Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?
Are dark energy and dark material the same thing?
The dark energy is one of the mysterious things in the Universe. And sometimes the creation of dark energy is explained that the spin of quarks is causing the thing, what is known as dark energy. The free quarks would be the dark material in this very interesting theory, which could explain part of the dark energy and dark material.
Sometimes we are thinking that the dark energy and dark material are the same things, and this means that we should call those things "Dark stuff" or ether. But we don't know are those things the same thing, and that's why we must say that those things are dark matter and dark energy, and they are one of the most interesting and fascinating things, what are seen in the Universe.
Is dark material free quark, what spin forms dark energy?
There are two theories about the form of dark material and dark energy, another is that thing is forming by the particles, what is something like free quarks or some other thing, and second theory is that thing is free to wave kind of movement in the thing, what we are calling Universe. And that means that the dark energy is like some kind of radio waves, but that thing is too quiet to notice by using radiotelescopes.
So could the dark energy be only the very low energic radiowaves? And then if we are thinking that the dark energy is so-called free wave movement in the Universe, the next question is, what is causing that wave movement, or what moves in that wave movement. And the thing, why the form of the dark energy and dark material is interesting is that is it possible that there is a small particle in the Universe, what is in the border between energy and material?
Could there be some kind of particle that works as a "gate" between energy and material?
And if we could find that thing, we must realize, that this hypothetical particle could be the thing, which helps us to turn the energy to the material. That kind of thing is a fascinating thing, and we know that there is theoretically possible to turn the energy into the material because we can turn the material to energy. But how we can do that thing? That is the thing, what is the problem with the mirror-effect, what could revolutionize everything. The thing is that we haven't made any single of these kinds of successful tests.
If the dark energy would be some kind of very low energic radio waves, that thing means that the dark energy would not affect the small particles at all. That means that even the largest stars would not affect by the dark energy, because of their energy production would cover that effect. But the extremely large entireties like the intergalactic molecule clouds the dark energy would affect. Those molecule clouds are extremely thin, and those forms are extremely stable.
Showing posts with label dark material. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dark material. Show all posts
Thursday, November 14, 2019
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Are nano-sized black holes one form of the dark material?
Are nano-sized black holes one form of the dark material?
So what is the dark material? This is the question of the day. Normally we are forgetting one simple thing, what can form material, what we cannot observe. That thing is the singularity, the nano-sized black holes, which are smaller than the electrons or quarks, and that thing can explain the dark material. But as you see this is the philosophical writing without any scientific proof.
Today I have a day when I think very much dark material, and this day could be named as the "day of dark material". And at least I will write about the form of dark material, and what it can be. So is the answer to that question, what is the form of this very interesting material simple the singularity, what is forming inside the nucleus of atoms, or in theory nono-size, black holes can form also inside protons and neutrons, and even inside electrons.
In this case, electromagnetic radiation that hits single atoms can cause that their electric capacity would rise. And when the capacity is high enough that energy is forming the tiny black hole inside the particles of an atom. And this thing would explain the dark material or at least part of this strange material, what existence we know, but we cannot observe it.
Are the steaming or exploding nano-size black holes causing the forming of dark energy? Are the most of the material of universe tie in the black holes, what are smaller than electrons? And would that thing explain everything about dark material? Here I just want to say, that this writing is only hypothetical thought about theoretical materials and research.
But what that means in real life, if part of dark material is in the tiny black holes? That means that the universe would be full of very small black holes, which are traveling in the universe, but this thing feels impossible. The small size singularity would be steamed in very little time. So could those steaming small black holes causing the effect, what we are known as dark energy.
This thing opens the one small thing in my mind, and that is could we someday form this kind of material. In theory, everything seems very easy. The system must just create tiny black holes inside the nucleus of the atoms or particles of atoms. And could that thing do simply by targeting high-energy radio waves to the thing, what we want to turn to dark material?
If we are thinking the spacecraft what have the form of the saucer, in the middle of that craft could be set the high-power radio transmitter. When that system would start to act, it can create the black holes in the nucleus of atoms.
The mystery of dark energy and dark material
The mystery of dark energy and dark material
The energy must become cold and dark before it can condense to the material. This is the idea of the thing that material can turn to energy, and energy can turn to the material. The first one is an everyday phenomenon, but the last one needs special circumstances for happening. And this is why dark energy and dark material are interesting things. Maybe they are parts of the same effect or phenomenon, which might connect those things to gravity. And that is the reason, why I handle those things in the same text.
When Albert Abraham Michelson metered the speed of light, that man proved that the "ether" or mythic form of the material, what is forming space does not exist. The speed of light was the same every time, and that means that the existing of "ether" was not true. And the speed of light was a little bit lower than 300 000 000 meters per second.
The speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, which was lower than calculated speed, and that thing was not caused reactions, and physicists corrected their calculations by using the speed, what Michelson was reported. And that's it, the speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, and nobody even thought that could there maybe some kind of reason, why the real speed of light is lower than it should be.
If calculations are made right, there is something, that will slow the photons, and that thing has been caused the discussions, that there is something wrong in the universe. Then the astronomers found the case, that the universe is too heavy, and there is something, that we cannot see or feel, but the thing is that something has a very large effect on the universe itself.
That thing is called as the dark material or dark energy. The thing that makes that effect very interesting is that we could call those things as "ether". But when we are starting to think about this strange mystery, what we are calling as the dark energy and dark material, we are facing one very interesting paradox. Mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, in the opposite effect, what is one of the most fascinating things in the world of science.
We transform mass to energy in every day, but what if we could make the reaction backward? That means we could send things through the electric wires. And then we must ask one question, what might revolutionize entire science. Could the dark energy and dark material be the stages, when the energy would turn to the material?
So the thing is that some intelligent people think that energy would turn cold before it would start to take the material form, and is the dark energy forming the dark material? In this case, the dark material would be the gate between energy and material. When we are thinking about the form of the dark material, we can think that It is a so-called proto-material, what is forming the "real material".
In some Big Bang theories, the cold big bang continues even today, and the energy is turning to the material. And that thing could be the answer to dark energy. Energy must turn to dark and cold before it can condense to the material.
That thig could be called as the "slow big bang". But that thing is only one version of the theory of the dark and dark material, what is connected to that thing. Another version of the dark energy and dark material is that they could be so-called "free gravitons", which makes people think, that there might be some kind of connection between dark energy, dark material, and gravity. Could gravity turn energy into the material? That is a really interesting question.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
The energy must become cold and dark before it can condense to the material. This is the idea of the thing that material can turn to energy, and energy can turn to the material. The first one is an everyday phenomenon, but the last one needs special circumstances for happening. And this is why dark energy and dark material are interesting things. Maybe they are parts of the same effect or phenomenon, which might connect those things to gravity. And that is the reason, why I handle those things in the same text.
When Albert Abraham Michelson metered the speed of light, that man proved that the "ether" or mythic form of the material, what is forming space does not exist. The speed of light was the same every time, and that means that the existing of "ether" was not true. And the speed of light was a little bit lower than 300 000 000 meters per second.
The speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, which was lower than calculated speed, and that thing was not caused reactions, and physicists corrected their calculations by using the speed, what Michelson was reported. And that's it, the speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, and nobody even thought that could there maybe some kind of reason, why the real speed of light is lower than it should be.
If calculations are made right, there is something, that will slow the photons, and that thing has been caused the discussions, that there is something wrong in the universe. Then the astronomers found the case, that the universe is too heavy, and there is something, that we cannot see or feel, but the thing is that something has a very large effect on the universe itself.
That thing is called as the dark material or dark energy. The thing that makes that effect very interesting is that we could call those things as "ether". But when we are starting to think about this strange mystery, what we are calling as the dark energy and dark material, we are facing one very interesting paradox. Mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, in the opposite effect, what is one of the most fascinating things in the world of science.
We transform mass to energy in every day, but what if we could make the reaction backward? That means we could send things through the electric wires. And then we must ask one question, what might revolutionize entire science. Could the dark energy and dark material be the stages, when the energy would turn to the material?
So the thing is that some intelligent people think that energy would turn cold before it would start to take the material form, and is the dark energy forming the dark material? In this case, the dark material would be the gate between energy and material. When we are thinking about the form of the dark material, we can think that It is a so-called proto-material, what is forming the "real material".
In some Big Bang theories, the cold big bang continues even today, and the energy is turning to the material. And that thing could be the answer to dark energy. Energy must turn to dark and cold before it can condense to the material.
That thig could be called as the "slow big bang". But that thing is only one version of the theory of the dark and dark material, what is connected to that thing. Another version of the dark energy and dark material is that they could be so-called "free gravitons", which makes people think, that there might be some kind of connection between dark energy, dark material, and gravity. Could gravity turn energy into the material? That is a really interesting question.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?
What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?
This thing would determine is gravity pushing or pulling force? If gravity would pull an object, that thing means that the object is normally surrounded by the harmonic gravity field, and that's why the object doesn't move in space.
That kind of case cannot happen in real life, because space is not empty, and the idea is that every particle at the universe has interaction between each other. The idea of dark energy is that thing has a similar form with other types of energy, and because the mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, that means that the dark energy can turn to dark matter.
But what is dark energy? Sometimes that is called a graviton or mysterious dark photon, which means that the dark photon would push the objects away, and the gravity itself would pull them together. And here I will say, that the dark energy and gravitons have the connection, but we cannot prove it, because we cannot make calculations or make observations about that thing.
But if we are thinking that dark photon is the graviton, we must re-establish the form of dark energy. The thing is that when we are thinking about the form of gravity, some philosophers have created an idea, that gravity is the pulling force. That means that the source of gravestones would be the opposite side of objects, and they will push the particles together. So the idea is that the gravitons are coming from the back of the object if we are observing the thing from the surface of other particles.
And that means that there would be open the string or weak version of Einstein-Rosen bridge between two objects, and then gravitons would push those objects, and then the bridge between those particles is pulling them together. That means that there are no gravitons in that bridge, that means there is no dark energy, and then the gravitons would push the objects together. There is no evidence about this kind of direction between those mysterious particle's effects on the universe.
When we are observing a thing, that is called the interaction between particles, which means that every single particle in the universe has the bridge or string with every other particle. The particle would travel to the most dominant particle, which means that the bridge between those particles is strongest. So the shorter version of this verbal explanation is that in a normal situation the gravitons are bombing particles from every direction.
That means that those particles are not moving, and if there would be open the bridge, where is no or where are fewer gravitons the object would start to float in that channel and this case the most dominant channel would win. And that thing is given the idea of the theoretical antigravity. The idea is that gravitons would be removed from the other side and then the gravitons would push or pull the object above the mass center.
But for creating that kind of machine, we must realize, how we can first, prove the existing of gravitons, and the second thing that causes problems is finding out the direction where the graviton effect. Does the graviton push or does it pull the object? And for finding out that thing, we must first see the gravitons.
Sunday, September 1, 2019
What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends
What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends
In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.
When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.
That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.
In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?
The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.
What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.
But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.
When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.
The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.
In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.
The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.
But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.
So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.
In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.
When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.
That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.
In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?
The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.
What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.
But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.
When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.
The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.
In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.
The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.
But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.
So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.
Monday, June 3, 2019
The parallel universe theory and the collateral reality
The parallel universe theory and the collateral reality
1.Parallel universe theory
There are many times talked about the parallel universes, which means that universes are like pearls in the necklace. In that theory, there could be other universes in another dimension, but that theory consists of the idea, that there could be also another universe in our own dimension, what makes this theory very interesting.
Parallel universe theory handles the universe as the supergroup of supergroups of galaxies, and there is the empty space between those universes, what are like bubbles, or the concentration of the material. Because the space between those bubbles is empty, which means that there are very little energy and particles, which means it is empty if we want to compare it to the bubbles. And this means that there could be "anti-universes".
2. Antimatter and magnetic pushing force would explain the dark energy
Maybe anti-universes and antimatter explain also the thing, what is known as "dark energy". The dark energy means that the positions, what is the name of the anti-electron are pulling protons away from them, and that would mean, that the pushing force of particles, what have similar polarity is the thing, what is called "dark energy".
Also, antiprotons are pushing the electrons away, and here we can talk antiprotons as well as positrons. The energy level of the antiproton, or proton, what is the proton, what has a negative polarity is much higher than positrons, and that thing would push the electron layers of the atoms.
Most of the material in the universe is in the form of energy. Most of the particles are actually electrons and photons. That means that the universe is actually full of electrons, what is not connected to the atoms. If the position would impact the electron, that causes that the atom loses the electron layer, and the nucleus would be damaged. But the antiproton can just turn the atom to ions. And the dark energy would rip the entire universe in pieces in the distant future.
3. Universes are the series of megastructures
Those bubbles, what we are calling as the "universes" can also form by antimatter. That antimatter is the mirror version of the material, and if the antimatter would touch matter, that causes the annihilation, reaction where entire material would turn to energy. The idea of that theory is given the observation, that sometimes the antimaterial particle would impact the atmosphere, which means that there is antimatter somewhere.
When we are thinking about anti-universes and universes, we might realize that those things are very interesting, regardless are those antimatter-universes in our dimension or in some other dimension. And here we are facing the biggest "if" in the theories of the universes and matter. There is a possibility, that every each particle of our universes has an opposite or mirror-particle partner in some other universe.
4. Universes can be in our dimension, but they can also be in some other dimension
That means that we would have twin duplicate in that other universe. But we ever can meat or touch that duplicate, because that thing is antimatter version of us. This thing is pure theoretical thinking, and even if each particle in our universe has the duplicate, that doesn't mean that the particles have taken the same structural form, what they have taken in our universe.
So what the universes are in this theory. They are series of the enormous megastructures, which might be totally unique. That means that those bubbles might not have stars or planets at all, and they are forming only the atoms and molecules, what have the form of the nebulae. Or they can be full of black holes, but if they are in our dimension, the laws of nature are the same in each of them.
1.Parallel universe theory
There are many times talked about the parallel universes, which means that universes are like pearls in the necklace. In that theory, there could be other universes in another dimension, but that theory consists of the idea, that there could be also another universe in our own dimension, what makes this theory very interesting.
Parallel universe theory handles the universe as the supergroup of supergroups of galaxies, and there is the empty space between those universes, what are like bubbles, or the concentration of the material. Because the space between those bubbles is empty, which means that there are very little energy and particles, which means it is empty if we want to compare it to the bubbles. And this means that there could be "anti-universes".
2. Antimatter and magnetic pushing force would explain the dark energy
Maybe anti-universes and antimatter explain also the thing, what is known as "dark energy". The dark energy means that the positions, what is the name of the anti-electron are pulling protons away from them, and that would mean, that the pushing force of particles, what have similar polarity is the thing, what is called "dark energy".
Also, antiprotons are pushing the electrons away, and here we can talk antiprotons as well as positrons. The energy level of the antiproton, or proton, what is the proton, what has a negative polarity is much higher than positrons, and that thing would push the electron layers of the atoms.
Most of the material in the universe is in the form of energy. Most of the particles are actually electrons and photons. That means that the universe is actually full of electrons, what is not connected to the atoms. If the position would impact the electron, that causes that the atom loses the electron layer, and the nucleus would be damaged. But the antiproton can just turn the atom to ions. And the dark energy would rip the entire universe in pieces in the distant future.
3. Universes are the series of megastructures
Those bubbles, what we are calling as the "universes" can also form by antimatter. That antimatter is the mirror version of the material, and if the antimatter would touch matter, that causes the annihilation, reaction where entire material would turn to energy. The idea of that theory is given the observation, that sometimes the antimaterial particle would impact the atmosphere, which means that there is antimatter somewhere.
When we are thinking about anti-universes and universes, we might realize that those things are very interesting, regardless are those antimatter-universes in our dimension or in some other dimension. And here we are facing the biggest "if" in the theories of the universes and matter. There is a possibility, that every each particle of our universes has an opposite or mirror-particle partner in some other universe.
4. Universes can be in our dimension, but they can also be in some other dimension
That means that we would have twin duplicate in that other universe. But we ever can meat or touch that duplicate, because that thing is antimatter version of us. This thing is pure theoretical thinking, and even if each particle in our universe has the duplicate, that doesn't mean that the particles have taken the same structural form, what they have taken in our universe.
So what the universes are in this theory. They are series of the enormous megastructures, which might be totally unique. That means that those bubbles might not have stars or planets at all, and they are forming only the atoms and molecules, what have the form of the nebulae. Or they can be full of black holes, but if they are in our dimension, the laws of nature are the same in each of them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Six clicks separate people from each other.
“A long-observed social phenomenon suggests that people across the globe are separated by surprisingly few connections. Credit: Stock” (Scit...
-
“A long-standing mystery surrounding an unusual superconductor has taken a decisive turn. By carefully applying shear strain to ultrathin cr... -
Subconscious and quantum computing 1) Should computers have subconscious or ability to see dreams? When we are thinking about the p... -
The "white life" of some secret societies When people who are members of the secret societies are claiming, that there is nothi...