Are gluons the wave movement that surrounds the superpositioned and entangled quarks?

The model of superpositioned and entangled particles

Gluons are the elementary particles when they are out from protons and neutrons. But the wave-particle duality means that it is also the wave movement. So could the form of gluons the wave movement when they are inside the proton and neutron? 

Wave-particle duality means that all particles are also particles and wave movement. First, that ability was seen in photons and the light was proven to have particular and wave movement forms. But then the wave-particle duality proved to be a universal phenomenon that happens in the quark-size world. 

The thing is that things like quarks and electrons can turn to wave movement and particles don't mean that any other things other than elementary particles can turn to wave movement and back. The reason why the proton cannot travel through the black hole. Is that the black hole will separate its quarks away from the structure. But quark an electron can make that thing because they have no sub-particles inside them. 

Protons and neutrons are the particles that are forming of the quarks. And between quarks are traveling mysterious particles called gluons. Gluons are the things that keep quarks in form. The question is could it be possible that gluon is more wave movement than some kind of particle. Could it be possible that the gluons are traveling inside the protons and neutrons by the form that is like "8"? That could mean that the gluon is the power field that is traveling between the superpositioned and entangled particles. 

If the gluon is the power field or bite of wave movement that acts like the wire that connects particles called quarks together. That thing would explain why protons and neutrons are splitting. When those quarks are rotating inside that quantum wire they are delivering wave movement through the quantum space.  So the thing that makes the proton and neutron disappear is the quantum friction. That thing causes the wave to move away from that thing. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

When the energy stress to the structure ends. The particles release the extra energy as radiation.

That radiation burst pushes particles away from each other. And that is the thing that breaks structures. 

The extremely powerful radiation can destroy even the neutron star. The idea is that the high-energetic radiation burst is hitting the neutrons that thing loads them with energy. And when the energy is released the energy radiation will push those neutrons away from each other. The idea is that the neutron star turns to the extremely high-energetic neutron bomb. 

Neutron radiation is released in two stages. First, the neutrons are delivering electromagnetic wave movement. And if that wave movement is strong enough it pushes the neutrons out from the structure. 

The hitting energy load would not break the neutron structure. The moment when the radiation is breaking the structure. Is when the energy load is ended and the particles are delivering the extra energy away. This is one of the things that we must realize when we are talking about energy and how it affects particles. 

If we are thinking that the energy load that is targeted to the object is positive energy. And the energy that comes out from the object is negative energy we must realize that the energy that travels in one direction is not breaking structures. But when the direction of the energy is turning that is the thing that breaks the structures. 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars?

In this text, I will think about the origin of the material. Not how the man got the intelligence. 

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars? The answer to the question depends on the timeline that we are handling. If we think that the history of the material starts in the particles that formed just after the Big Bang straight from the wave movement. 

We can say that subatomic particles that form the protons and neutrons are much older than atoms in our body. Electrons formed also after the Big Bang. And the electromagnetic forces along with microgravity they positioned to orbit protons and neutrons. 

This question is interesting. Every single atom in our body is formed in the nuclear reactions in the stars. Or the hydrogen atoms are formed in the quantum plasma just after the big bang. But are we children of the black holes and neutron stars? The heavier elements are formed in the extreme heat in the largest stars. 

And some of the most extraordinary elements are formed during supernova explosions. Only when the blue giant star is exploding. The energy level rises to the level that forming of the heaviest natural elements are forming. That will explain why the heaviest isotopes are so unusual things in the universe. 

The answer to the question are we children of explosive stars or maybe black holes are not simple. Supernovas, neutron stars, and black holes are creating giant waves around the universe. So those waves are causing a disturbance in the entirety. And that thing means that the material is starting to pile up at the point where the particles have more mass than in other places. 

But otherwise, the history of material is starting just after the Big Bang. And the forming of the material started a long time before the first proton or hydrogen atom formed. The quarks that formed protons and neutrons formed just after the Big Bang. And there were particles which origin was in the wave movement that came to the universe from the Big Bang. 

Image II: The standard model of elementary particles

So there was something that made the quarks forming the protons and neutrons. Sometimes one of the things that caused the piling up of the quarks is introduced Pauli's exclusion principle. Pauli's exclusion principle means that there are no two identical Fermions in the universe. Originally Pauli's exclusion principle went like this: The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle which states that two or more identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) cannot occupy the same quantum state within a quantum system simultaneously. 

And the universe can think of as the sum of all quantum systems. The size of the universe was smaller just after the Big Bang. So that means there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle affects at least the entirety of that smaller universe. And there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle shows off even today. The thing is that even if we cannot measure something that thing can be existing. 

Quarks are fermions. So there is no need for modification for that principle. And the thing that makes the difference between those particles is the energy level. Ao the more energetic fermion is heavier and that means it pulls another fermion together. Pauli's Exclusion Principle could be the key to born material. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

The image I:()https://lsc.org/news-and-social/news/join-us-live-for-the-astronomy-of-2021-jan-7-at-5-pm

Image II:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Is there a slight object that exists in the Universe?

Is there a slight object that exists in the Universe?

When we are thinking about the size of the quantum world, we are talking about the smallest possible particles in the universe. Those particles are quarks and something that is forming the quarks, and that means that there is the thing, what is known as the super spring, what is the border form between the wave movement and real material. We don't know are super springs material or wave movement, and if they are wave movement, what is the thing that moves? This kind of thing is fascinating things because they are important in the world of quantum mess.

So is there a slight particle in the universe?

Neutrons and protons are formed by three quarks, and the question is do those quarks form small size bubs in the protons and neutrons? Also, we might ask, do the super springs cause the small canyons on the surface of electrons? These kinds of things seem to have no mean because those forms are extremely small, and the fast spin or the rotation movement of the particles will turn over the effect of those possible bumps, which are only hypothetical things.

The thing is that this kind of thing might have a bigger mean than we even want to know. The thing is that a fast-rotating particle can cause the electromagnetic turbulence in the electromagnetic fields of the atoms and space, which is between electrons and the nucleus of the atom. And this kind of electromagnetic whirl is probably one of the most interesting things in the universe.

Large whirls are forming the universe.

The thing is that the electromagnetic whirls might be the origin of the giant whirls, which are forming galaxies. This thing might seem very far from real life, but there is one thing, that makes this kind of theory and ideas interesting.

The thing is that the universe itself is an absolute stable formation, and if there would be forming whirls in that gas mass, those whirls are making a similar thing, which is the base of chaos theory. When the butterfly would flap their wings near the equator over the sea, that means the solar energy would cause the rising of the power of the whirl, and that means that this effect is causing the formation of the tropic hurricanes.

Of course, the whirl would get energy from the rotation movement of Earth. And if there is no landmass, the friction would not face resistance, and this makes the forming of hurricane possible. The thing is that standing swirl is the most dangerous effect in the atmosphere. The energy would make it a very powerful and dangerous vortex.

In the atmospheres of gas planets, that kind of tropic winds can continue theoretically forever. The low temperature and the form of the gas are causing that the friction is extremely low. But there is one of the most fascinating theories in the world, and that is that if the atmospheres of the gas planet would get ledge, that thing can cause the whirl, which can grow the size of the entire galaxy.

That whirl would get its energy from the billions of stars, and of course, the material is very thin, which makes that thing very large, but mostly harmless phenomenon, what can cause the forming of stars.

The quantum gravity as the source of antigravity

The quantum gravity as the source of antigravity

Quantum gravity can open the road to real antigravity.

When we are thinking about real antigravity, what would be created by using quantum gravity, we might think that thins kind of thing could be something, what we cannot do. But in fact, the antigravity is possible, if we would turn the gravity to operate the opposite way. And how we can do that thing? The idea is that we could think the singularity could answer that kind of thing.

So, in this case, we could make the wormhole, what is smaller than the nucleus, and then turn it to "U"-shape. The distance between the begin and the endpoint could be very close, and this thing can make possible to create the levitation. This thing means that the entrance to the wormhole would be close to the exit of this tunnel, and if there is another but a lighter black hole, that thing would make possible that the material would move to one direction in the wormhole, and if that thing would be below the craft, it would raise it to air.

"U-shaped singularity could theoretically turn gravity to its opposition.

But there is another way to make those black holes. They could be opposite sides of the craft, and that thing allows them to levitate craft between them. And there are many problems with those things, and the smallest is not to create the singularity. The thing is that the energy pumping to the quarks would make possible to make this no-balanced wormhole, which can oppositely turn gravity.

There is also the third possibility, and that is by creating a very high-mass gas atom, the thing could also operate as the crane, which can raise objects. There is one thing, what sad thing in quantum gravity. And that is that this technology can cause as the most devastating weapon, what history has ever created.

The thing is that singularity is a black hole. And even if it cannot pull the atoms inside it, it can pull gas molecules and atoms together. That means it can detonate the fusion weapon or form the nitrogen fusion in the atmosphere. This kind of thing can risk the future of the entire planet, and in the last case, the fusion can cause the growth of a black hole. Even that thing would exist only a  couple of seconds, that thing can pull the entire planet through it. And the explosion of the erupting black hole would be very big. But the short term singularity can curve entire warships.

Quantum gravity would make possible to create the most deadly weapons in the world.

The synthetic gamma-ray bursts, what can be created by nuclear-powered X-ray lasers would allow creating the small size black hole. That thing can cause the creation of singularity if the black hole is adjusted with some other black holes.

One of the most exotic ideas, that quantum gravity has caused in the field of the military is that the drone would somehow form the singularity between the laser and enemy command center. That singularity can be used to send high-power laser impulse to that target, but how the drone can do that thing.

The idea is to use the nuclear-boosted X-ray-laser for creating the extreme energy load, which is targeted to that drone. In the middle of this drone is the perfect ball-shaped glass ball. And when the high-power X-ray impulse would hit the drone, that thing will turn the glass ball to singularity, and the system can adjust the black hole by giving radio-wave bursts to that thing.

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Are dark energy and dark material the same thing?

The dark energy is one of the mysterious things in the Universe. And sometimes the creation of dark energy is explained that the spin of quarks is causing the thing, what is known as dark energy. The free quarks would be the dark material in this very interesting theory, which could explain part of the dark energy and dark material.

Sometimes we are thinking that the dark energy and dark material are the same things, and this means that we should call those things "Dark stuff" or ether. But we don't know are those things the same thing, and that's why we must say that those things are dark matter and dark energy, and they are one of the most interesting and fascinating things, what are seen in the Universe.

Is dark material free quark, what spin forms dark energy?

There are two theories about the form of dark material and dark energy, another is that thing is forming by the particles, what is something like free quarks or some other thing, and second theory is that thing is free to wave kind of movement in the thing, what we are calling Universe. And that means that the dark energy is like some kind of radio waves, but that thing is too quiet to notice by using radiotelescopes.

So could the dark energy be only the very low energic radiowaves? And then if we are thinking that the dark energy is so-called free wave movement in the Universe, the next question is, what is causing that wave movement, or what moves in that wave movement. And the thing, why the form of the dark energy and dark material is interesting is that is it possible that there is a small particle in the Universe, what is in the border between energy and material?

Could there be some kind of particle that works as a "gate" between energy and material?

And if we could find that thing, we must realize, that this hypothetical particle could be the thing, which helps us to turn the energy to the material. That kind of thing is a fascinating thing, and we know that there is theoretically possible to turn the energy into the material because we can turn the material to energy. But how we can do that thing? That is the thing, what is the problem with the mirror-effect, what could revolutionize everything. The thing is that we haven't made any single of these kinds of successful tests.

If the dark energy would be some kind of very low energic radio waves, that thing means that the dark energy would not affect the small particles at all. That means that even the largest stars would not affect by the dark energy, because of their energy production would cover that effect. But the extremely large entireties like the intergalactic molecule clouds the dark energy would affect. Those molecule clouds are extremely thin, and those forms are extremely stable.

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

We could form this question in the form, "why scientists are looking for more and more smaller and high energy particles in the Universe"? Why we are creating more and more powerful systems, what can find smaller and smaller particles. And maybe we would someday find the point, where energy would get the "astral form", and that is the opposite for the form of quarks, and we can think that the physical form of atoms, electrons, and other fundamental particles is so-called "kinetic" or "crystallize", and the form of energy would be "quantum fog" or "astral", so sometimes somebody has asked, "is the material only the crystallized energy".

And annihilation reaction, where antimatter and matter would contact and all of their mass turn to energy are supporting that thing. So the material is only the kinetic version of energy, if we want to say this thing like that way.

The idea of those people is that they want to find the point, where the material is transforming the energy and the opposite way. If we could find out that point or gate, where the energy is turning to material, we could find something bigger than ever before. We know that somewhere in the quantum world is the extreme particle, what is turning to the energy, and if we would see that particle, we can simulate the opposite reaction. But what is the form of that particle?

Is it stable or is it like some kind of quantum version of "the elastic bound", what can move to another space and form to another? That would be the most interesting particle of the quantum Universe, what we can ever create, or rather saying, what we can ever find. Then we are facing another strange particle and that is gluon. That particle keeps quarks together, and sometimes the form or essence of the gluon is thought to be a key to see, what things are forming the quarks.

When we are thinking about the thing, what is called the "super spring", we must ask, is that thing the particle, what is mentioned at the beginning of this text. So if our super spring is the quantum version of elastic bound that means that this particle is like clew, what the super spring forms. And if that clew, what has name quark, would open, the super spring would slip to energy. And that thing would be very interesting.

So what would we need to observe this kind of case? The thing is that those super springs would not act like other fundamental particles. That makes problems for creating observation of those particles. So what kind of thing the "super spring" would be? The thing is that if the form of this thing is the wire, we must think, the reason, why this wire would turn to the clew and form the quarks?

Is there a tiny electric force, or force what effects a similar way with electricity, and pulls the wire to ball? And what is the role of gluons in that process? Are gluons some kind of small black holes, what can turn the super spring in the shape, what we are known as quarks? Those are things, that are waiting for answers in the thing, what we are known as material.

And then we must understand that we see material everywhere, but we don't know much about it or it's the deepest form. What is the point, when the material turns to energy or is there the final form, or is the material acting like melting crystal? This kind of thing is interesting when we are starting to research the final particle between material and energy.

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.

When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.

That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.

In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?

The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.

What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.

But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.

When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.

The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.

In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.

The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.

But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.

So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.

The lasers and resonance,

The lasers and resonance

Lasers would be the most dangerous things in the world

The thing, how lasers would affect the material, is that it will pump energy to the target, and that makes the atoms oscillate or resonate. The thing is that the laser would send the coherent wavelength radiation to the target, and the wavelength would be ordered by the material, what is used in the laser-tube. And the biggest effect of that radiation would be the atoms, what are same size as the atoms, what is sending the radiation. In fact, the radiation would become from the electron core, and that would be lucky for us.

But there is a possibility, that the lasers would influent to the nucleus of the atoms.  So if we would want to create the extreme powerful lasers, we can use pure protons or hydrogen ions to make that laser ray. In this case, the electron of the hydrogen atom is removed, and the ions are in the magnetic tube, which will keep them inside the magnetic field.

Theoretical solutions like hydrogen-ion lasers and quark-lasers can be extremely powerful if we can create them some day. 

When those ions would target the electromagnetic radiation, the protons start to send the laser ray in the same way as the case, where is used normal atoms. But In this case, the laser radiation would influence straight to protons in the nucleus of the atoms. That would crush the nucleus immediately because the protons would start to resonate. And the effect would be really devastating.

So what could be the real-life "mister laser"? The answer is simple, the quark lasers, what would use the quarks, what are separated from the neutrons, are giving the radiation, what would crush neutrons. And if we think the military forces, it's lucky for the human race, that we have not created a way to separate the stable quarks from the neutrons or protons, because that kind machines would be real-life doomsday weapons in the wrong hands. 

Is time an illusion?

Is time an illusion?

1. What is the form of time?

Sometimes physics and other people are asked the definition of the time, and sometimes they got an answer, that time is a form of energy. The idea is that when the particles are forming, the protons start to rotate, and this rotation is called "spin".

This rotation would lose the energy or forces, which keeps the particle of atoms together, and also the spin would cause that at the last the quarks, what are forming protons and neutrons are released. This thing has been proven, when the particles protons and neutrons are broken. This is the physics explanation for the thing, what is called time.

2. The energy is stable in the Universe

Sometimes people think that if we would target the electromagnetic radiation to atoms, we would make them exist forever. That thing is possible for a small group of atoms.  But the thing is that the energy is not forming, it's transferring from the place to another. There is a stable mass of energy in the Universe, and the energy is only changing its form.

It can be in the form of material, radiation or particles like electrons and quarks. And it can turn to another form. But if we want to make our universe live forever, we must open a wormhole to another dimension, what brings energy from outside. This kind of things might be the problem of the civilizations, what lives in the distant future.

3. What is the physical time?

The end of the time would be the situation, where the energy of the atoms will end. The atoms get energy for keeping the electrons on their trajectories from the outer source, and if that radiation emission would not exist, the atoms would start to break, because the rotation of electrons and the spin of those particles causes that the atom would finally break. And at least the spin of quarks is ending, which means that even the particles of the atoms would not exist.

Or actually, they exist, because there is the law in nature, what denies that material cannot vanish. It can turn to energy, and when we are thinking about the situation, that the final star and black hole is broken, those particles would exist in the form of energy. The level of the energy is so low, that it is almost invisible, but the energy exists. But if we are thinking about the time, we must find some other explanation for the thing, what makes us older.

4. Are telomeres the reason, that we are believing the time

Telomeres are small parts of the chromosomes, and they are getting shorter in each time when the cell is dividing. Those things would cause the aging process of the living organisms, and that might cause the illusion of the time. But there is a thing, what makes time very interesting phenomenon.

There is one idea, what would make the species of the distant future save the universe when the material ends. That thing is open the wormhole to some other dimension for bringing the energy from outside to this dimension, and that might save the universe.

We cannot live without time, and we can meter that thing by using a clock. So there would be the idea, that the time is the virtual force, which means that we can meter that thing, but it does not exist. And that has brought the idea, that the time is only decreasing the energy level in the Universe.

. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME3sjezuckE