What is the problem with the Theory of General Relativity?

Is Einstein's Theory of General Relativity right or wrong? We have proven that Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity is right. But why somebody is suspicious in the case of the Theory of General Relativity? The Theory of General Relativity is made for fixing errors in the Theory of Special Relativity that doesn't mention the behavior of the objects in the curving spacetime. Those errors were noticed when observations of the trajectory of the planet Mercury have not to match with theoretical calculations. 

Albert Einstein introduced his Theory of Special Relativity in 1905. And the Theory of General Relativity was introduced in 1916 during WWI. The First World War was the worst moment to publish scientific papers. And after the war, the winners were jealous of those kinds of things. So we must remember that Einstein made his work in Germany. And the war covered that work that is called the most beautiful formula in the world E=Mc^2:

E=Mc^2 is

E=Energy

M= Mass

c= Speed of light

This was the short history of those very interesting theories that are the cornerstone of the modern way to think about the cosmos. 

But the thing that makes the Theory of General Relativity so interesting is that is not working with quantum mechanics or quantum physics. The quantum theory is compatible with the Theory of Special Relativity but not with the Theory of General Relativity. And that causes thoughts is there the missing piece between the quantum theory and the Theory of General Relativity. 

The problem with both theories of relativity and quantum theory is that they are meant for different scales. The theory of Special Relativity is handling the cases of the straight universe. And Theory of General Relativity handles the things that happen in the curving spacetime. So what makes those theories problematic? Maybe we are thinking the wrong way. Maybe there is an error that Einstein didn't notice. The thing is that we always try to make the models. 

Or is that error on the side of quantum theory. Does that theory notice the oscillation and vibration of the quantum particles? And if we are thinking that the quantum particles are not ever stable we might think that the quantum theory just doesn't notice that the place of the particles is changing all the time. And do those theories notice the wave-particle duality? 

That means the particles in the universe are not smooth. They are wrinkled or full of the protuberance. But when we are thinking about curving spacetime we must ask is there a limit for curving that is necessary when the Theory of General Relativity can connect with quantum theory. Or is there something missing between quantum theory and the Theory of General relativity? 

And in that case, we are using the most extreme cases in the universe. The fact is that spacetime is curving around all gravitational objects. But is it curving enough that the Theory of General Relativity can work with those reactions? If we are thinking that the gravitation causes the pothole in the spacetime, how deep that pothole should be that the Theory of General Relativity is turning dominant? 

Black holes are the most extreme objects in the universe. Even the light cannot escape from those gravitation centers. So is it possible that the gravitation of any other object in the universe is so weak, that the pothole around the object is not deep enough that the Theory of General Relativity is not fitting in the case? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Even Einstein was human

Even Einstein was human

The problem with Albert Einstein is that he and his ideas are so fantastic and the same time so massive, that we cannot question them. So when we are thinking about Einstein's theories, what was fundamental in his lifetime, or when he introduced them to the world, we must remember two things. 

Einstein didn't have supercomputers, and when he introduced the Theory of Special Relativity in 1905 and Theory of Common Relativity in 1915, those theories became two of the most awesome and well-known formulas. But we don't know why Einstein created those formulas? Who ordered that man make those theories, and what was hypothesis when that job was given to Einstein? 

So there is another thing, what we are many times forget to ask, and that thing is "what were the values, what Einstein used? Did he use the theoretical speed of light, what is 300 000 m/s or did he used the value, what was metered by Michelson, and what is approximately 299 792 458 m/s? The thing is that there are differences with those numbers. And when we are thinking about the time, what Einstein used for creating those formulas, he made excellent work. But he 'forgot that the space is never straight. 

When we are calculating things by using extremely long decimal numbers, we can say that Einstein's formulas are not matching with reality. That means that those famous formulas are working in the common and enough large scale, but when we are going to the very small areas there are mistakes. So Einstein's theories work with entirety, but unique details are problems. This is the problem with physics and every other formula in the world. 

Those formulas are made in the time, there were no supercomputers and float number algorithms, which can handle extremely long decimal numbers, which gives enough accuracy for calculations. Sometimes people have asked, what if the value for the speed of light, what was reported by Michelson was wrong? In that case, every single laser ranger in the world would show the wrong numbers. 

This would open the route for very interesting philosophical discussions about things, what might be wrong, but commonly thought to be right. And if we would someday meter the different value for the speed of light, what would we do? Would we replace the speed of light and other meterings, where were used the laser meter again? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov98y_DCvRY

Einstein and quantum theory

Einstein and quantum theory

Many people are making mistakes in the names of Einstein's theories, and that kind of thing is common in the scientific texts, and many times the things like speed of light are marked accidentally as the km/s. And even the best of best are making mistakes when they are tired.

But when we are facing the thing that the speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s that thing is causing the thought that photon is moving too slowly. And that should mean it has the mass because the speed of light is calculated to 300 000 m/s, and the thing that causes this thing would be the radiation or so-called chamfer photon, background radiation or dark material, would slow the photon. 

And the question is what number we use, calculated or measured? If the calculated speed of the light a measured speed has a difference, that means that the photon would not travel in the space, where is always some kind of energy, which makes the empty universe impossible. 

Did Einstein make a mistake when he calculated the trajectory of the planet Mercury? The thing is that this mistake might be caused a thing called accuracy in measurements that have caused one of the most interesting dilemmas in history. Was Einstein think that the speed of light was 300 000 m/s, and the real speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s? That thing was measured, by Albert A Michelson and Edward W. Morley during the so-called Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887. But did Einstein knew that thing?

E=Mc² is the most well known mathematical formula in the world, and that thing is sometimes mentioned as the Theory of Common Relativity. But in some sources, the same formula is called the theory of Special Relativity. So witch one is right? The letters mean E= energy, M= Mass, and c=the speed of light. So what is the name of that theory? The thing is that the formula itself doesn't belong to any of Einstein's theories, and that is the consequence of the Theory of Special Relativity. 

In the theoretical world is one thing that remains stable, and that is the thing, that when somebody is in the mode, everything must combinate with that. When we are looking exactly and with very big accuracy the Theory of Common Relativity was created in 1916, after the first relativity theory of Albert Einstein. 

The theory of Special relativity has taken ten years of the life of Einstein, and he published it in 1905.  that he fixed a couple of errors, what has been found in that theory, and those errors belonged to very limited areas in the Universe. That meant that the theoretical calculations between the speed and time of the trajectory of planet Mercury didn't match the measurements that scientists have made. 

Theory of Special Relativity E=Mc² is the energy formula, what is used as the formula, what is used to calculate the power of nuclear explosives. So that formula is not very suitable for calculating speeds and other things. And would that mean that Einstein created another formula, what is also called the name of Theory of General relativity? There is no answer to that question. 

That means that this thing was really small, and that thing proved the pliability of the universe and time have been proven, and by finding the errors of the extremely sharp clocks, what is used for the time measurements in GPS-locations have been running faster than clocks on the ground. And that thing caused the effect of slowing the time has been proven. The last thing is that the cases when the atom clocks have been in the aircraft, what have been fly around the world, there have been differences between those clocks, what were in those planes, and the clocks that were left in stable locations. 

So thins thing caused the slowing the time was true. But when we are thinking about the things of classical physics and Einstein theories and quantum theories, we must realize, that there is a very interesting thing in those theories, and that is that everything should be in harmony with the newest theory. 

If we are thinking that some of those theories are knocked out, that thing should argument by using the greater accuracy, than just saying that the "theory is out of use". Here I must say that things like G-force and escaping velocity are still the same things as in Newton's time, and those things are not things what would turn the normal physics lesson to the lesson of quantum mechanics, what would be an interesting way to begin lessons in the elementary school. 

But when we are saying that Einstein attacked against quantum theory, we should also ask when and how this attack happened? The Einsteins famous formula E=Mc² (Energy is mass counted speed of light power two) made him famous. That is known as the Theory of Special Relativity, but it's the consequence of that theory, and this formula is one of the key elements, while people are calculating the energy levels of nuclear explosions. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_A._Michelson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_W._Morley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment

https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

Theories about virtual photons and how they are connected to Poincaré conjecture or calculate the form of any geometrical form in the universe.

Theories about virtual photons and how they are connected to Poincaré conjecture or calculate the form of any geometrical form in the universe.

Prolog:  How to model 3D image on the 2D layer without hologram system?

Mathematician Grigory Perelman created one answer to that calculation, what is known as Poincaré conjecture. And he won the price what has been offered to a person, who created that kind of solution, or how those things are written.

That thing was one of the so-called Millenium problems, which means that the Clay mathematical institute has paid the price for a person, who has solved one of those problems by the acceptable way.

Modeling 3D model in paper is impossible. So there is needed the mathematical formula for creating that thing. 

The idea of the Poincaré conjecture is to calculate every geometrical form in the universe. The reason why those forms must be calculated is that the 3D forms are impossible to make in the 2D layer.

The answer would be that creating the coordinate system. what has billions of axels in the 3D universe is possible to demonstrate every geometrical form in the entire universe. The idea os to use imaginal numbers, which has billions of imaginal parts. And the idea is the same as calculating the points in the regular coordinate system. In a regular system, a point has two values  (4,2) which means that the X-axel the point of the point is 4, and the point in Y-axel is 2.

But we could also connect Z-axel to that coordinate system, and that means that we could determine the point, what is above the paper. The mark (4,2,3) means that the third number is 3 units above the paper, which means that drawing that thing is impossible. Then we can increase the number of those axels, which is rising above the paper or to the 3D universe as many as we want.

And in those cases, the marking (4,2,3,6) means that the last point is in the axel, what is in a certain angle to the axel, which raises straight above the paper. And there is no limit for the number of those axels. This is one version of the system, which can calculate 3D images, which is impossible to draw without holographic systems.

Richard Feynman and his virtual photon

When photon makes many curves, it would travel a longer journey than photon what makes fewer curves. This is a very interesting way to think about Feynman theory, and the thing is that when photon would make many curves it would travel a longer distance than photon what goes straight trajectory.

That means that two photons are traveling in the space with the same speed but a different journey, and that means that other photon would come to the detector before another photon even if they are launched from the same place, same time, but they have different frequencies and in this case, the photon what arrives in sensor before other would not break the cosmic speed limit, because another photon would travel longer journey. But if we think this idea more careful, there is an idea, what this thing has brought in the head of some other quantum physics.

The thing is that if we would a little bit transform that theory that would allow, that electron could travel some journey in a shorter time than a photon if photon makes enough curves on the journey, and that means that if the electron would travel straight and very high speed, that particle could travel between two points in shorter time than photon, but in that case the photon would travel longer journey, and the speed of the photon would be faster than the speed of electron.

This is the thing in quantum theories. The thing is that the quantum theories born when Albert Einstein didn't get a match with the theoretical calculations of his first or so-called special relativity theory and the practical observations. So he created the "Common theory of relativity", and he created the first theory, what is connected to quantum theory.

The quantum theory, what was created by Niels Bohr and Richard Feynman using the base of that thing the Einstein's  "Common theory of relativity" what allows the changes of the speed of the light. The quantum theories are meant for fixing or solving the minimal errors of the calculations of classical physics. 

And the idea is that the quantum theories are explaining the minimum errors, what is visible in calculations, what are made by using the very big accuracy and long decimal numbers. That means that when we are thinking about the theory of the fourth dimension, that theory is conducted from the minimal errors in the calculations, of mathematical formulas, what was handled geometrical forms in the 3D universe.

That kind of calculations are made by using the imaginal numbers, or the numbers, what have two values. The imaginal number usually means two numbers one is determining the place of the X-axel in a coordinate system, and another is determining the number's place in Y-axel.  But there could be other imaginal parts in those numbers. and if there is a 3D coordinate system in use, there could have a three-part imaginal number. That thing allows calculating the forms, what are impossible to draw on paper. And that thing allows demonstrating any geometrical form in the universe.

There are two wormhole theories

Image I

There are two wormhole theories

1. The virtual wormhole bases Einstein's Theory of Relativity, that gravity or very high speed slows the time. That means that the time is a relative thing, what can be stopped by traveling by the speed of light. 

In the first version, the crossing the speed of light is only virtual. The idea is that the black hole would be used as the gravity sling, which would increase the speed of the particle near the speed of the light.

And the slowing the time in the particle would cause the virtual effect when the hypothetical astronaut would see that the travel between stars would feel to take only minutes. The time to start, what is at the 150 light-years away from the Earth would take 150 years.

The "virtual wormhole" bases Einstein's theory about that the time would slow in the gravity field or when the particle moves with very high speed. And in this theory, the energy is slowing time, because gravity is one version of energy, like kinetic or movement energy is?

The wormhole would be the effect when the particle is traveling in the space by the speed of 99,99% of the speed of light. And that causes the effect, that the time goes very slow or time stops inside the particle.

In this theory, the lightspeed would not be crossed, and the travel to the star what is as an example the 150 light-years away from the beginning point of the wormhole would take 150 years, as I wrote before, but inside the particle, the travel would feel to take the only couple of minutes. In this version, the lightspeed would be the cosmic speed limit and the wormhole would be only the virtual effect, what is possible only in the speed, what is near the speed of light.

2. The craft would jump to the fourth dimension

That theory bases the idea that the cosmic speed limit is the level of energy, where the three-dimensional universe can keep the particle inside it. And if the particle would face or cross that speed, the kinetic energy transforms it as the black hole, and the particle drops out of our universe.

We don't know is the travel to the fourth dimension possible, and if the particle would transform into a black hole, there is a possibility that it would explode immediately. That means that the black hole would be filled, and it would be destroyed, because of Hawking's radiation, what escapes from the black hole would cause that the black hole would vanish or be streamed to quark steam. But if it would jump to the fourth dimension, it would open interesting visions.

Why some people are talking about the fifth dimension? And is the fourth dimension only space, what is behind the event horizons of black holes?  Or is it some kind of energy level?

Somewhere is claimed, that the wormhole itself would be the fourth dimension. And the fifth dimension is the space, where the wormhole takes the particle. Some cosmologists are thinking that the fourth dimension is the space inside the event horizon.

And if the wormhole could take particles only to the gravitational center of the network of black holes, the fourth dimension would be the supermassive black hole in the center of Galaxy. So the fifth dimension is in this theory route back from those particles

Or some other theories are claiming, that the "fourth dimension" is the energy level, and when the energy would be pumped away, the particle could return from that space to our universe. And the wormhole, what brings particles back from the fourth dimension is the fifth dimension.

Dropping out of universe means the particle would travel to space, which is known as the "fourth dimension". That thing is an interesting space, because of the particle would be out of our universe. But how we can prove that thing? The problem with that thing is that we don't know, how to return the particle from the fourth or fifth dimension.

Image:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/cena/cena.jpg

Theory of relativity or theory of relative

Theory of relativity or theory of relative

1. Every theory is somehow inaccurate

I know that I made a mistake in the name of Einstein's theory, but that thing is called academic inaccuracy.  When we are thinking about things like accuracy, we would face the thing that all theories are somehow inaccurate, because they are meant for common use. There are many things and places, where theories would not work.

And there is always a difference between the theoretical and real world. In theory, we can model everything in the memory of the computer. But then we are facing the thing, that there is no object, what fits that model. When we are thinking the cases of supermassive black holes, we are facing the cold reality, that those supermassive black holes are maybe not the typical black holes.

2. A typical black hole might not locate in the middle of the galaxies

Modern astronomers think that in the center of every single galaxy is the supermassive black hole. And that would be very interesting because that means that those black holes are easy to find. Galaxies are very visible objects and that means that this makes those black holes easy to find. But actually, we cannot see the black holes themselves. We can see the cosmic structures around them, and then we must think about this case by using some other method or road to find out one very interesting thing about black holes.

The typical black hole is not probably in the middle of the galaxies.  A typical black hole might not galaxy around it, and that makes them quite difficult to find. But those black holes are sending X-rays, and that makes them easy to find if the observer would have X-ray telescopes. The high energy reactions around black holes are uncovering those objects, what looks like stoned.

Theory of relativity and space travel

Theory of relativity and space travel

The fish-example 

Einstein's theory of relativity is one of the most interesting and remarkable theories in history. And there is one connection to the example of the flowing river. That thing is that if the fish would swim against the flowing water with very big power, would it face the flowing water with faster speed than in the places, where water is standing still.

So if the speed of the fish is 20 kilometers per hour and the water would flow against it with the speed of 20 kilometers per hour, the impact speed with water is 40 kilometers in an hour. The example is taken from the examine, where the impact speed of the cars is asked when they are hitting against together while both of them have a speed of 40 kilometers per hour. That means that the impact speed is the addition, where the speeds of both particles are sum together.

Ability to travel faster than the light

When we are thinking about the first paragraph, we might ask, what would that thing do with the space traveling and the interstellar spaceflights. In fact, there is a possibility to create the spacecraft, what would cross the cosmic speed limit, what is called as the speed of the light. In this system would the ions pull towards the spacecraft with very powerful magnets.

Those magnets would create the impact area, where the impact speed of the spacecraft would be higher than the speed of light. And maybe that kind of things could make the hyperdrive possible, and in the future, we could use this version of the hyperdrive in the distant future for traveling between the stars.

In this case, the rockets what use antimatter as fuel would accelerate the spacecraft to the speed, what is about the 50-90% of the speed of the light. And then the system can pull the ions to the accelerator channel, what would accelerate them to the speed of light. If the particle accelerator would suck the particles in the accelerator channel by the speed of the light, or something like 80% of the speed of the light, would the impact speed of the spacecraft and the particles about 1,5 times of the speed of the light.

In that point, the spacecraft would fly faster than the speed of light. The reason for that is that slowing the mass cannot slow by unlimited speed and the thing causes that the spacecraft would travel faster than light in the short moment because the speed of the light is slower in water than in the air. And then when the electron is hitting to the water, would that cause the thing, what is called the "border layer crossing".

This phenomenon is visible in the neutrino detectors, where the electron is hitting in the water pool, and that thing causes the blue light shock-wave. This means that the speed of the electron crosses the speed of the light in a very short time period. And when the electron is slowing, it must release its energy, what is seen as the blue light shock wave.

Could this be the hyperdrive?

The idea is that the particle pulling is turned off, and maybe the spacecraft would jump forward with the speed, what is higher than the speed of the light.  The idea is similar when the fish what would travel upwards to the river in 20 kilometers per hour because it must fight against the flowing water, and then the fish would face the stream pool, and suddenly it's speed would increase to very high.

In this hypothetical case, the starship would pull the particles against it, and the impact speed with those particles would be something like 1,5 times the speed of the light, and then the particle accelerator would shut down. By using this technology, the hypothetical spacecraft would jump forward like rabbit of the fish in the example. So that can be one version of the hyperdrive.