Four possibilities can cause a collapse in the world's economy.

1) The housing market crisis is brewing again.

Payment difficulties for those who have taken out jumbo loans have increased in the USA. And those kinds of loans are taken for housing. So those people are bought homes, but then they cannot pay their loans back to the bank. That thing causes problems. 

Because even if those homes are foreclosed for banks. That thing doesn't mean that the bank ever gets its money back. Banks must sell those apartments. That there is even a possibility to get the money back. And if nobody offers enough the rest of the loan turns to bad debt. If there is enough bad debt that can cause bankruptcy for banks. That causes bank crises. And the trust in markets is gone.

When that loss of trust in economics happens in a large- worldwide economic area or area that has a big influence on the world's economy, it can cause the situation. That this area pulls the entire world into an economic downturn with it. The fact is that a financial boom and an economic upturn cannot continue forever. There is always an economic downturn after the economic upturn. 

The housing market crisis is one of the things that cause problems for the economy. The problem is not that the housing flats are not produced, or they are not produced enough. The problem is where to get money for funding that thing? If there are lots of housing squares the price of those housing squares is decreasing like in all other forms of inflation. One of the reasons for the housing market crisis is that when people are made money in the town they want to move to own house. 

And the thing that makes this thing problematic is that when those people's children are getting cheap land area they are not willing even to move to towns. That leaves the apartment buildings empty. When only a few people are living in some apartment buildings that rises the costs for single people. 

When some people are buying a new flat there is the possibility that they cannot sell their old flats. And that causes problems in the financial business. If people cannot pay their loans that thing turns into bad debt and falls to the state. The thing is this. The problem with housing squares is that no one wants to pay those housing squares. If government produces the flats for the people and pays for those flats that will not bring any money to the state. 

2) Domino effect of the raw material. 

When the need for raw materials is rising that means the production cannot fill the hole. So the raw materials must produce in new areas. And some of those areas are politically unstable. The thing that makes producing raw materials complicated is that people would not accept things like slave work. Also, things like guerilla movements are controlling some raw material sources. 

And that thing causes also political problems. Buyer of those raw materials acts as a supporter of terrorism. But the fact is that things like lanthanides that are important in high-tech products are not very common. The resources of Earth are not endless. That's why decreasing Earth's resources can cause a collapse of the economy. And the race for decreasing natural resources and food is causing conflicts. When one raw material is ending that thing causes a chain reaction, because some of those extraordinary metals are needed to produce other metals. 

3) Death spiral of Euro-area. 

When demand is falling that brings pressure to raise prices. The reason for that is that entrepreneurs must replace the lack of the incoming money that they can pay for their expenses like raw materials and business premises. The problem with that is that can cause a situation where the customer's loss increases. 

The death spiral means an effect where lack of customers is causing the rise in the prices. Then that will cause a chain reaction where the new prices are banishing more customers. Sooner or later the price of the product rises so high, that nobody buys it anymore. And they are starting to look for alternative solutions. 

4) China's expanding problems.

China is one of the biggest marketing environments in the world. But the major problem of that nation is that the regular people have no money to buy things like mobile telephones. The fact is this. Even if China is a big economical area that area is not endless. There is always a limit when people will not buy things like tablets and mobile telephones anymore. And when the demands in that area end, China is lost. That thing affects the entire world and its economy. 

The biggest problem with China is that it's not an open nation. There is hard to get confirmed information about the economic situation in that country. And the second problem is that the Chinese authoritarian government makes people afraid that something happens to them. The authoritarian and corrupted authorities are the thing that can cause many problems for people who are visiting those countries. 

Another problem with production in China is that people are awakening about the freedoms and merchandise products in the country, which is very authoritarian and is negative marketing for those products. And another thing is national security. 

The aggressive willingness to expand its territorial waters, especially in the South China Sea causes other governments to want to limit the production of mobile devices in China because the Chinese military can get benefit from those products. 

Because only a couple of words against the government cause arrest there is always the possibility that somebody has written something on social media in the name of the person who visits China. And that thing causes problems. Also, there is the possibility that the investors are losing their investments. Because authorities seized that money. 

But also things like the possibility that the government's attitude to companies is turning negative. The fact is that those governments like large-scale companies. And they don't support micro-entrepreneurs. That kind of thing means that China is not a very promising operational area for start-up companies that have no relationships with authorities. 

What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

Rudolf Meidner and his relationship with Palme

Rudolf Meidner and his relationship with Palme

Why Meidner said that the ownership of 52% was suitable for employees? Why not 68-70%?

Rudolf Meidner introduced an idea, that the workers, who would work in the certain-size companies would be allowed to buy the stocks of the company, by using the funds, what is put for the workers, who would buy the parts of the company by using the focused stock selling (1). And after 20 years the workers would own 52% of the company. So where Meidner took that number? Why he didn't use numbers 60-70%? Why 52% was suitable ownership? This is one of the most interesting things in the Meidner-Rehn model, which is called market-economical socialism. 

The idea of this model was that the workers would feel more responsible for their work, but many people said, that those funds would be a dangerous step to socialism. And as I have written before in Finnish, there is a one really interesting thing, and that is that China is following this model or has adapted a part of the Meidner model to its economy. I have written this thing in here: https://yhteisojahistoria.blogspot.com/2019/11/rudolf-meidner-ja-markkinatalous.html

The role of Olof Palme (1927-1986) in those funds

Were the powerful demonstrations of the entrepreneurs in the early 1980s caused that some unstable person shot Palme? This thing is hard to prove because there are not convictions about this case. And that means the murder of Palme is still unsolved. 

But let's go tho think about the relationship with Meidner and Olof Palme. The prime minister of Sweden, who was supporting Meidner and his model. The thing, why the employers were resisted the model, what Meidner created was that it would turn the Economical model of Sweden to socialist. But there was one really interesting thing, and that thing is that this kind of ownership would be brought workers to the same table with employers, and that thing could uncover something, what those people didn't want other people to say. 

So the thing that makes this thing very interesting is that the funds for employees were supported also the man named Casimir Ernroth in Finland. That man was one of the most influential men in the Finnish industry. And the support for those funds was a surprise for everybody. But then we have forgotten that Enroth might be thought that other people would fall those funds, even if they were operating in his own company. 

And when Palme was taken the seat as the prime minister in the early 1980s the social democratic party began that program, but the party was not united. There was resistance in the government, and some people thought that the support, that Palme gave to those funds was not unlimited. Sometimes I have thought, that in many of those cases the supporters would expect that some other person would fall that kind of thing. Olof Palme was murdered in 1986, and the case is still open. 

There are many speculations about the murderer, and there have been many speculations about this case, and one is that those funds have caused the death of Palme because the demonstrations were so powerful, and some people, who had some kind of emotional touch with those things shot Palme. But had Palme something to do with those funds, except he permitted to establish them? But there are many other theories about this case. And the powerful demonstrations are feeding the fantasies and hallucinations of the people, who have an unstable mind. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_funds

(2)

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palkansaajarahastot

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle said, that the right to give votes must reserve to "free men" because they have the best knowledge about the things, and then about a thousand years after that the voting right expanded to belong also for free women. And that caused a revolution for democracy, but then we have forgotten something, and that is here in the modern time is still many people, who have not right to give votes in any elections.

Those people are handicapped, ward, underage or foreigners, who would not have citizenship, and that's why those people have not right to vote in elections. And that means that the model of Aristotle is still in power. That kind of action, what is limiting the democracy is meant for protecting the state. And this means that they are so-called "necessary evilness", which means that the state must deny the situation, that two million foreigners would come to its territory and votes to the involved in some other country.

But the question is, why youngsters' opinions about the laws are not ever asked? Maybe there is no time for that. But when we are thinking about democracy, and the principle that vote cannot be bought, the answer is a little bit complicated than we ever thought, and the answer would be that there are people, who would buy votes.

Those people would offer more salary, lower taxes and another kind of thing, but there is one problem, the government would need that money, and even the taxes of salaries would be low, the taxes of the food, fuel and another kind of stuff would rise. And this is one thing, what we cannot even think about. If we would want to crush our political opposition, we might call our leaders as the "expert", and that thing would make those people more trusted in the eyes of the great public than world "leader". "

An "Expert" is one of the worlds, which shows real professionalism, and that would be a really good argument in the political discussions. But when we are thinking about "free men", we must realize that in modern times Aristotle would say "free persons" are only capable individuals for making decisions, because they have "right knowledge". But then we should ask, what exactly means "free person"?

Does that mean some businessman or maybe the specialist of administration? Or is it a person, who is a member of the ring, what makes decisions? And who would get the place in this hypothetical ring? Is that the person, who has the right training, and that training could be free to get. But then we must realize, that the high price of those, maybe administrative training would be a good way to eliminate not wanted persons from that training. This is one point of view of those things.

And censorship is a very bad thing in a democracy. If we are thinking election campaigns is not tolerated to deny to print the campaign material of some candidate by using political arguments, rejecting the offer by using argument, that we don't want to print that material we would be childish. If the price of that material would be so high, that person cannot pay it, that will be a very good alternative for political censorship. In this model, political marketing and campaign commercials would be under the heavy tax. And that would make them very expensive.

But if we would give the announcement, that thing would be tax-free, and then the parties, what are under the power would pay a lower price for their commercials because their commercials are interpreted as the announcements. Because opposition cannot pay the prices, their candidates would not get their commercials to the media. And this is the good and non-violent way to make sure, that the same persons would be in the control of the state.

Solving problems in the Third World with those people is the new way to think about problems

Solving problems in the Third World with those people is the new way to think about problems

In the beginning, the new eay to think about helping people is to help them to help themselves. That means that the western nations would tech local operators to make new solutions for their problems. And then the local actors can share their knowledge with other locals. That would be the road to sustaining and positive advantages in those areas, where the cooperation projects would be done. The target of those projects is to increase the knowledge with the social and economic conditions in those areas.

I know that talking about financial benefits from research projects might feel a strange thing in the eyes of people. But those arguments must also be noticed, when we are agumenting the need for some research for people, who makes desicions. They are many times think that there is always some domestic target in the same line with international research projects. And the funding is easier to get if that research would also bring the finanzial benefit for the industry or somehow else increases the national benefit of those projects.

One of the main problems in environmental research and things like protection of nature is how to integrate ordinary people in those projects. When we are thinking about the social and economic problems of places like Africa, we must confess to normal people, that it's also their benefit that some places are protected as environment, what needs the biodiversity.

The research would be a good way to the front of the eyes of the people, how good and beautiful some area could be, and maybe locals would also understand the values of natural animals and the environment to things like tourism. Tourism would bring extra-value for those areas, and bring money to the local people and also local government.

That kind of areas would give also the opportunity to research the African culture like their stories, and one of the things that this kind of thing can make possible is to make people and also western companies to interest the co-operation with African nations. In the area of high-tech agriculture, we might rather talk about data-oriented agricultural solutions, which are using less electric power, and that thing could be done by using intelligent technology. In this vision, the system would be equipped with artificial intelligence, which uses electric power, only when it is needed to use.

That would make things like solar panels and other sources of "green energy" even more effective, what they have been. And that kind of thing is making things interesting, and show the value of education also for the African people. Raising the educational level would make society more stable, and that thing helps to solve the internal problems of the nations of the third world. The problem for the projects has been that they are seen as one-sided.

But as you see northern Europe is the same way exotic to those people, and they might want also to see and research arctic environments during that kind of research cooperation. The thing in the data-oriented system is to handle the changing water supply. During the raining seasons, the system can collect rainwater to tanks, and during the dry seasons, the water can be released to some areas.

If we are thinking about the use of water supply, it can also be used for making electric power for intelligent systems. the system can observe the growth of corn by using a special metering system that might base to laser, which observes the growth of the corn by using extreme sharpness. That allows collecting data from the daily advantage of those corns. If we are thinking about the opportunity for industry, those areas are offering a suitable platform to introduce the knowhow about the Finnish industry.

This is why we should be involved more openly in those projects, where is collected data and analyze them in many places on Earth. That can allow us to create automated laboratories for field use. And also those systems, that will transmit data by using satellites might use to integrate local people and educational systems to those projects. They can help to protect nature and also gives Europeans the knowledge of the African environment.

But here we must say, that Europe and especially northern Europe is the same way exotic as Africa is for Europeans. That cooperation allows African scientists to research polar animals and other things like northern lights. The major thing is how to make people interesting in the possibility to make something big for making the Earth a better place to live.

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Society has turned to two class people because the economical middle class is lost. That makes very big differences to things like economical and tax planning. Also, the middle class people had a role to work as the shock absorber between wealthy and poor people, and that causes problems with society.

The middle class has been separated in the higher and lower middle class, what has delivered the information from the poor people to the wealthy persons by natural social contacts, but when the abyss between incoming layers has been growing, that would cause problems to get information that the prizes or taxes are too high to ears of the persons, who make decisions. The problem in parliaments is that the people, who come from wealthy families are over-represented in those institutions.

Wealthy people have more money, and they would pay the membership fees for political parties more often than poor people, who need money for many other targets. This would cause the phenomenon, where politicians are receding from the poor people. If I would be a person, who lives in a one-room flat, I would feel uncomfortable to meet people, who live in own houses, because I would not have a normal social relationship with people, who have a different level of incoming.

The large middle class has also offered good field, where politicians could promise things, and that allowed the popularity, and if politician betrays the permissions, this thing can cause the there are no votes. And that's why politician must think carefully about permissions because the betraying those things can cause the dropping from parliament.

The problem is that there are less wealthy people than poor people, and the paradox is that wealthy people are funding the campaigns of politicians. But the votes come from poor people, and if a politician would just please wealthy people, that would cause the end of funding the campaign, but if the campaign pleases only the wealthy people, the means the loss of votes.

Loss of a normal social relationship, with normal discussions, would cause that those people would not have information, what is going on in the poor people neighborhood. And that causes fear mutually because every people have prejudice, and this is the thing, what trolls would benefit effectively. But when we are thinking about the loss of middle class people that causes economical problems, because of the role of middle class people has been acting as the financial reserve.

If the government needs more money, it would collect more taxes from the middle class people, and in the years, when there is not so big need for money the tax level can be decreased. But when we are talking about the thing like the federal reserve, there are many things, where those words are pointing. Of course, that means the central bank of the USA, but also that means the bumper, what gives limits how the economy can move, or it can mean the money what can use right away for some urgent building sites or other urgent targets.

One version of the reserve is marginal, where the level of taxes can move. When the level of taxes are planned the planner would calculate the minimum and maximum levels for taxes, and when the decisions of the level are made, the level of collecting the money would keep low, because that level can rise in the next year.

If we would think this way, the person, who determines the level of taxes operates in two year periods. In the first year, the level of taxes is determined, and on the second year, the determiner would check how those calculations connected to reality, and then adjust the levels of collecting taxes. This is one way to think about the role of middle-class people in the socio-economical field.

Can we always flex and please others? (Writing about ultimate capitalism)

Can we always flex and please others? (Writing about ultimate capitalism)

Today is time to talk and think about the thing, what is knows as the ultimate capitalism. We are seeing in history thousands of innovative directors, whose name has been raised the symbol of advantage like Henry Ford. That man created the assembly line, and that allowed to create the cars by using the method, where the worker should make only one work and movement. This man manufactured the first serial produced automobile, T-model Ford from the year 1908, which made him the ultimate genius.

And this same thing has raised that man as the symbol of ultimate capitalism. If the worker made things slowly in his factory, or otherways worked against the benefit of the company, that caused failing. The simple work made possible to replace the worker immediately, if somebody rebels against the rules of the company, what made the position of the owners very strong.

But the economic depression in the early 1930s and mass unemployment caused the position of the owners of the companies, what used the assembly line would be turned very strong. The thing that people needed money caused that many students were left their studies or needed part-time jobs, and the working in assembly lines was not needed a long education, and that allowed that there were lots of workers who wanted to come to work. And part-time jobs like cleaning were suitable jobs for students.

When we are looking at the working life, we must realize that employers have the right to tell people, what kind of workers they want to work in their companies. And if the employee doesn't please the boss, the leader of the team has right to kick that worker, who would not adapt in the ream away from the company. That thing is not the right of the leader of the team, that's the duty if someone would not want to follow the orders and instructions, what the company has been given. If the person is always against the boss, that means that the new employee must realize, that adapting to the way of work is always the way to keep the job and get higher positions in the companies.

When we are thinking about persons like language translators, they can be replaced by algorithms, what would not say a word against the leaders, and would make teams homogeneous. And if the corporation would train their workers self, the salaries would be kept low, and the thing is that that would make easier to create the worker team, where the member of the team is really easy to replace by another one. This is the idea of the conveyor belt, what Henry Ford invented, and that thing made that man the billionaire. But the when we are thinking about the conveyor belt in the ICT-business, we can understand that there has been made tests, where the programmer does only one thing in the program, and because the programming happens in the cloud environment, that means that those programmers can work at home.

Then the team leader would search the code, what is made and if the programmer cannot do the job, the passwords would be taken. This is one version of capitalism. Sometimes some people ask questions about why the big directors of the corporation have guts to kick people off their working place? The thing is that the big bosses have the educational requirements, and during that process, those people would be turned or correlate to think that they are deputies for the owners of the company.

The only thing, why the company exists is to bring the profit for their owners, and that's why those leaders and directors must think, that their mission is to make things roll. And here you might think, what happens during the correlation or education. Those directors would see the workers brotherhood, while they are making their summer job. And that would make the legends like Henry Ford and Lee Iacocca born.

The thing is that enterprise managers must think like hardcore capitalists are caused that something happens in their life. But when we are thinking about working life, we must realize that nobody is perfect. We cannot always please other people even we would want to think about that. This is the fact in life and every case, we must remember that there is no perfect job. We cannot every time flex, and that thing creates legends.

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

If you have read my texts before, you might read one of the texts, what probably look like this, but don't worry, these texts are meant for the reading. When people are creating new things, they should also see those things with critics, and tell people, how it can be used for wrong purposes. The things like tractors have transformed to combat vehicles, and the history is full of those cases, where the thing, what is made for good, has turned to the ultimate weapon. And do you know why military forces turn to use petroleum and oil in the vehicles?

The reason was easy, it made easier to control the most lethal force of the state. The warship couldn't take fuel from everywhere, they must take their oil from exactly the right harbor. And the oil was more effective fuel that some wood or coal. But when we are thinking the tanks and other vehicles the mechanized warfare was more effective than use horses, and the gasoline was an easy way to deny the rebellions.

The reason why military forces took aircraft in the use was simple. The pilot didn't need ground combat training at all, and the vehicle was a very effective, and cheap way to make an impression for generals, who wanted results. And that's why fighters became popular weapons. The reason why those persons would not be unpopular was that they were all officers. and that showed the men, that also officers took part in the war b giving personal investment in the action.

And the aircraft became more and more powerful. When we are thinking about the advantage of the military devices, the missiles were the next step. They could be sent to the target, and then the crew was free to fight like the regular soldiers. There was no defense against ballistic missiles until the first anti-ballistic missiles were created. And those systems based the nuclear warhead, what could damage the own electronics as well as destroy enemy missiles.

Robots are the most dangerous tools, what mankind has ever created. If they are used for bad purposes, they would not excuse the orders. So if the operator will order them to torture, they would not say a thing against that order. 

Modern versions are basing the combination of microwave and kinetic energy and they should destroy the incoming warheads. Also, the target can be covered by using plasma-layer, which should deny the radar-echoes from the area, or the systems, what are making the more powerful echoes, and the idea is to make the warheads to detonate too early, or jam the detonation system by using the EMP-pulse.

The advantage of military systems is causing the thing, where drones and killer robots are coming to the battlefield. Those systems are facing the resistance, but same way nuclear weapons and bombers, as well chemical weapons have faced resistance when they were taken in use.

The drones are remote-controlled systems, and the operators would not need military training at all, and the military police can take the operator in the custody if something bad is happening. If the operator would start to make things, what that person should not do, the commander can just remove that operator from the command console.

This is why the superpowers are creating more and more effective robots, and another argument is that the commander of the robot army doesn't need to care losses. But the things against those systems is that they could be the ultimate tool in the hands of dictators. The robot doesn't ever excuse its orders, and this is the danger of those systems.

I always have said that robots don't torture, but if the commander orders them to do those things, they don't excuse. And robots are allowing to go to war, what nobody even knows. They can make even mass murders, and then they can be destroyed. That makes those devices the most dangerous thing, what mankind has ever created.

30 years from Tiananmen

30 years from Tiananmen


1. What we have learned about this case?

When China transformed its economic system to the "socialistic marketing system", that means that the Chinese government has raised the economic level of the people in China, and that helps to keep society peaceful. And the large population of China would make it a good marketing area, would that cause a very embarrassing situation also in the western nations. If western nations would irritate the Chinese government, that would not allow making products in China.

The silence would tell that somebody shames that thing, what is embarrassing in the eyes of other nations because if the people don't stop to talk about Tiananmen, must western leaders follow the people, and transfer the production to some other countries.  The big economic value of China makes human rights and political system with Tienanmen case somehow difficult topic to talk. Because if the western governments would not respect China, they will not market their products to that area.

2. Violence was unnecessary

And otherwise, if the western nations would make trade contracts with China, that is interpreted as the acceptance of the political and human rights situation in China. But as we know, the good and clean facade helps people to forget things, what happened 30 years ago. There is a one really interesting thing about this case and its the violation against protesters were not necessary.

The weather in the summer in Beijing is really hot, and the protesters would not able to stay in their position in the extreme heat. The thing is that the reputation of the military in China gone, and also in other countries has been talking, that the military forces can be used against own people, and that was removed the shield of those organizations, that they could be used only against foreign enemies. Tiananmen was the case, what made Eastern block nations afraid their governments and caused the situation, where people forced to begin the uprising against the communist nations.

3. China would want the same position, what the Soviet Union had in the cold war era. 

Without hygienic abilities, those people would leave from the place, and after that, the police could arrest them without any attention of the foreign countries. The thing, what makes this case a little bit embarrassing is that it would disturb the trade between China and western nations. China needs co-operation with western companies, that it can get new technology for its military systems.

But there are more problems also in the internal politics of that country. When China released markets it dropped the bottom off from the ideological excuse for the one-party policy, what was argued with communism and Marxism-Leninism. But when the markets opened, the thing what remained was the dictatorship.

4. International law is not controlling the internal affairs of nations. 

The thing is that growing economic situation in China guarantees that the society in that country is peaceful and that releases resources for foreign affairs, like strengthen and modernization of the military forces, what are the really good equipment for strengthening own position in the international field of politics.

The problems with the relationship with western nations are that the rulers of China use those relationships as an argument that the western nations support the one party policy of China. And this kind of things is mentioned as the internal affairs of China. In international law is not mentioned about, what kind of political system is allowed in nations.

5. The foreign technology benefits the military forces of China

That means China has juridical right to be a one-party nation, and there is nothing, what would deny that thing. Tiananmen case is a purely internal affair of China, and that's why there is nothing wrong in that case. So the police acts are internal affairs, and if China would not justify those happenings, that is the own business of that nation.

One of the things is that China has grown the export and also opened new military bases including overseas bases tells that it really want to reach the position, what the Soviet Union had in the past world. And this would make it a stronger actor in the international arena, what people have ever thought. This is a very problematic thing in international politics because every nation has the legal right to defend itself and forward own benefit.