The writing about the way to make science
I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.
One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.
Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.
The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.
But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.
If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.
We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.
And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.
The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.
If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.
I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.
One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.
Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.
The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.
But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.
If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.
We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.
And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.
The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.
If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.
Comments
Post a Comment