"-shaped structure of particle accelerators, where two tracks of accelerators what will accelerate the particles what have different polarity to the single point of the structure.

There have been introduced the theory that compiling two elements lead (element 58) and bismuth (element 33) by using fusion could create moscovium (element 115), what is claimed to produce in some places like AREA-51. There is another reaction in the Wikipedia page, which tells about this element. In this hypothetical reaction, the ions of the lead and bismuth will shoot together by using linear accelerators, and the moscovium would give extremely high power in the lightweight nuclear reactors.

We know that the moscovium is existed, but is there some effective and economical ways to produce so much about that element that it can be used in some kind of nuclear reactors. The half-time of moscovium is extremely fast, and that means that the element must be stored in the place, where are absolute zero points or zero Kelvin temperature what might slow the half of that material.

Or another version is to store that material in the particle accelerator, where it would accelerate to the speed, what will be near the speed of light, and that thing would slow the time in that material. But there is no evidence that this kind of systems has been tested in some places, except Bob Lazar statements, that he was working with the element 115 in AREA-51. But that man has not believed until the existence of element 115 has been confirmed.

The writing about the way to make science

The writing about the way to make science

I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.

One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.

Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.

The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.

But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.

If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.

We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.

And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.

The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.

If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.