What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

The castle above the clouds

The castle above the clouds

Did Gestapo take the name for Euthanasia program 14f13 (1) from the year of death of Jacques de Molay (1265-1314)(2)? There are many stories and legends about castles, and the people, who lived in them. Do you know that the grandmaster of Normandy Templars Jacques de Molay went to a bonfire in the year 1314, and the horrifying detail in history is that Nazi governments "Euthanasia" or killing operation Action14f13 has got the same numbers, what are the years of the death of Jacques de Molay? Is this thing coincidence or made in purpose remains a mystery. 

This page is an interesting image of the castle above the clouds, and I think that it would be interesting to think about people, who might live in that castle all their live. In this case, we would handle the thing, what is called as "grown in the bottle". That means that if the person is closed in that castle for all their life, they would think that the entire world is this castle. And in this perspective, the other people are like aliens to them. 

And that is the reason, why castles were built. Their mission was to isolate the noblemen from ordinary people. And this isolation meant that those people were able to serve their superiorities, bu that isolation also made easy to control the military officials by using fear. If the person, who was in charge of the castle would not do what the higher rank official want, that thing caused that the rebellious person would be arrested. 

But the thing that we are calling as isolation made also easy to control those people, who ruled the force. They needed money and food for a living, and this is the reason, why those castles are so effective tools for isolation and control. When we are thinking about the people, who lived in those castles, they might think that ordinary people were some kind of barbarians.

The thing is that those people knew, that they were acting wrong, but that thing turns to hate and fear. The thing is that the taxes, what the king was collected through those castles, and that hide the role of the king. And sometimes the people, who lived in the castles were prosecuted and convicted about stealing money from the king. But the reality was that this kind of case was meant for offering the sacrificed gift for people. 

And one of those cases is claimed to be the case of Elizabeth Báthory. The thing, in this case, was that this woman was not rougher than any other noble person in that kingdom. And also people claim that the prince of Hungary had debt from that family, which means that people sometimes compare that case with the case of Templars. 

They were arrested because they were officially revolt against the King of France. But the real reason could be that many noblemen in Europe were lent money from that organization. But who gave that money to Templars? Were those soldier-monks representatives of the Hansa, and that money belonged to that powerful organization of tradesmen. 

Templars could be suitable middlemen between Hansa and the customers of that bank, and that means that there could be people, who will not want to pay back those lendings. And maybe Templars didn't tell the origin of that money to the king, who thought that he must not pay that money back. So the prosecutions were the usury, and of course blasphemy. That thing caused, that three Templars sent to a bonfire in 1314. 

Sometimes have been claimed that Nazis took the name for their Euthanasia or killing program 14f13 from this case. But that thing can be pure coincidence. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_14f13

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_de_Molay

Image:

https://www.thelocal.de/20160803/germanys-10-most-iconic-castles-and-palaces

The campaign against changes, science, and education

The campaign against changes, science, and education

If we are thinking about the modern lifestyle, we are always forgetting than on the journey also traveling is important. In the modern world, things like interrail have a different meaning than in sometimes past, that thing allows a way to see more than some certain city. If we are thinking about flying and other things, they have offered us a way to be effective. Effectiveness what aviation brought was that director flew from city to another, and came to the office and said: "I'm busy".

Then that person flew to another city. This kind of thing brought very good status for a person, who would be often seen in the yard wearing a nice suit and slips. And sometimes somebody made "practical joke" to those people. They called to customs, that the person carried drugs, and that send that man to nice little room, where all clothes must be removed. If you make that "joke" it's a crime, remember that.

But when we are thinking about changes, like train and bus trips, they can also be effective working time. Modern mobile solutions like normal laptops, Chromebooks, mobile telephones and tablets offer a chance to work during this trip. And the network-based mobile applications offer change to make the same things as in-office while being on the train or cafeteria.

The remote work, what is made from the home is also a very effective way to operate if the time is used in work. And there is a lot of resistance against this type of work because that benefit, what is the same time ecologic is sometimes misused and things like hangover are sometimes covered by keeping "remote day". But if those days are spent on making work that would be an ecological and effective way to make work. And the sad thing is the misuse of those benefits.

Sometimes there have been claiming that resistance against remote work is causing because it is not pretentious. The person who makes remote work does not need expensive cars and even gets out of the home. Also, remote adjusting the data systems allow people to work everywhere they want. Excuses that remote-work would take free time or holidays from people is not a good explanation for resistance in this kind of case.

Rules that the workers are allowed to make their jobs by using the computers that are owned by the firm or company are solving that problem. When a person goes on holiday or free time the mobile system could shut down by the company, or those computers and telephones should leave for the office and that would separate the free time from working time.

Why people are looking at fake media, pseudoscience and other kinds of things. The answer is that they offer very good looking and very simple solutions for everyday life.  Who cares, how the universe has formed or big bang theories and DNA when people have many other things to think or do? And why somebody should read books when they can play ice hockey?

And why we should educate ourselves because we can ake billions of dollars per year by selling things like hoovers? This is a very interesting question for thinking in modern society, what is created for a fast, effective and hectic lifestyle, where everything is meant to be social and fast. If people are making something else, what needs something else, then fast movements and effectiveness, that would be the waste of time.

But as we know, knowledge is power. Education and knowledge are giving respect for leaders of the company. That thing is a really good way to keep other people away from the leading position in working life by telling, that some position needs education. And that would allow denying advertisements of uneducated people. But educated people are expensive, and that is one point of view in working life. As one pope once said, "people who have not knowledge are happy". That means that when people don't know their position they don't need or they don't want to change their conditions, and bread with the circus is enough for people as the Emperor of Rome said. That is one point of view things.

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Society has turned to two class people because the economical middle class is lost. That makes very big differences to things like economical and tax planning. Also, the middle class people had a role to work as the shock absorber between wealthy and poor people, and that causes problems with society.

The middle class has been separated in the higher and lower middle class, what has delivered the information from the poor people to the wealthy persons by natural social contacts, but when the abyss between incoming layers has been growing, that would cause problems to get information that the prizes or taxes are too high to ears of the persons, who make decisions. The problem in parliaments is that the people, who come from wealthy families are over-represented in those institutions.

Wealthy people have more money, and they would pay the membership fees for political parties more often than poor people, who need money for many other targets. This would cause the phenomenon, where politicians are receding from the poor people. If I would be a person, who lives in a one-room flat, I would feel uncomfortable to meet people, who live in own houses, because I would not have a normal social relationship with people, who have a different level of incoming.

The large middle class has also offered good field, where politicians could promise things, and that allowed the popularity, and if politician betrays the permissions, this thing can cause the there are no votes. And that's why politician must think carefully about permissions because the betraying those things can cause the dropping from parliament.

The problem is that there are less wealthy people than poor people, and the paradox is that wealthy people are funding the campaigns of politicians. But the votes come from poor people, and if a politician would just please wealthy people, that would cause the end of funding the campaign, but if the campaign pleases only the wealthy people, the means the loss of votes.

Loss of a normal social relationship, with normal discussions, would cause that those people would not have information, what is going on in the poor people neighborhood. And that causes fear mutually because every people have prejudice, and this is the thing, what trolls would benefit effectively. But when we are thinking about the loss of middle class people that causes economical problems, because of the role of middle class people has been acting as the financial reserve.

If the government needs more money, it would collect more taxes from the middle class people, and in the years, when there is not so big need for money the tax level can be decreased. But when we are talking about the thing like the federal reserve, there are many things, where those words are pointing. Of course, that means the central bank of the USA, but also that means the bumper, what gives limits how the economy can move, or it can mean the money what can use right away for some urgent building sites or other urgent targets.

One version of the reserve is marginal, where the level of taxes can move. When the level of taxes are planned the planner would calculate the minimum and maximum levels for taxes, and when the decisions of the level are made, the level of collecting the money would keep low, because that level can rise in the next year.

If we would think this way, the person, who determines the level of taxes operates in two year periods. In the first year, the level of taxes is determined, and on the second year, the determiner would check how those calculations connected to reality, and then adjust the levels of collecting taxes. This is one way to think about the role of middle-class people in the socio-economical field.

Who owns the money?

Who owns the money?

1. The differences between virtual and artificial currencies

There are two terms what are normally misunderstood in the real world. The virtual currency means the normal currency, what have digital form. And artificial currency is the currency, which is made by a private corporation.

The last one acts like normal currency, except those things, what are called as bitcoins are not public tender. They must be bought or sold in certain companies, and the thing differences them from natural currencies. The thing is that the trade with currencies or bitcoins is based the trust. If people trust the thing, they will use it.

1.2 Bitcoin operates in economics the same way with Java-program, what needs a virtual motor to run. This decreases the influence of normal economics. 

When we want to compare economics to the computer, we might think the normal or natural currency as the level of the operating system. If somebody drives things straight in this level, it might have a big influence on all economic situation. But if we would have something between the layers of the operating currency and the natural currency, we might suppress the influence of those actions.

The situation is similar to make programs in the world of computers. If those programs would drive straight on the operating systems, that would cause the jam or falling the entire system. This is why there is used the Java programming language in many universities and other institutes. Java uses the virtual machine between the operating systems layer and the programs, which denies the falling of the operating system if there are errors in the program.

1.3 Bitcoins operating in the world of finances like Java-program operates in the world of computers

If we want to compare the bitcoins to the normal virtual currency, the bitcoins are like the program, what is created by using Java-programming language. In the case of bitcoins, the action is similar to Java-programs. There is an operator or company between bitcoin and normal currency.

That thing corresponds to the Java virtual motor because if the operator would operate by using bitcoins, that would not have the same scale influence straight to the natural currency. There is a company between bitcoins and normal currency, and this decreases the influence of the buying and selling those things to normal currency.

2. The actor who owns the quantum prime number, what verifies the currency owns it. 

The answer to that question is very simple: the actor who owns the quantum prime number, what verifies the code, what is called as currency. There is a possibility, that if somebody would able to steal that prime number, that person can create own money on the Internet. The problem with the modern currency is that most of the international trade and currency remains on the Internet as the virtual form. That means that every single coin is actually the small file, that contains the information that is similar to the serial number.

But the number in virtual currencies is actually the quantum prime number, there are billions of numbers, and if we would want to print the bill, the length of that coupon would be more than a kilometer. The modern currency is actually the bitcoin, regardless the name of the currency, and if we are talking about artificial currencies like bitcoins, we must remember, that the traders, what operates with those things, are made a contract, that when somebody buys bitcoins, that operator would buy them back.

3. The key element in trading and financing is trust

That means that the bitcoin, what is actually the common name for artificial currencies is acting like money. But let's get back to currency, and the question, who owns it? The normal electronic currency is owned by the states, what has created it. And bitcoins are owned by companies. The problem with those currencies is that if somebody wants to buy them, is that the central computer makes money.

Because the government must buy the currency back, if somebody wants to sell them to it, that thing can break the entire economic field. Selling the currency happens simply by changing them to some other currency. And this thing makes virtual currency really problematic because there is no limit to create that thing.

The thing, what makes the artificial and virtual currency similar is that there is a method, how to verify the currency, and there is an actor, who buys it when somebody wants to sell currency. The artificial currency is not legal tender in public trade, but there is a possibility, that some supermarkets would start to operate with bitcoins. That means that there would be the bitcoin between the merchandise and the customer. The process would go that the customer would able to pay straight by using bitcoins, but those things are only the product of imagination.