Showing posts with label productive thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label productive thinking. Show all posts

Monday, December 2, 2019

Can computers steal your memories?




Can computers steal your memories?

The computer has not own will

In this text, I will use the words "computer wants" and at the beginning, I must say, that the computer itself doesn't want anything. If the computer would kidnap some people, it makes that thing, because the program inside it would translate it's codes that it must trap somebody, and that means that the computer itself doesn't make mistakes.

Every mistake, what computers make are made by programmers. So if the computer would be programmed to require some kind of identification, while a person would go through some gate, it would close everybody who has not that mark outside. Same way if the computer, what is connected to the robot is programmed to take the fingerprint from every person on the street, the robot would follow the orders and make that thing. Robots ever apply for orders, what they get.

They do exactly, what the programmer would do, without caring about the things like how much trouble the order would cause. And this thing makes computers very effective for things as military actions. In that world, the actor must do exactly what superior would say, and they must not apply anything. But if the opponent would break the algorithm, it can predict every movement, what the opponent will do.

This makes difficult to make programs for autonomous drones

And this is the thing, that makes the creation of the autonomous drone very difficult. When the opponent would learn, how the drone moves, when it's under attack, shooting down of that thing would be quite easy if the opponent would know, what direction the drone would turn.  Have you seen the movie "Tron"? In that movie, the hero would be trapped in the computer memory. But could that thing be possible in real life? Could computer copy our mind or thoughts in its memory, and turn them to part of it? And why it would make that thing?

The thing is that if the high-power radio wave would travel through the human brains, it would start to oscillate with the same amplitude with the electricity of the nervous system if the frequency of the radio wave is the same with the electricity, what travels in the nervous system, and that electromagnetic radiation can be detected by using normal radio receiver. The system can also use highly targeted radio ray, what can go through the pineal gland, and that thing can be used to record the electric phenomenon of the pineal gland. This organ has been connected with abstract thinking and imagination.

What if computers steal our imagination and ability for abstract thinking?

So the computer steals our imagination. And this is why computers would do that thing, and record the electric phenomenon of the nervous system. They need our productivity. The human being is the only organism on our planet, which has the ability to abstract thinking. And productive thinking is the ability to transform the abstraction to the image on the paper, or ability to create the plans and construction orders from the mind. And this is the thing, why computers would need humans.

Even the most intelligent and advanced artificial intelligence is hopeless if it cannot produce new things. And the thing is that artificial intelligence cannot create anything new. Computers are playing chess better than most of the people, but do you know, why chess is used in the tests of artificial intelligence? In the real world, chess has quite a limited gaming area and strict rules. This makes the programming the chess program quite easy if we want to compare that process with the process, where the computer must drive the car in traffic.

Why computer is better chess-player than we are?

The thing that makes artificial intelligence so effective chess-player in the world is the capacity to calculate things very sharply. It can calculate tens or even millions of ways to move the buttons on the chessboard, and it can make gaming models by using those calculations. In this case, the actions of artificial intelligence base the idea, that there are multiple models of the game stored in the memory of the computer, and it would select the best, what is possible in that case.

Why a computer cannot operate that way in everyday life. While the car is driving in traffic, in that environment it is strict and clear orders, but there are many things, which are called "surprising variables". So if we are programming the computer to follow traffic lights we must remember, that some people might have a red or green skirt, and that's why the system is extremely hard to program. And traffic is a really good example of the environment, where the reality is away from stimulations, models, and theories.

But if we would want that robot would make the same things, what we are doing in everyday life, that kind of thing would be too hard to make, because for that thing is needed so many models, that we cannot create them all, and how many programmers would even know them all? What kind of things would a person do, while going to shop? When we would think the case, that computers would want to make some kind of designs, that thing would turn really difficult.

What if computers could benefit the brain waves during the creation process?

So what if we want to make a computer or artificial intelligence, what designs the building, we must understand that the reason, why architects are hired is the please the customer. So how a computer can please its customer? The answer is simple, the brainwaves are telling, does something please the person, who is sitting in the front of the screen, and then the computer can start the creative process.

That process is based on the methodology, where the computer would use simple forms like triangle, square and circle at the beginning of the process. And then the computer would put more and more details in the image. During that process, the system would follow the EEG of the customer, and then it can select the forms and things, that would please the customer. In that case, the chair would have the radio-transmitter behind the head of the person, and the radio receiver would observe the changes of the EEG, what would be moved to that system.

Of course, the system would need data about the formulas and other rules for buildings of that area, but the solution might satisfy every customer on Earth because the EEG would uncover if we like or dislike something. But this kind of thing is the vision of tomorrow. And maybe someday the artificial intelligence would create buildings and act in development missions.

Image:

https://www.houseofbots.com/images/news/2704/cover.png


Wednesday, November 13, 2019

The skull and pipe

The skull and pipe

In some paintings, death smokes a pipe, and there are three ways to think about that thing. Or I have seen one painting or woodcut, where death has portrayed while that horrifying character is sitting and smoking. Does that mean that tobacco causes cancer? In the modern time that thing would mean that but on the 18th. century there was no knowledge about cancer and the connection between tobacco and cancer.

But who knows, how much of those things kept secret in the 18th. century. Cancer would be a good way to ditch the people, who knew too much. The normal people did not know, what that thing, what caused blood in the sputum, and death very soon. So did the ancient doctors knew the connection between cancer and tobacco? Those things were secrets, that they could use to make people unable to tell anything when they are divorced from the active commanding position.

But another thing, what that pipe might mean is that if the person has put the active carbon filter in the pipe. And then the careless person would come to threat that thing, what is portrayed as death, that can be the last thing, what that person can ever do. If the room is filled with carbon monoxide, the filter can save the person's life, but the intruder would die.

And in some science fiction stories in the pipe would cover the small generator. That thing would give electricity to the small magnetron, which will give electromagnetic impulse to target, and that thing would cause even death. These kinds of things are always happening in science fiction tales. This kind of thing is making heroes or the master of bad guys invincible in the many tales, what are meant for the younger audience. These kinds of things are the most interesting examples of productive thinking, what makes us human beings.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

A short tale about benzene molecule

A short tale about benzene molecule

Dreams are things that are meant to protect people and also their mission is to handle the things, what is happened during the daylight. The scientific interest in the dreams began when the finder of the structure of benzene molecule, Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz (1829-1896) claimed to see that structure in the dreams, or he claimed to saw the snakes what rise from the flames, and then those snakes bit their narrow tail, and then von Stradonitz realize that the structure of the benzene molecule was ring.

This tale is mentioned in many books, and that influenced Sigmund Freud when he started to create his psychoanalysis. That tool was expected to allow access to people's memories of dreams, and the problem in the dreams is that the memory is connected off while a person sees dreams. And this thing is a shame because people are most creative while sleeping and during dreams, the entire brain capacity can be used for creative work.

This story about the invention of the form of the benzene molecule is one of the most remarkable innovators for dream research. Actually, after birth his name was Kekulé, but then he took the annex von Stradonitz in his name. This remarkable chemist died in the year 1896, and that means that he didn't have electron microscopes, and just modern observation tools like a laser- and electron microscopes have confirmed that structure.

The thing is that this story is really interesting because von Stradonitz couldn't see that structure, and how that man could understand or proven that aromatic hydrocarbons like benzene are extremely dangerous? Or how that man proved this thing. In modern laboratories laser microscopes, what can send the very short wave radiation by using extreme sharp frequency can see the structure of molecules and atoms.

Those objects need extremely sharp systems, which would scan surfaces with the very big resolution, and in those systems is used many types of radiation, and they are hybrid tools, what is created by connecting the laser- and electron microscopes. Modern high-tech systems can scan the surfaces with very high definition, and the difference between laser- and electron microscopes is that the first one uses neutral particles, photons what are not influencing the atoms and ions.

Electron microscopes problem in the laboratory work is that the system uses particles, what have the electric capacity. And that thing might influence the electron layers and combinations between atoms in the molecules. The thing in the benzene molecule is that this chemical combination causes cancer. And that thing was not proven in the time of von Stradonitz. During his lifetime cancer caused death penalty automatically.

When we are thinking the benzene molecule, and it's the ability to cause cancer, we must realize one thing. In our lifetime the benzene molecule is a very well known thing, and the reason why it causes cancer is also very well known. The reason is that benzene would damage the genomes of the cells, and that thing makes it extremely dangerous to handle. But why von Stradonitz saw the snakes in the flames? Did he saw some kind of weapon in that material?

When we are thinking about the name of that chemistry, we must notice that von is the part of the name, what shows that Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz was a military officer. So was he work for the German military? This kind of questions is really interesting.

Six clicks separate people from each other.

“A long-observed social phenomenon suggests that people across the globe are separated by surprisingly few connections. Credit: Stock” (Scit...