The mystery of alien megastructure has almost solved
The alien megastructure or one of the claimed alien megastructures has been solved, and the reason for the unusual change of brightness of the star has been uncovered the asteroids, what is orbiting the star in the unusual cluster. So there might not be civilization, what would be the scientific sensation of the millennium.
One of the things about that kind of things or structures in the universe is that we must get better observations and use the best possible equipment before we say something about those things. That kind of ideas that there could be alien civilizations are only one track in the lines of research. But we must keep our mind open when we are talking about the alien civilizations.
We cannot remove any kind of solutions before observations. And then we must realize, that we should dare to introduce different opinions about things, what has been introduced as the scientific facts. In philosophy and science, we must realize that people need very good poker face if they want to tell that they have different opinions with the so-called big thinker. But if we want to change things, we must dare to do that. We must say something, what is different than the common opinion.
Great scientists have always faced some kind of a cheat, and one of the best examples are the "jokes" where Charles Darwin was introduced as a monkey. Would you think that this kind of things is feeling nice? And after a long time, I sometimes think, that what the drawer of that image wanted to show? Was that person believed in being fun?
But maybe those things allowed that the evolution theory was denied. Maybe there was some kind of voting campaigns, that how many people believed that Darwin's theory of evolution was accepted or deny. And the side, who won that election would get a bottle of beer for that thing. This kind of things is increasing the assertiveness of science. The main purpose of scientists is always fall theories, what younger colleagues have been introduced, and repeating words, what famous people have said. The science is meaning that all evidence about things is collected before the judgment has been given.
In some writings is visible the attitude, that the use of own brains is always prohibited in places like University unless it supports people own opinions. And if somebody dares to introduce other opinions what have not included the texts, what are published before those people, that would cause laughs.
We are forgetting that we should trust some writings, and if writer shares information about what is faked for purpose or some other reasons not true, the responsibility for that information is the person who has written the original article. Not persons who use the trusted platform as the source for their articles.
If the original article is published in the respected magazine, the people have the right to believe that the article is properly checked. And if the images are made by using photoshop, that thing would seem a very good joke. But it might cause the extra work for astronomers, who are using those images in their texts as the source.
So when we are looking at the news about the cosmic megastructures, we must remember that we have only the knowledge, what is delivered in the news, and if we want to produce the new data about the object, we must buy the very large telescopes. So before we cannot get precise information about the object, we should make very big investments, or wait that somebody else is publishing the more precise data about that kind of things.
