The brain stimulation and the helping tools for handicapped

The brain stimulation and the helping tools for handicapped

PoNS (The Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator)

Does the reptilian hybrid mean the human, what seems to have the tongue, what is similar to snakes and lizards? This kind of thing would also mean that the person has the electric stimulation equipment connected to the tongue. This method is also known as PoNS (The Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator) (1)

If we would want to make effective manipulation to human brains by using the electric stimulation, the system would be acting also if a person is in sleep, and this thing would be used along with the anesthetic. The thing is that this kind of thing can be used as the learning tool in the case of ADHD, or to controlling things like exoskeletons. 

Originally the electric shock system, which gives the stimulation by tongue was created for helping blind people surviving in everyday life. The idea was to send the signals from the camera to the tongue, and by those nervous tracks to brains. But it can be connected to the HULC-style exoskeletons and the entire body of the people can be covered by electrodes, which would stimulate the muscles if he nervous tracks of the body are damaged. 

This kind of system can also be used to stimulate muscles in the case of ALS. The thing is that by using the hat with electrodes, what is controlling the exoskeleton or electrodes, what are stimulating muscles would be more comfortable, but using the system, what can be kept in the mouth would the safety will be guaranteed in the case, when the hat is dropped or bandanna must take off. 

The thing is that brains cannot separate the signal, what is traveling in the nervous system, and that makes it possible to use the same systems aa the ultimate teaching method, but there is a danger that those systems will be used as the ultimate propaganda tool. When the signal travels in the nervous system it would stimulate the sight center of human brains, and then the brains will handle that signal similar way with normal sight. 

And that makes possible to use that technology for many other things. Sometimes there is planned to use that kind of system with infrared cameras. The difference between the camera, what is connected to tongue and bandanna is that the system, what is connected to the tongue would be easy to remove. It can work as a backup tool in the case when a person needs those tools. 

If the cameras are connected to bandanna, what stimulates the brain core, the person would feel the camera like own eye. And the thing is that if persons will put the brain stimulator to mouth, the problem is in hygiene and communication. But if the system is put to tongue the needed electricity is smaller. 

When we are thinking the possibility to load data straight to the brains of the person connecting the EEG stimulator to the tongue will be more comfortable. The thing is that the person who is under the stimulation can keep in the sleep by using anesthetic gas, and the stimulation system can be covered as the breathing machine. The thing is that this kind of system can be used to make faked memories. 

This makes them dangerous in the wrong hands. Always when we are manipulating the human nervous system, we must realize that we can make a person believe things, which are not true. This makes those systems problematic. We can use them as the ultimate teaching tool, but we can use it also a very effective propaganda tool.

(1)

https://heliusmedical.com/index.php/divisions/heliusmedical/the-pons-device

https://ct1.medstarhealth.org/content/uploads/sites/22/2015/01/NRH_NewDim_Spring2017_fnl.pdf

https://www.medicaldevice-network.com/news/fda-rejects-helius-medical-pons-device/

https://heliusmedical.com/

Could be possible to make interstellar or interplanetary spacecraft what would operate without an internal power source?

Could be possible to make interstellar or interplanetary spacecraft what would operate without an internal power source?

One of the greatest problems with space technology and extremely long operating spacecraft is the need for nuclear power. Nuclear energy would increase the political resistance against aviation and space technology. But first so-called green aircraft have been introduced for a great audience.

There have been introduced visions, that maybe someday we could create spacecraft, what doesn't need nuclear reactors and antimaterial rockets for long-distance space travel, but those systems would be far in the future. The idea is to create a spacecraft, where are the channels on the outer layer. The system would seem like a humpback whale or ball, where are channels, depending on the form of the system. And those channels would be equipped with a magnetic acceleration track, which would pull the ion gas through that those channels, which would act as the WARP-accelerators.

The energy for that system can deliver by using a high power radio transmission, or in some wildest dreams, the spacecraft can benefit the radiation of pulsars for the operation. If that kind of spacecraft would sometimes create that thing allows very interesting points of view to the space traveling. The idea of the system would be to use a group of very powerful radio telescopes, which would send the electricity to that spacecraft.

In more conventional solutions the ion motors can use solar panels for operating inside the asteroid belt. And those solar panels can also be used for cooling elements for the nuclear reactors. So inside the asteroid belt, the solar panels would decrease the need to use the nuclear power for electric systems, and that saves the nuclear fuel in the reactor.

The thing is that we can create electric powered helicopters and aircraft, which can use solar panels or pressure-based systems for creating electricity. That kind of system can load the batteries of the aerial vehicle and the electricity, what that system creates depends on the length of the tube.  Of course, the generators need delicate moving bearings, that it can rotate. There have been ideas that the pressurized air could use as the rotator of the generator even in satellites. In this system, the air would rotate the turbine, when it travels from the tank to another one.

If the gas travels from another tank to another, that eliminates the recoil, which would turn satellite away from the position. The idea of this very extraordinary system is that the satellite would normally operate by using the solar panels, but if it sometimes needs extra energy very fast, that pressure system can give it to the satellite, and that technology has been introduced for killer satellites, low and sub- or sub-orbital satellites, because it denies the secret battery technology deliver to the hands of opposite force, if the satellite would drop to opposite territory. So when the system operates in a normal situation, the solar-powered compressors would pump the air to another tank, and when the extra energy is needed, the pressurized air would send to the vacuum.

Fullerene based hydride materials are giving new ideas for researchers of technology.

Fullerene based hydride materials are giving new ideas for researchers of technology.

Silicon-carbon hybrid fullerenes can revolutionize materials and electric production. Those materials can be used as the fusion devices as well as creating the extreme hard layers.

Fullerenes and silicon are very interesting materials because both of them can be used as creating special layers for layers. If we think about graphene, what is one atom layer of carbon on the layer, that thing would make a very hard surface. And the thing is that the graphene can put on the surface as the dust, where the pencil would cover the entire layer, and then the laser would remove other atom layers away until there would be one atom layer of carbon on the surface.

That thing can revolutionize things like material research.  Graphene has many targets for use from the tools to the layers of aircraft and space technology. The lightweight and extremely hard surfaces have many kinds of purposes in every target from everyday life to space technology. It can use to create harder components for mobile devices but the problem is how to remove extra atom layers from the graphite?

But the thing, what makes graphene more fascinating is that the technology, what is used to create this material can be used also for creating one atom layers from other elements. That means that the graphene would be very nice material itself, but it can be used in the same way the part of hybrid materials. In some scenarios, the graphene layer would be covered by a similar one atom layer of silicon, which makes the layer a very lightweight solar panel.

This kind of thing makes possible to create revolutionary aircraft and another kind of solutions. That kind of technology would improve the abilities of the long-range aircraft like U-2, which are used for extremely long-range intelligence operations. The graphene itself gives to that plane very hard covering layer, but if those layers could also produce electricity, that means that the layer would give more benefit to that aircraft.

One of the things is that those aircraft would need less fuel, and they can even shut down their engines during the flight because the solar panels would give electricity to the systems of that aircraft. And if the aircraft can glide in some parts of their missions, they would make longer operations.

Silicon- carbon hybrid fullerene would make possible to create an extremely small-sized fusion device, which can be launched by using simply the light. And this thing would make it interesting. That thing can use in the spacecraft, what is operating like "Orion", but uses fusion devices for giving the thrust. Replacing fission bombs by fusion, that vehicle could be more ecological.

But when we are thinking about the extremely large fullerene ball, what have billions of carbon atoms, we might think the situation, where that ball would cover by using the silicon atoms. Or it is simply put inside the silicon ball, that thing could make an interesting phenomenon. If there are small antennas inside the fullerene ball, what can be the metal atoms, that thing could create the electric arc inside that ball, and then there would be some gas like deuterium and tritium (or lithium), it can start the fusion reaction.

Of course, there is no need to be billions of carbon atoms in this kind of fullerene ball. Normal 110 atom fullerene, where is another layer of silicon atoms would make possible to create this kind of fusion reactor, which can have very many solutions like in the fusion rockets to nuclear weapons. The fusion rocket would shoot those fullerene pallets behind the spacecraft, and then the radio impulse would hit to them, which causes the explosion. But the silicon layer would make possible to use pure light in that kind of device.

Was the Teller's mistake with the "Castle Bravo" test caused because the bomb was warm?

Was the Teller's mistake with the "Castle Bravo" test caused because the bomb was warm?

"Castle Bravo" was 15 megaton thermonuclear test in Bikini-atoll 1954 during operation "Castle", what was first attempt to build the aircraft deliverable thermonuclear weapons.  The nuclear devices predicted power was 10 megaton, but it released the higher load of energy, than it should, and that caused injuries and destruction on the entire Bikini atoll.

That detonation was the first time when in the hydrogen bombs were used the lithium booster, what mission was to work as the fusion stage. Earlier hydrogen bomb tests "Greenhouse George" and "Ivy Mike", what was the first full-scale thermonuclear or fusion device test, and the power of that detonation was10 megaton.

The problem with "Ivy Mike" was that the device used cryogenic or low-temperature fusion stage, what based liquid helium 3 (or deuterium-tritium) fusion stage, what was ignited by using fission bomb. That kind of bombs was difficult to handle and store because the cryogenic fusion stage needs extreme low temperature.

So Edward Teller and Stanislaw Ulam created the idea to use lithium to create the thermonuclear explosion. If lithium would work as the booster the new high-yield thermonuclear weapons could store in the room temperature. And that thing interested the military forces in that time when the power of the nuclear weapon was the most important thing in the nuclear plans.

But when the "Bravo" or "Schrimpf" what was the name of that hydrogen bomb was detonated, the power of that device was 1,5 times more powerful, than it should be. The radioactive ash flew across the Marshall-islands. And after the year's people still asks, why those famous scientists made that error? The answer would be simpler than people will realize.

The bomb was warm, which means that the atoms in the launching capsule will oscillate, and that movement in the lithium caused that the greater mass of the thermonuclear stage started to melt together when the nuclear bomb at the next of the device is exploding.  That means the nuclear device would give very high energy output, and that thing increased the power of the device.

But the disaster could happen also because of the auxiliary fission would happen in a larger area than in the previous nuclear devices. And that would increase the speed of fusion, what releases more energy than predicted.

Structure of that bomb was simple. The fusion material was in the tube, what was around the natural uranium (U-238) stick. And when the detonator launched, the system would give extreme high energy burst, because the natural uranium transforms to the plutonium 239 (PU-239) and starts the fission inside the fusion material. Uranium-238 would catch the neutron and then transforms to plutonium-239. That thing hoped to help the ignition of the fusion material.

If the fission in that stick would limit in the core of uranium, that would cause that the transformation of uranium 238 to plutonium 239 would happen in the longer area than if the entire stick would start to transform, and that causes that the critical mass will reach in the larger area than Teller and Ulam predicted, what caused rougher reaction than it should be. This might cause one of the worst nuclear disasters in the history of nuclear tests.

https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Castle.html