The quantum tugs between water molecules can be more fundamental than nobody even imagined.

"AN ANIMATION SHOWS HOW A WATER MOLECULE RESPONDS AFTER BEING HIT WITH LASER LIGHT... AS THE EXCITED WATER MOLECULE STARTS TO VIBRATE, ITS HYDROGEN ATOM (WHITE) TUGS OXYGEN ATOMS (RED) FROM NEIGHBORING WATER MOLECULES CLOSER, BEFORE PUSHING THEM AWAY, EXPANDING THE SPACE BETWEEN THE MOLECULES. THIS NEW VIEW OF AN EFFECT THAT’S THOUGHT TO BE BEHIND MANY OF WATER’S STRANGE PROPERTIES WAS CREATED WITH SLAC’S MEV-UED “ELECTRON CAMERA,” WHICH BLASTS SAMPLES WITH SHORT PULSES OF HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRONS TO LOOK INSIDE. CREDIT: GREG STEWART/SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY" (Image: https://scitechdaily.com/origin-of-waters-strange-properties-scientists-capture-a-quantum-tug-between-neighboring-water-molecules/)

The quantum tug between water molecules can be the thing that causes strange properties. But that thing can also open the road to understanding things like gravitation better. And the great question is, can the gravitation base the same way to quantum tugs as the strange interaction between water molecules. 

There is also the possibility that between all other atoms and molecules is the quantum tugs. That are explaining the three elements of the material are solid, liquid and gas.

The quantum tug between water molecules can be the thing that causes strange properties. That thing is interesting because other materials have the three states of matter, liquid, solid, gas. Oops, I forgot the plasmatic state of matter, and the water also acts like plasma in the strong magnetic fields. The polarity of water molecules causes that the magnets can affect to those molecules. 

But the thing is that also metals and other materials are turning to liquid and gas while the temperature is rising high enough. That thing means that there could (or will) be quantum tugs between the atoms and molecules. That are forming the other materials like iron or silicon. The reason why water is turning to gas or vapor. Can be found that the distance between the molecules rises too high when the temperature rises. And the quantum tugs cannot touch the molecules anymore. 

The melting process of the materials is always similar. The rising temperature causes that the material turns softer and then it will turn liquid. So that means the process that happens in the water is similar to iron atoms. 

And the quantum tugs can explain why the metals and other materials are turning superconducting in low temperatures. While the electron is facing the quantum tug, where is the hole or the tug is separated that jump between molecules takes the energy from the electron.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx

The quantum brains 

The quantum tugs can make it possible to make the "quantum brains" the quantum neurocomputer, the most powerful data handling tool that has ever been imagined. In that system, the quantum tugs are acting as the synaptic gaps. 

The quantum tugs are causing the idea that this thing can be used for making microscopic artificial neurons. That thing makes it possible to make the "quantum brains" the quantum nervous computer. The quantum neuro computer is one of the most powerful data handling tools that have ever been imagined. 

In that case, the rows of the water molecules, some other ions or electrons can connect to the corners of the fullerene molecule. That system is extremely fast and powerful hybridization between quantum and neurocomputer. That thing can be the revolutionary design in learning computers. 

Learning process in the world of computers is simply expanding the number of the skill. Or otherwise saying the number of stored and sorted data in databases and connections between those databases are increasing when computer learns. 

In quantum neural computers, the qubits or electrons are acting as neurotransmitters. The electrons are traveling between the molecules in the quantum wires that are created by the rowed ions. And the quantum tugs are acting in the same role as the synaptic gaps in the human nervous system. And the role of the electrons or qubits in this system is the same. As the neurotransmitters in the living nervous system. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The quantum tugs can be the same way revolutionary with the fifth natural force. 

Is the origin of the quantum tugs in the movement of gluons between the quarks? The quantum tug is the movement in the quantum field of the atoms. That are forming the molecules. So is some kind of quantum tug behind the gravitation?

The quantum tugs are moving between molecules like gluons are moving between the quarks in the protons and neutrons. So can there be some particle that moves between the electrons and nucleus of the atom? And can the quantum tug be the key to mysterious gravitation?

Is gravitation the group of quantum tugs between planets and other great atomic groups? The idea is that gravitation is the quantum tugs that are getting more power for their punch when there are larger groups of atoms behind them. If the large group of atoms is kicking quantum tugs. That gives them more force than the kick of the single quarks. 

The gluons are forming similar quantum tugs between quarks like the atoms of water molecules are forming quantum tugs between other molecules.  And if we are concluding that the same effect continues also in the larger scale structures the gravitation could also be some kind of group of the quantum tugs. 

There are lots more quarks behind those kicks than the quantum tugs between the protons and neutrons. They are interacting longer distances than if there is only a couple of the molecules behind the punch of the quantum tugs. So the quantum tugs are taking their energy from the quantum fields of the atoms. 

And the fundamental idea is that the quantum tugs are the key to gravitation or the fifth fundamental interaction. So quantum tug is the effect that is forming in the movement of gluons. Travels through the nucleus of atoms and electron core turn to gravitation that travels across the universe. 

Can the quantum tug be the key to the GUT (Grand Unified Theory)? Is it the magic stick, that helps to connect the gravitation with other fundamental interactions? The fundamental interaction means the same as a fundamental force because all of the forces (strong and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism, and gravitation) are at the same time pulling and pushing particles. 

As an example, the gravitational interaction means that Earth is pulling the dropping apple to it. But Apple is also pulling Earth to it. So the Earth and Apple are both moving but we cannot just measure the movement of the Earth because it is too small for the measure. 

So the quantum tugs are the things that are moving back and forth between the molecules. Just like gluons are moving between the quarks inside the protons and neutrons. That observation can be the same way revolutionary in the world of physics like some fifth fundamental interaction. That quantum tug between molecules can take researchers closer to find the mysterious graviton. 

And why I wrote this? The reason for that is that if we are thinking the matter from the smallest particles to the biggest entirety we might see that the reactions and interactions that are happening between the subatomic particles like quarks and gluons should happen between the larger structures. 

Now research is found a similar interaction between molecular structures that are happening between quarks. So is there some kind of quantum tugs or groups of quantum tugs between the macro-molecules like planets and stars?

If something happens between the water molecules that thing should also happen between larger materials structures. So is the gravitation of the tugs between the large molecular structures? Can the quantum tug between the water molecules answer the question, "why the gravitation is so different than other fundamental interactions"? And can the quantum tug be the key to the GUT (Grand Unified Theory)? The magic stick combines the fundamental interactions to the most fundamental theory in history. 

()https://bigideas.network/the-fabric-of-reality/physics/the-4-fundamental-interactions

()https://scitechdaily.com/origin-of-waters-strange-properties-scientists-capture-a-quantum-tug-between-neighboring-water-molecules/

()https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

()https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model#:~:text=The%20Standard%20Model%20%28SM%29%20of%20physics%20is%20a,is%20the%20one%20the%20model%20does%20not%20explain.

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-quantum-tugs-between-water.html

Black holes in our solar system

 

Black holes in our solar system

Under this text is a link to an article that is published in the Business Insider magazine. There is writing about the possibility that we have a black hole in our solar system(1).  

There is one very interesting thing Could we have a black hole in our solar system? (2) Could this be possible? When we want to observe black holes, we must realize that we cannot get observations straight from the black hole. We see the disk of material around it, and here I must say, that we see only the radiation, what comes around the black hole. But inside the point, where escaping velocity would across the speed of light we cannot get the observation. 

And that means that we see black holes only when something drops inside them. So if the black hole is orbiting the star in the area, where is not material, that thing would cause that the radiation, what comes from the black hole would be very hard to notice. Or in other scenarios, the material that is dropped in the black hole is pure helium or hydrogen, because the black hole would act similar way with planets, and they will sweep other particles from their trajectory. 

That means that the light particles, that are dropped in the black hole would not send very strong radiation, which is hard to detect from the Earth, because it is sending in the form of X-ray frequency. That weak radiation would be lost in the background radiation. There have been speculations that near our solar system can be the very small black hole, what size would be about basketball. 

But what could form that kind of black hole? The answer would be that the antimatter explosion could form those really small black holes, which can exist about thousands or millions of years. Those periods are extremely short if we are thinking them at the point of view of the ages of stars like the sun. But even if those black holes would vaporize in a short period, that thing will take a very long time, if we compare that thing to the lifetime of a human. 

The vaporization time depends on the things, how much material the black hole can pull inside. And the stars would give the energy to those black holes, which means that the existing time of the small black holes is extremely hard to predict. The vaporization means that sometimes the black holes are losing photons, and what smaller the mass of this supermassive particle goes the loss of photons would increase. 

And sooner or later the black hole has finished its existence. When a black hole is in the space, the black holes cannot get anything to eat, and that means that they cannot get more energy. But if the black hole is near the star, that will feed it with energy, and that kind of thing can increase the lifetime of the black holes, which is extremely small. 

(1)

https://www.businessinsider.com/astrophysicists-found-black-hole-in-solar-system-planet-2019-11?utm_content=buffer194e2&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&r=US&IR=T

(2)

https://www.livescience.com/tiny-ancient-black-hole-planet-nine.html

Image:

https://www.spaceanswers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-hole-in-Solar-System.jpg

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

In the world of science is forgotten one of the most interesting things, what we face always in real life. That thing is artificial intelligence, which can be used for handling multiple points in the calculations and observations. The thing is that artificial intelligence can handle billions of variables, and that thing causes conflicts with classical formulas in many areas.

Many of the classic formulas of classic mechanics like Kepler's point have been calculated by using two or three points, and modern computer technology can notice billions of points, and it can also mean that the smallest effective forces can be noticed. This thing means that we must confess, that even the farthest objects affect the particles, which are moving in some trajectories. We cannot meter that effect while the stress to the particle takes about two weeks or even months.

But when the effect continues even thousands of years they can cause the effect, what has mean. And when we are thinking about things like spaceflights, we must remember, that there are many other forces than just gravity, what effects to the trajectory. One thing is the solar wind, which will warm the spacecraft. That thing causes that the small particles are flying away from the craft, and the recoil force would turn it away from the course. That thing affects if the craft is flying tens of years.

Every particle affects other particles in the Universe

Also, the RTG generators, what is used in the space probes would cause that the radioactive particles will push the craft to the trajectory, which is not predicted. That thing can cause minimum errors in the trajectory, what can be measured. In the universe, every particle is in interaction with other particles and that thing causes errors in the calculations. Those errors have no mean in normal life.

But they can be measured. And when we are thinking about the minimum errors in the trajectory of particles like comets, that kind of thing can cause the false alarms of the new planets. The thing is that if the frozen nitrogen is in some part of the asteroid, and there would be the pocket of helium, the radiation can cause the jettison, which would turn the movement of the particle.

The thing is that the old-time scientists were not wrong. That means that the advanced measurement methods have caused the calculations to have turned sharper. The modern supercomputers can also use float decimal numbers, which contains even millions of numbers. That causes the systems to have more accuracy than any scientists in the world.

No human can handle numbers where are thousands of decimals. Or they cannot handle the gravity force of thousands of background stars, what is affecting the particles in every solar system. And that thing is causing the revolution in the world of science.  Computers can connect also the extreme weak variables to the calculations, and that makes them the ultimate tool for research and scientific work.

Radial particle accelerator

Radial particle accelerator

Do you know, what is the radial particle accelerator? It is the machine, what is created for material research, and the mission of that system, what looks a little bit like a radial piston engine, what would shoot the ionized material in the central point of that system. So in this multiple accelerator system, the accelerators would be in the form, what is looking like a radial engine. The mission of that system is to use small energy particle accelerators for impacting many ionized atoms together by creating new superheavy elements, what is existed only a couple of nanoseconds.

The idea is that the radial accelerator can shoot more ions at the same point than the normal particle accelerator. This kind of system is sometimes used in fusion experiments. In Sandia laboratories, this kind of system is used for creating so-called impulse fusion. The idea is that the system would shoot those ions together, and at the same time, it would need less energy than Tokamak or torus systems because the ions are pulling each other together.

But the radial accelerators might have history, what people would not usually know. Those systems were planned to use in the hypothetical spacecraft known as "Kosmokrator". The idea of this system is that the normal nuclear reactor would give power to the radial accelerators, which would create superheavy radioactive elements for the motor of that system. This kind of spacecraft would open the road to the entire solar system.

The idea is that by using ionized Uranium, Iron or some other element, the accelerators would shoot those atoms together, and then then the formed element, what would be existed in a couple of nanoseconds would be used as the fuel of the high power reactors. The fusion of iron might seem very impractical because it needs outer energy to sustain, but that would help to create the super heavy and very radioactive elements for high power reactors because the storage of those elements is very difficult, and there is easier to create them by using fusion. But this system is only one theoretical spaceship, which has been created during history.

There is one other remarkable system, where the radial particle accelerator would be useful. During the Cold War, the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) defense program some scientists suggested the system, where magnetized plutonium or uranium powder would shoot in the chamber, where would be created the fission reaction. That system would create the most massive particle flow in the space, what people have ever seen. And the thing is that that kind of system could destroy incoming missiles and cause the very strong EMP-pulses to the atmosphere. That ion layer would deny the communication between satellites and clients and EMP pulse can destroy the electronics all over the Earth.

Image
https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/research_magazine/articles/2017/03/images/z_machine_600.jpg

Fascinating way to think

Fascinating way to think

Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".

They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.

And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.

Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.

We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.

Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.

The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.

Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.

The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.

Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

The grand idea of physicists is to create a theory, that contains every particle of the area of physics. And the problem of this thing is that other theories would not find harmony with new theories. The thing is that Einstein's and Newton's theories have conflict, and because of the theory of Special Relativity cannot fit the quantum theory, which means that the world of those people is collapsed. If they cannot create the formula, which contains everything in the Universe, that thing would mean that everything cannot be introducing with mathematics. So this is the problem with theoretical and practical science.

At this point, we must say that Einstein created his famous formula for about ten years. People think that creating some formulas is a very easy job, and they might be really interesting things, but then the mathematical formulas must fit the observations and don't worry, that thing is the most fascinating and at the same time difficult part of science. So what the scientists wait, when they are using some instrument.

Could photon captured inside the quark?

They might wait years the situation, that the photon would impact with another photon or quark in some laser ray, that thing could ever happen, but some people believe that kind of possibility, where photon goes inside the quark like in pocket. The thing would be extremely short projection, where photons would capture inside the quark.  There is a strange theory that photons can merge with other photons or quark. That theory is one of the most fascinating and at the same time unbelievable claim in history. There is not single prove that photons can capture by quark, but if that thing is possible that could revolutionize many things.

The thing what scientist could wait is a theoretical thing, what is called as the photon fusion, there is a little possibility, that the photons can merge, but that reaction cannot even prove. The reason for that theory is that because almost everything in the universe can be impact together, so why photons can merge or quarks, as well as quarks and atoms,  do together, do in the high-energy reactions.

But there is no way that we could prove that thing because for that thing would need the photon or quark, what has extremely high energy, or what comes in the right direction. That thing would prove that photon has mass or there could be some reactions between photons, what we will not know. And the people, who are making those investigations would just in that time cut the electricity off from laser when the suitable photon or quark comes to atmosphere.

That thing would cause this kind of reaction, which is impossible at this moment ever detected. This thing is the most incredible scenario. Just at the moment, when some theories can be proven that the system would turn off in a couple of seconds. But the extremely long laser rays have confirmed the thing, what is called as the gravity wave true.

Gravity waves

LIGO-system has detected those waves at the moment when two black holes have collided and in this kind of case the gravity wave would cause that the laser ray would be flattened like some kind of tube, and that thing would not seem like some kind of seismic action. But for hunting those gravity waves the laser ray must be extremely long, and the length of that laser ray in LIGO is over 3000 kilometers. That distance makes possible to see, how the laser ray would be flattened.

But if we would want to create a more sensitive sensor, we would need longer laser rays. In some scenarios to the edge of the solar system would send two or three probes, where is laser systems. Those lasers would form the sensor, what size is the same as the solar system, and those laser rays could measure weaker gravity waves than any system before it.

About small impact craters on the moon, the orange mineral and space laboratories

About small impact craters on the moon, the orange mineral and space laboratories

Those small impact craters with orange mineral or orange glass, what Apollo 17 and the Chinese moon probe has been seen might be caused simply for the seismic tests, what has made with the moon. In those tests, there is formed the artificial earth- or in this case the moonquake by shooting the moon with some items.

I don't know, how many of those tests have been made, and the thing is that those tests can be used by creating the image of internal areas of the moon. The image of the nucleus of the moon is very important if there is planned to build some moon stations. If the inner of the moon is melted, there would be the quakes, what might destroy the entire base.

The Chinese moon lander has shown that there is no manned base behind the moon, but when we are thinking the moon base, we always forget something. The moonbase, what is reserved for the biological experiments is not probably large, and it can operate automatically. In this kind of cases, the small probe would be enough, and that ecosphere what is modeled in that capsule must not probably be some amazon rainforest.

We must not even go to the moon for simulating microgravity. The only thing, what is needed is the satellite, what looks like a barrel, what is rotating around its axel. Then there would be put the things like cabbages, and algae, what is forming oxygen. And then the test animal might be selected from the normal laboratory animals like guinea pigs, what would live in that satellite.

The rotation speed would adjust that it would create artificial gravity, which is similar to the moon. Also by adjusting the rotation speed of those miniature versions of O'Neill artificial planets. The idea of those laboratory satellites would be that they are acting like those artificial words, what Gerald O'Neill sketched.

If we think a small size biological test satellites, their rotation speed can adjust freely, and that means those systems can use to simulate any gravity field of the solar system. So that means those satellites can be used to find out could there be the primitive organisms somewhere in our solar system. The satellite must equip with windows, what is filtering the sunlight to the level, what it is at the distance of Europa moon.

 For those tests, the test team would need only the chemical analysis from the water, what is found in some moon as an example of Jupiters Europa. Then the water and minerals that are found from Spectroanalysis of that water will be modeled in a laboratory.

After that, the rotation of the satellite would adjust to match with Europa moon gravity, and the organisms would be released to that water. Then the microscopes will follow the advantages, what are happening in the testbeds. And maybe on the Earth would be microbes, what can live in those conditions, what is important, when someday to the Europa is sending the probe, what can answer the existence of the alga and even higher organisms like crustacean in the ocean of that moon.

Other civilizations and changing attitudes for things, what was self-evident in the past

Other civilizations and changing attitudes for things, what was self-evident in the past

When we are talking about things like other civilizations, we must go back to history and remember many TV-shows where the humanoids were some kind of joke. In that time there were no observations about other solar systems and in some popular scientific publications had the line that there would be no other solar systems and civilizations universe.

But as we know to develop the new type of telescopes what have new accuracy, there are observations about thousands of exoplanets. The last scientific news about the field of planet-hunting is the exoplanets, what are orbiting the Alpha Centauri, which makes possible that also double stars have planets. There are also remarkable observations about planets, what are orbiting stars, what is like the sun, but the observation of the multi-stellar system, what has planets are fascinating.

And when we are thinking about the forming of the planetary systems, we must realize that the brown dwarf can simply turn the planets to orbit it. In this kind of cases, the massive planet could have massive earth-size moons. But this is not writing about special cases, like planets that are orbiting the center star of the double-star system what members are far away from each other.

In that kind of cases, the planet could orbit between stars, and it might have life forms, what are active only a short period of the year of that planet. In this hypothetical case so-called open double-star systems where another member is in distance, what is the same, with a distance of Neptune, both stars might have own planetary system.

What if we would make contact with another civilization? Or rather saying, get signal from other civilization? First, we must understand that civilization could be very far away from us, and things like gravity lenses might focus that signal to our planet. That means that the signal would be visible only when the alien planet is in the right direction, which means that we could hear that signal only once.

So in those cases, we cannot even answer, if we want. And the second question is should we answer? If the aliens are hostile, we would be in big trouble. When we are facing another civilization, we must realize that the finding that thing would be the greatest scientific exploration, what we can think, and this kind of things are really difficult questions.

What we must do is to observe those signals, and then try to break their communications, and that thing is one of the most important things in the research. We should know exactly, who we would talk if we would someday answer. And before we would tell other people and the great audience about the aliens, we must say, that in that kind of cases, we would not need any kind of joke calls to those humanoids, or that thing could be really bad things.

So in this kind of things, we should hide the location of the star, where the signal has been coming. That would help the researchers to find out, what kind of thing is sending that message or signal. Here we must realize, that if the human race would someday receive the signal from another solar system, that would be the end of the era, that we would be only one intelligent civilization.

But the research of the possible extraterrestrial civilizations has been shown, how the attitudes are chancing also in the society, what is outside of the scientific community. The freedom of speaking about extraterrestrial civilization has been also symbolizing the changed attitudes, what science has been faced. There are many researches, which were not possible about ten to fifteen years ago, and one is the research about gender.

When I was young the gender was simply sex organs. That was enough, and until now we are faced that there are also other people than men and women, and that has been opened the eyes of the people, that the attitudes about the things, what were self-evidence are more complicated.

The mystery of alien megastructure has almost solved

The mystery of alien megastructure has almost solved

The alien megastructure or one of the claimed alien megastructures has been solved, and the reason for the unusual change of brightness of the star has been uncovered the asteroids, what is orbiting the star in the unusual cluster. So there might not be civilization, what would be the scientific sensation of the millennium.  

One of the things about that kind of things or structures in the universe is that we must get better observations and use the best possible equipment before we say something about those things. That kind of ideas that there could be alien civilizations are only one track in the lines of research. But we must keep our mind open when we are talking about the alien civilizations. 

We cannot remove any kind of solutions before observations. And then we must realize, that we should dare to introduce different opinions about things, what has been introduced as the scientific facts. In philosophy and science, we must realize that people need very good poker face if they want to tell that they have different opinions with the so-called big thinker. But if we want to change things, we must dare to do that. We must say something, what is different than the common opinion. 

Great scientists have always faced some kind of a cheat, and one of the best examples are the "jokes" where Charles Darwin was introduced as a monkey. Would you think that this kind of things is feeling nice? And after a long time, I sometimes think, that what the drawer of that image wanted to show? Was that person believed in being fun? 

But maybe those things allowed that the evolution theory was denied. Maybe there was some kind of voting campaigns, that how many people believed that Darwin's theory of evolution was accepted or deny. And the side, who won that election would get a bottle of beer for that thing. This kind of things is increasing the assertiveness of science. The main purpose of scientists is always fall theories, what younger colleagues have been introduced, and repeating words, what famous people have said. The science is meaning that all evidence about things is collected before the judgment has been given.

In some writings is visible the attitude, that the use of own brains is always prohibited in places like University unless it supports people own opinions. And if somebody dares to introduce other opinions what have not included the texts, what are published before those people, that would cause laughs. 

We are forgetting that we should trust some writings, and if writer shares information about what is faked for purpose or some other reasons not true, the responsibility for that information is the person who has written the original article. Not persons who use the trusted platform as the source for their articles. 

If the original article is published in the respected magazine, the people have the right to believe that the article is properly checked. And if the images are made by using photoshop, that thing would seem a very good joke. But it might cause the extra work for astronomers, who are using those images in their texts as the source. 

So when we are looking at the news about the cosmic megastructures, we must remember that we have only the knowledge, what is delivered in the news, and if we want to produce the new data about the object, we must buy the very large telescopes. So before we cannot get precise information about the object, we should make very big investments, or wait that somebody else is publishing the more precise data about that kind of things. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tabbys-star-kic-8462852-mystery-explained-dust-cloud-2017-10?utm_content=buffer89e1f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&fbclid=IwAR0B2zjEOA3cHKRIOEbrKVfKFFZUXYbjzpZeI5arwSRNwZysj2rDdaVjG6Q&r=US&IR=T

The writing about the way to make science

The writing about the way to make science

I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.

One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.

Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.

The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.

But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.

If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.

We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.

And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.

The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.

If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.