What is the alternative explanation for the Brookhaven (Fermilab) observations?

The image above portraits the g−2 storage-ring magnet. That system Located at Fermilab. Originally researchers created that system for the Brookhaven g−2 experiment. The geometry allows for a very uniform magnetic field to establish in the ring. (Wikipedia/Muon g-2)

So what causes the interesting anomaly in the Brookhaven (Fermilab)low-energetic particle accelerator? The answer could be also a very weak gravitational effect. That turns the trajectory of the particle in the Muon g-2 experiment. If the fifth force is not existing could that thing that causes too strong curving in the Brookhaven laboratory be the gravitational wave of another universe? 

The thing is that the "fifth force" is much much weaker than the gravity. It's harder to see than other natural interactions. And there is the possibility that it's not even existed. But there is also the possibility that the scale of the "fifth force" is extremely large. 

Maybe it's visible only in the interactions of galaxies. Or maybe we could see the effect of this mystery from outside the entire universe. There is the possibility that the fifth force is not seen inside the universe because its form is a monotonic hum. In that case, we cannot see the changes of that force. 

Or if the effect of the fifth force can measure only between extremely large entireties that means we cannot see that thing. The other interactions are covering the fifth force. 

So another explanation why the mysterious "fifth force" is hiding is this: because the force is stable there is a problem with how to measure it. The "fifth force", if it exists is a similar wave-particle duality with other forces. 

But let's go to business and try to find out why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN has not seen the same things. Those are observed in the Brookhaven laboratory? The reason for that is simple. The LHC uses too much energy. And that means the weak interactions are not able to affect the trajectories of those particles. The Brookhaven laboratory uses much smaller energy loads than the LHC. And the weaker forces can affect the trajectories of the particles that are traveling in the accelerator of the Brookhaven laboratory. 

So if we are trying to compile why the Brookhaven accelerator is more suitable for observing weak natural interactions than the LHC we can use bullets as an example. The side wind would have more effect on the slow-flying bullet than the fast bullet. The reason for that is that the frontal pointing movement energy is higher in the fast-moving bullet. 

The wind effect of the slow-moving bullet is higher and the outcoming interaction like gravity wave is acting like the wind in the case of the bullet. At the first friction must slow the speed of the bullet so slow that the sidewind can push it out from the trajectory. 

The slow-moving low energetic particle is easier to push out from the trajectory than the fast-moving particle. The particle's speed in the LHC is near the speed of light. And the weak wave movement effect to so fast particles is harder to observe than the similar effect to the lower energetic and slower-moving particle. That's why Brookhaven laboratory sees anomalies that are not able to be seen by the LHC. 

()https://astronomy.com/news/2020/03/the-fifth-force-what-is-it

()https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-measure-the-magic-fine-structure-constant-20201202/#comments

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Standard model updates and the fifth force

The elementary particles of the Standard model

Should we update the standard model? Definitely yes. But the thing in that operation is that. Almost every single thing that is calculated and made in physics uses the standard model as the matrix. And in that case, there is the possibility that the calculations are wrong. If the standard model is wrong that means that all things bases on that model are wrong.

The Muon G-2 experiment and the experiments made after that experiment have shown that there is the possibility of the existence of the "Fifth force" or "fifth fundamental interaction". So if we are thinking of the standard model and the four fundamental interactions we must say that there is the possibility that the "fifth fundamental force" is even more dominating but at the same time weaker than gravitation. 

The reason why that thing is possible is that when the fundamental forces are turning weaker when their scale or effective distance is increasing. Gravitation is the only interaction that interacts in long distances.

So logically we can think that the fifth force interacts even longer distances than gravitation. That means the fifth force can help to solve the question of the existence of the multiverse. There is the possibility that the fifth force has similar wave-particle duality like all other fundamental forces except gravitation. 

If gravitation is the weakest known force, the reason for it may be simple. Gravitation would not be limited to the quantum field of the atom. And if we use allegories. The density of gravitation is lower than that of other basic interactions. The reason for this is that gravitation affects longer distances than three other fundamental interactions. 

The strength of the interactions rises when their range decreases. The reason for that could be that energy is trapped in some kind of quantum field. And that means the energy in those quantum fields cannot erupt. 

And it's not limited by the quantum field of the atom. Gravitons are the hypothetical transportation particles of gravitation. The existence of the graviton is predicted because all other fundamental interactions have the transportation particle. But because there is no observation about the graviton. There are discussions is gravitation one the independent interactions or not. 

And that means the hypothetical fifth force is interacting between even longer distances than gravitation. But the same way the fifth force is weaker than gravitation. So even if gravitation is the weakest of the known interactions it's the weakest of four interactions. 

The strongest of the interaction is the strong nuclear force. That force is the thing that keeps quarks in the protons and neutrons. The strong nuclear force affects only between quarks. The transporter particle of that force is the gluon which jumps between quarks. The answer for the strength of the strong nuclear force is maybe coming from the quantum field. 

When the gluon hits the quark it would touch the quantum field that is forming the core of the proton or neutron. The quantum field would also get energy outside the atom. And when the particles are hitting the quantum field. That thing acts like a lens and aims the energy back in its entirety called proton or neutron. 

Or energy can store in that quantum field. And when the mirror particle hits that quantum field like in proton-antiproton annihilation that thing will cause the quantum version of the electric arc. That thing is one of the most powerful reactions in nature. 

()https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677

()https://physicsworld.com/a/neutron-experiment-tightens-the-net-around-possible-fifth-force/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Images()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Thoughts about elusive fifth force

When Stephen Hawking made his theories about black holes those particles or objects were pure theory. The theory transformed into real models of the black holes when the first images of those objects are released. Today we know many supermassive black holes, but the only known stellar-mass black hole is still Cygnus X-1. 

More powerful tools in the observation and also data handling sides are the things. That is allowing to make the most accurate models than ever before. Artificial intelligence can follow billions of objects at the same time. It can also connect the data from multiple sources. 

And Those kinds of tools are important for creating new models for the universe and its internal, inter particular- wave movement interactions. The biggest error in some models is that people are thinking that the universe is stable. The universe is far away from its stable entirety. The massive energy bursts along with things like gravitational waves are opening new questions in material interaction. 

The new observations mean that the standard model of physics requires updates. There is strong evidence about the existence of the fifth natural force or fundamental interaction. So what is the fifth fundamental interaction? The fact is that if it is like the other natural forces. It should have particular and wave movement forms. 

Or wait a moment. The hypothetical transportation particle of gravity is called the graviton. There are no observations about the graviton. 

So the existence of that particle is not confirmed. The idea of the graviton is taken from other fundamental interactions. Those natural interactions have transportation particle and wave movement forms. But that duality is not seen in gravitation. 

The question is: what is the fifth natural force? The answer is that it could be some kind of wave movement. But what is the source of wave movement that causes errors in the trajectories of muons in Brookhaven laboratory? Could that radiation be some kind of Hawking radiation that comes from a higher dimension? The thing is that the fifth natural force is so elusive that it's hard to detect. It should be a very similar force with gravity. But weaker. 

Could somewhere in the universe lurking the "fifth force hole"? The hypothetical version of the black hole. The dominating effect of the black hole is gravitation. And the dominating effect of the fifth force hole is the fifth force. 

Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces(1). And if we are looking at black holes in those cases gravity feels less weak than we might think first. So is there possible that somewhere is the "fifth force hole"? That would be similar to the black hole. But the dominating effect of the fifth force hole is the fifth natural force that is very elusive. 

Can the fifth natural force be the thing that interacts between the extremely large material entireties? That means the fifth natural force could be the thing that can be seen in the cases where universe-class material entirety is interacting with other material. The fifth force is so weak that gravity will cover it. And if we are thinking logically the fifth force is the thing that will start to interact between atom groups. 

The strong nuclear force is the interaction between quarks. The weak nuclear force is the interaction in the nucleus of the atoms, electromagnetism is the interaction between the electron core. And the nucleus of the atoms. And gravity is the interatomic interaction. 

So logically thinking the next size of the interacting particles in the molecules. So is the fifth natural force the intermolecular interaction? Another explanation for the Brookhaven anomalies is that the gravitational effect of the mass that is outside our universe causes those errors. So is the fifth natural force some kind of radiation which source is in the other universe? If that thing can be proven by researchers that also means that the multiverse theory is true. 

()https://physicsworld.com/a/more-evidence-for-a-fifth-force-found-in-radioactive-decay-measurements/

()https://www.sciencealert.com/neutron-beam-interferometry-could-reveal-the-elusive-fifth-force-of-nature

(1)https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_X-1

Image():https://physicsworld.com/a/more-evidence-for-a-fifth-force-found-in-radioactive-decay-measurements/

The other dimensions and what they are?

The image above: The Cosmic Microwave Background as seen from the Planck satellite. Credit: ESA https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2013/03/Planck_CMB

There is the possibility that the higher dimensions are connected to the material. So the higher dimensions are energy levels of the material and space. When the energy level of the material rises too high it just drops out from the universe. We should say that the particle is jumping to an energy level that is so high that we cannot reach that particle. 

When we are thinking of the dimension as the room. We can think that particle is like the ball in the room. We can strike the ball. And it starts to jump. And if we are hitting the ball too hard it would jump through the wall. 

The ball acts like particle acts in the quantum world. When the energy is pumped to the particles like an electron its energy level rises. 

So that stressed particle will jump to a higher energy level. And soon the energy level is rising so high that the particle cannot stay in the dimension. 

In the case the particle's energy level rises too high will jump out from the dimension. Or if the particle is the ball, it jumps through the roof of the room. So it would not drop it would fly away from the third dimension. At this point, I must say that we usually think of the black hole the wrong way. 

The energy level of the black hole is so powerful that it is actually above the other particles. So if we are thinking dimension as the room the black hole or the area inside the event horizon is at the higher floor than regular material. So material would not fall into a black hole. The material would rise to the black hole. 

If the dimensions are like the superposition of the material. That explains why we cannot see those other dimensions.

That means the dimension is like the state in the qubit. In this version of the higher dimension theories, the material itself is the dimension. The idea is that the material is like a qubit. It has states that cannot connect with together. But the fact is that even if the material has dimensional states there could be also space-based dimensions. The space where is the so creased wave movement that we cannot observe it. 

The other dimensions are things that we cannot see or feel. We cannot imagine other dimensions because we cannot imagine anything that we haven't seen. And that is the thing that makes the other dimensions interesting. 

The big question in the discussions of the fourth and fifth dimensions is this: Are the fourth and fifth dimensions in space? Or are they connected with the material? In that case, the hypothesis goes like this. The space is in the interaction between material and wave movement. 

If the other dimensions are in the space, that thing will make them interesting research targets. There is no evidence of the interaction between the fourth and fifth dimensions with our third dimension. But sometimes some people have thought that the mysterious "fifth force" could be the effect of the energy that comes from higher dimensions. The idea is that photons are particles that are staying between the third and fourth dimensions. 

The dimensions are like floors. We cannot go through the floor or roof for reaching the higher dimensions. The term "higher dimension" means a higher energetic dimension. 

There is the possibility that the higher dimensions can interact with the material in our universe. That interaction happens through photons and hypothetical tachyon-particles. When the energy level of the tachyon decreases it will impact with photon, which throws it back to the fourth dimension. 

When the speed of a photon decreases. It gets energy from the third dimension and that thing accelerates it. When the speed of a photon rises too high, that thing will cause that the photon "calls" a hypothetical tachyon to it. And then the tachyon will push photons back to the space between the third and fourth dimensions. 

This thing is sometimes called tachyon symmetry. That term means that when the speed of energy level of some particle increases enough it will impact with tachyon. The hypothetical tachyon particle is the particle that is too energetic being in the third dimension. 

And the idea of the tachyon-photon symmetry is that the entire material is similar to light. The wave-particle duality proves that thing. But why we cannot see tachyon. The answer could be that tachyon is too energetic that we can observe it. 

Or is the higher dimension only the space where the wave movement has the wavelength that we cannot observe that wave movement? Is the higher dimension is the extremely short wave movement which wavelength is smaller than quarks? That means the fourth dimension could be the pack of extremely creased wave-particle entirety. 

()https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/three-totally-mind-bending-implications-of-a-multidimensional-universe?utm_source=dscfb&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dscfb

()https://www.multidimensionalman.com/Multidimensional-Man/Model_of_the_Multidimensional_Universe.html

()https://www.sciencealert.com/a-physicist-has-calculated-that-life-really-could-exist-in-a-2d-universe

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse