The photon collisions are the new tool in physics.

The photon is the fastest known particle and the next tool for making models beyond the standard model is to start to collide the photons. That photon colliding is not so simple as we might think. Of course, by shooting two laser rays together is possible to make the collision between photons. And if the power of the laser rays is the same. At least in the impact point, the energy level is starting to rise. 

The thing that makes coherent light so dangerous is that the wave movement hits the same point in the material. That thing increases the energy level of the atoms of the impacting point. But when two laser rays are impacting together. They are starting to act like pieces of paper or carpet while they pushed against each other. They are starting to create the standing wave in the impact point. 

When two identical laser rays which wavelength and energy level are identical that causes an effect that impacting laser rays that are coming straight from opposite directions are stopping in the air. That thing can make the extremely high energetic area in the impact point. And if the electrons are shot through that point where is the standing wave. That loads a high energy level to the electron. Using the impacts of two symmetrical lasers can the energy level of the existing particle accelerators to rise.

The power of the particle accelerators can rise by shooting the particles through laser rays or extremely high-temperature holograms. And that thing moves the quantum annealing to high-energy physics. In science, we are living the time beyond the Standard model. And we don't know, should we just expand that model or make the new model or should scientists make the new model?

The difference between the high-accurate scientific work and a simplified model is to find out, what happens in the collision between individual photons. The individual photon collisions are the thing that can open new visions to the world of that well-known and at the same time so mysterious particle. 

We all know that photon is the particle of light. It's the first particle in which particle and wave movement forms are proven a long time ago. Or at least the particle and wave movement forms of the light have been proven a long time ago. But just the most modern scientific systems are captured images of single photons. 

Image and other sources:

()https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-probe-light-smashups-to-guide-future-research-beyond-the-standard-model/

What is the alternative explanation for the Brookhaven (Fermilab) observations?

The image above portraits the g−2 storage-ring magnet. That system Located at Fermilab. Originally researchers created that system for the Brookhaven g−2 experiment. The geometry allows for a very uniform magnetic field to establish in the ring. (Wikipedia/Muon g-2)

So what causes the interesting anomaly in the Brookhaven (Fermilab)low-energetic particle accelerator? The answer could be also a very weak gravitational effect. That turns the trajectory of the particle in the Muon g-2 experiment. If the fifth force is not existing could that thing that causes too strong curving in the Brookhaven laboratory be the gravitational wave of another universe? 

The thing is that the "fifth force" is much much weaker than the gravity. It's harder to see than other natural interactions. And there is the possibility that it's not even existed. But there is also the possibility that the scale of the "fifth force" is extremely large. 

Maybe it's visible only in the interactions of galaxies. Or maybe we could see the effect of this mystery from outside the entire universe. There is the possibility that the fifth force is not seen inside the universe because its form is a monotonic hum. In that case, we cannot see the changes of that force. 

Or if the effect of the fifth force can measure only between extremely large entireties that means we cannot see that thing. The other interactions are covering the fifth force. 

So another explanation why the mysterious "fifth force" is hiding is this: because the force is stable there is a problem with how to measure it. The "fifth force", if it exists is a similar wave-particle duality with other forces. 

But let's go to business and try to find out why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN has not seen the same things. Those are observed in the Brookhaven laboratory? The reason for that is simple. The LHC uses too much energy. And that means the weak interactions are not able to affect the trajectories of those particles. The Brookhaven laboratory uses much smaller energy loads than the LHC. And the weaker forces can affect the trajectories of the particles that are traveling in the accelerator of the Brookhaven laboratory. 

So if we are trying to compile why the Brookhaven accelerator is more suitable for observing weak natural interactions than the LHC we can use bullets as an example. The side wind would have more effect on the slow-flying bullet than the fast bullet. The reason for that is that the frontal pointing movement energy is higher in the fast-moving bullet. 

The wind effect of the slow-moving bullet is higher and the outcoming interaction like gravity wave is acting like the wind in the case of the bullet. At the first friction must slow the speed of the bullet so slow that the sidewind can push it out from the trajectory. 

The slow-moving low energetic particle is easier to push out from the trajectory than the fast-moving particle. The particle's speed in the LHC is near the speed of light. And the weak wave movement effect to so fast particles is harder to observe than the similar effect to the lower energetic and slower-moving particle. That's why Brookhaven laboratory sees anomalies that are not able to be seen by the LHC. 

()https://astronomy.com/news/2020/03/the-fifth-force-what-is-it

()https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-measure-the-magic-fine-structure-constant-20201202/#comments

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

How to find particles, which are more complicated to find than Higgs boson?

How to find particles, which are more complicated to find than Higgs boson?

Since the quarks have been discovered, scientists have been thought, what would form quarks? Then the physicians found the thing, what is called as "super spring". That means that there was something inside quarks, and that thing would be something, that we cannot even think about. But how we can release those particles from inside the quarks? The finding of the Higgs boson has put the scientists in the front of the thing, that every time, when we are looking for new particle, we must create the new particle accelerators for creating the energy level, what is high enough for releasing the new, small and short life particle from the other particles.

The main problem in those tests, what are made in CERN and other acceleration laboratories on our planet, is that if we would create the system, what will shoot new particles out from other particles, we must always operate in the highest limits of the system, and the main problem in those impacts is that the trajectory, what the particle travels in the accelerator tube must not curve very tight, because if the curve is too tight and the energy level is too high, the particle would impact the wall of the accelerator. The thing that makes it possible to make observations of those short-living particles is the extreme speed, and impact energy, which would make time slowing in those particles, which would connect with other particles very shortly after the impact. And that's why the observation of particles like Higgs boson is very difficult.

Higgs boson was only the gate, which proved that many things are waiting for the finder.

But one of the main problems is the size, what the particle accelerators would need if we would want to find new particles, what might be even more revolutionary than the Higgs boson, what proved that there are many particles, what we cannot even imagine. Even if we cannot see the particle itself, we can see the shadow of the particle, and that shadow is seen in the minimum errors between the behavior of real particles and theoretical particles. And one of those errors is minimum changes in the trajectories of particles when they are traveling in the sensor chamber after the electron has been impacting with positron or proton.

That tells that there are more particles, what is more, difficult to find or confirm than Higgs boson ever could be. And Higgs boson is like the gate to those theoretical particles, which can tell us more about the born of the Universe. If we want to find out even the smallest particles in the Universe, we must make larges and larger particle accelerators, for creating the energy levels, which is making it possible to form the new particles or separate them from the quarks.

The need to make larger and larger particle accelerators has brought one hypothetical thought in the mind of scientists and that is, what we can create the extremely large Van Allen belt, we could form two ion rays or flows, what we can collide with extremely high levels of energy, and there is one thing, what puts limit to that machine, and it is that it must be made to the space. If this enormous accelerator would build on the moon to its equator, that the ring-shaped magnets are put in the line, and the particles are traveling between those rings. There is a possibility, that it would make time moving slower in the moon, which would cause some kind of problems.

But if we would use a series of satellites, in theory, nothing puts limits on the size of the particle accelerator. The virtualization of particle accelerators would make it possible to create extremely large concepts in the field of nuclear physics. In this model the physical form of the particle accelerator by using a series of satellites, which can use magnets to accelerate the flow of ions. In some visions, there would be made virtualized particle accelerator, where series of satellites are accelerating ions between them  to the trajectory between Venus and Mercury, and those satellites can use solar power, and that would make possible to find new particles, what needs more energy than an accelerator, what created Higgs boson ever could create.

Those ions would consist of particles, what have opposite polarity, what keeps the ion ray in the form. And that allows creating the particle accelerator, what can be at the outside of the Oort cloud, and surround the entire solar system. The ion rays would travel in the chain of probably nuclear-powered satellites, which would drive ion rays between them. And in theory, we could make a linear accelerator between Sun and Alpha Centauri by using this technology, but the need for radioactive material and satellites is so large, that this thing would be theory forever. But theories are interesting, and maybe someday we would create massive linear accelerators to space, what length could be thousands of kilometers. They could revolutionize the science, and our way to see how the universe would work.

String theory and doubling the particles by using very high speed

String theory and doubling the particles by using very high speed

In this text, the speed means the speed, which is near the speed of light, and energy means energy, which is used in the CERN in the particle collision tests. So that means that those levels of speed and energy are really difficult to form in the scale, what this kind of tests require. And that's why this text is pure theoretical thoughts about string theory and how to benefit that thing in the distant future.

String theory is one of the most interesting theories in the world, and the idea is that the string theory would determine that every single particle at the universe is in the interaction with together, and they are connected by the strings. The string to the most massive particle is the most powerful, except the particle would not double, which means that the energy would duplicate the primary particle.

And the string theory explains that wormholes are superstrings between black holes, what are acting like giant electrons. There is interesting claiming about strings theory, which means that every particle in this universe would have double in another universe. So the interesting though is, could we someday transform ourselves in astral form?

The answers are more interesting than we can ever expect. In the world of quantum physics is the strange phenomenon, which is visible in the most powerful particle accelerators in the world. That thing is that when the electron would turn its trajector it would send the radiation, and that means the electron would be in two places at the same time. Those particles would be on both sides of the wire or string, and the speed of the particle would determine the distance, what those particles would take.

The thing that electron would be doubled means that the other particles can act as the electron and if we would double every particle in the universe by driving them in the very powerful cyclotron. There is one thing, what has been missed, and that thing is, how we can make neutrons to follow the magnetic track? That thing would make problems in the practical experiments, but there is a possibility, that we would double even ourselves by sitting in the magnetic carousel, which will accelerate people at a very high speed.

And the second problem is, how we can adjust the direction, where that double could form? So what happens, if we can do that thing? We could make an extremely effective machine, which will allow us to create the Jedi-type character, what can slip in the building in the astral form, walk in there and when the accelerator would stop, the double would be pulled back to the primary body. This would be an effective tool in the hands of intelligence.

But there are many risks in this kind of test. The main problem is that if we would sit in the magnetic centrifuge, we would face the G-powers or rather saying G-force, what is more powerful, than anything, what has been happened on Earth ever before, and the person would just crush because of those forces. The second thing is that the capsule, what will travel in the magnetic field would be the heaviest object, what has ever been in a particle accelerator. If there would be some kind of problems with magnets that are driving that capsule in the trajectory, the result would be a huge explosion.

The element Copernicium (Cn) (Element 112)

The element Copernicium (Cn) (Element 112)

Element 112 in the periodic table of elements or copernicium (chemical symbol: Cn)  is the 12th group of elements. That means this metal is so-called transition alcalde metal, and in the same group with mercury, zinc, and cadmium. That means that the copernicium might be liquid metal, and sometimes people have thought, that could the strange quicksilver, what is connected with UFO-power systems of high-energy lightweight nuclear reactors copernicium?

If we would someday benefit that kind of nuclear material in some still theoretical reactors, we must put that element in the particle accelerator, what would slow the time on the radioactive mass. The thing is that superheavy elements make possible to create extremely powerful, but small size reactors.

The problem is that storing those elements what can be existed is extremely difficult, and that means the benefiting of those particles would become in use of practical solutions in the future. But who knows what is going on those special laboratories, where this kind of research work is done. 

The evidence for that thing that the mysterious mercury could be copernicium is mentioned, that the longest life isotope of copernicium lifetime is 32 seconds, and the researchers should conclude the form of this element. But here we must say, that there have been only a couple of atoms of that element ever existed. The thing is that I don't know, what method the finder of that element used to produce copernicium. If that man used low-energy linear particle accelerator, that means that the production of a couple of atoms of copernicium would be easy, but this kind of things have a couple of problems if we would try to make this kind of things in practical life.

The first thing is that we must find two elements, what we want to use in a fusion reaction. Those elements should have ion form, what have different polarity because the opposite polarity would help to aim the ion ray. And then the ions would shoot through the particle accelerator to the chamber, where those atoms would connect if the fusion would have enough energy.

Or actually, the energy level must be precisely right, or the particles would destroy each other in the impact if the accelerators would operate in too high energy level. And fusion method has a couple of other problems. When the particles impact together, there is a possibility that part of them would turn to energy, and that's why we cannot produce any elements just by shooting two ionized lighter elements together.

At first, the energy level of the particle accelerator must adjust precisely right. Then the ion rays must target that way, the fusion would be possible. Aiming of the system is difficult, and then the spectroscope must aim at the right point. The camera what will take images of the spectrum line must operate with very high speed, that it can see the line, what the element, what has extremely short lifetime sends.

And those elements, what is researched in this way are very high radioactive. In fact, in theory, we could produce hundreds or thousands of new artificial elements, but the thing is that those elements must have some mean. Chemically the structure of the electron cores is always following the system what is involving in the periodic table of elements, but the spectroscope is the only way, how researchers can confirm the existence of the new element. The short existence along with the low number of those atoms makes chemical tests with those atoms impossible.

Rutherford's mussel and creation of antimaterial

Rutherford's mussel and creation of antimaterial

Rutherford's mussel means the spiral track where would shoot ions by using the magnetic accelerator. Or in this case, the name of the device would be particle accelerator, and the mussel or spiral structure would be equipped with extremely powerful magnets, what would keep the ions away from the walls. When those ions would travel in this track the idea is that it would transform the spin of the particle to the opposite, and that would allow creating antimaterial.

If this device would work, it would revolutionize many things in physics and technology, both in civil and military sectors. When we are thinking about the ability to create a very large number of positrons or anti-electrons, we could use those little particles for many purposes. They could be suitable fuel for the very powerful nuclear rockets, which opens the road to the entire solar system, and maybe to the nearest stars.

But the anti-electrons can be used as the most horrifying weapon in the world. If those particles are shoot to the atmosphere that would cause a very powerful explosion. And that makes possible to create almost microscopic bombs, which can have a powerful explosive capacity.  If the genomes of the virus would be removed, and the surface of that bite will be covered with extremely small magnets, what will pull the positrons away from the walls, of the chamber, that system would allow making small-size, but at the same time extremely powerful weapon.

The thing is that the anti-electron must not contact with electrons, or they would transform into energy. And the core of the virus would keep the regular material away from the antimaterial nucleus because if those particles are touching together that will cause a huge explosion. So the miniaturization would make Teller's bomb or antimaterial bomb extreme deadly. But if the antimaterial-ions would shoot against the incoming asteroid or planet, the antimaterial can destroy that incoming object. The gram of antimatter would destroy the earth-size planet, and maybe that technology where ion-cannon will shoot the incoming object can save the world.

The flash when anti-electron impacts electron is extremely powerful and that thing could be used as the very high power lasers. That kind of laser-systems would be the conventional lasers, where the light would create by using electron-positron collisions for creating the light for the laser beam. That would increase the power of lasers in the brand new level. Those solutions might interest military and civil persons, who are creating new lasers for many purposes.

Sometimes people asking about names of the systems and planned to use in physics, and we must remember that the names of those systems are not coming from their real inventors. So this means that the creator of this theoretical device can be everybody in the field of theoretical physics. But the devices can be named after dead men because those men cannot tell secrets to other people, and many nuclear secrets are not meant for ears of a great audience.

Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

When we are talking about fission reaction, we must remember that depends on the point of view, who created the first nuclear reaction. If we talk about self-sustaining nuclear fission the man who created that reactor in the Cigaco University was Enrico Fermi and the man who first split atom was Erns Rutherford. And Fermi benefits the work, what Rutherford made when he manufactured the first nuclear reactor. The thing what has sometimes introduced is to split some non-radioactive element like lead by bombing those atoms by using very high-speed electrons or ions.

This kind of technologies has seemed useless, and only material what could replace uranium in nuclear reactions could be thorium, and the idea is that the thorium atoms would bomb the high-speed ions during that reaction, and that technology is under study in many countries. Rutherford created an idea of a fusion reaction. When we are thinking about that era technology, the self-sustaining reaction was impossible, and the success means in this case that a couple of atoms could be connected.

In ITER homepage is mentioned that Rutherford along with his assistant Oliphant connected tritium Atom to Helium, but two atoms are not made fusion power. But there is a possibility that the fusion can be created by using particle accelerator. In that theory, the particle accelerator would shoot the ions in the chamber with very high power, and then that would make those particles melting together.

If the ions have different polarity, they should go together because of the magnetic pulling effect, what should make the use of fusion fuel more effective. But there are any problems with this kind of fusion reactors. The idea is to shoot ions by using "Y"-shaped structure of particle accelerators, where two tracks of accelerators what will accelerate the particles what have different polarity to the single point of the structure.

There have been introduced the theory that compiling two elements lead (element 58) and bismuth (element 33) by using fusion could create moscovium (element 115), what is claimed to produce in some places like AREA-51. There is another reaction in the Wikipedia page, which tells about this element. In this hypothetical reaction, the ions of the lead and bismuth will shoot together by using linear accelerators, and the moscovium would give extremely high power in the lightweight nuclear reactors.

We know that the moscovium is existed, but is there some effective and economical ways to produce so much about that element that it can be used in some kind of nuclear reactors. The half-time of moscovium is extremely fast, and that means that the element must be stored in the place, where are absolute zero points or zero Kelvin temperature what might slow the half of that material.

Or another version is to store that material in the particle accelerator, where it would accelerate to the speed, what will be near the speed of light, and that thing would slow the time in that material. But there is no evidence that this kind of systems has been tested in some places, except Bob Lazar statements, that he was working with the element 115 in AREA-51. But that man has not believed until the existence of element 115 has been confirmed.