The thoughts about mushroom and Charles Darwin

The thoughts about mushroom and Charles Darwin

Sometimes people have thought about the similarity between toadstool and strawberry. Those mushrooms are poisonous, and if we think that toadstools are mushrooms, what would use dead cells as a nutrient, we must realize that the mushroom has benefited about these similarities. If some animal would eat the mushroom, what looks like a nice strawberry, that would cause deadly poisoning. This strange similarity has caused an idea in the mind of philosophers, who always are looking for answers for the most interesting and difficult questions.

The thing what this strange similarity has caused can the evolution be somehow controlled, what consists the thought, that could the species somehow control the internal evolution in the direction, where it wants? Of course, this kind of things are possible to make in the laboratory, but when we are thinking about the spontaneous forming of the species, we must ask one question more, and that is how those toadstools got their form? Or otherwise, how the strawberries got their form?

That kind of things can be explained by natural selection, that some mushrooms would take their form because the strawberries made animals think, that every red ball in nature was good to taste and full of vitamins, and then that idea started the nature to favor the mushrooms, what are looking like strawberries. Those mushrooms would get fresh nutrient if they would cheat the animal to eat those poisonous things.

But as we might realize the mysteries are not ending in the world. And the biggest mysteries can be found in our backyard. When we are thinking about Darwin and his Theory of Evolution, we must realize that he could collect all data, what that person needs from the British Islands. So the trip to Galápagos islands was unnecessary. If we want to make a model, how enriching the genetic material, we have not to go to some Galápagos islands.

We must only go to the British forests, and see how natural selection has influenced some butterflies, what are looking like the same butterflies, which can be found in continental Europe. But those butterflies have different colors. The same way the form of the toadstools has formed in history. But let's go back to Darwin, and his life, we must say that his Evolution theory has not questioned.

That thing is the fact and the thing what I wonder is, what was the role of Darwin in the famous "Beagle" ship? Was he some kind of scientist, member of the crew, or how he allowed to travel and collect samples? How did he explain those things to the crew and captain? There must be much space in that ship because Darwin could take his samples with him.

The silent media

The silent media

There have been rumors that the people, who have been family members of the social media activists have been offered cheap trips to Russia and China, and that thing has been used to force the activists to keep their mouth shut. The social media is the thing, what has been uncovered the problems in western society, as well as the problems in the authoritarian nations.

The authoritarian leaders are always offering support to each other, and this thing is one of the saddest notifications from history. When the people who were resisting the dictatorship got the power, the new rulers have used the same methods, what their predecessors have been used. The reality is that the name of the leader and the faces in the photographs on the wall have been changed, but the way to use power has stayed similar, what the ruler, what have been lost in history had.

The name of the secret police changes, but methods are the same. And the worst thing, what the nation can face is the popular dictator. Even if the first dictator is a civilized person, sooner or later would the power would go to the hands of despots, as we have seen many times in history. Sooner or later the ruler would change to the tyrant, who has started the persecutions against people, who are talking against them.

The defects in society might be kept silent by the press because it is controlled by some authoritarian leaders. The censorship of the media is a very good tool to claim people that resistance is useless, and the "reasonable" people are flexing in the prevalent situation. If a person is not reasonable, the results would be very bad. This is the agenda, how the authoritarian leaders are operating in the media. They are claiming, that they are so popular, that people should not even try to resist them.

And the weapon of those people is the "qualified journalism", as they are telling to people. If we are thinking about the agenda of qualified journalism in the point of view of religion, what is a good way to order people to keep their mouth shut, we must notice one really interesting thing in those writings, what bases on the Holy Bible. Those qualified journalists are taking only a couple of words of this book or only the parts, what are supporting their opinions, and leave the rest of it without notice.

One thing what is the most popular way to read that book is it offers authority to elder people. And in that book is mentioned that people have the right to punish their children, but the golden rule is always forgotten. That means that if a person really wants to get bitten because of the opinions or things, what are against other people opinions, means that the person must be real sadomasochist. But that kind of things is always forgotten from the so-called qualified journalist's way to write about the things.

When we are thinking about the newspapers, they have been the greatest supporters of democracy. But they have also been the greatest weapons in the hands of the bloodiest dictators in history. When we are thinking about violence and other kinds of things in history, there have always claimed that torture and another kind of things, what is made by the authoritarian police have been only the single cases, but would you feel nice, if you were one of those single cases?

The persons who own the newspaper or media-house are ruling the line of that thing. And if the trusted media house is turning to the hands of the authoritarian leaders, would the results be devastating. The problem is that buying the media houses can be done by using middlemen, and that means that the real owners would be really difficult to track. If the owner is operating behind the threads of many companies, what is registered in the multiple countries the real ruler can hide behind those threads.