Skip to main content

What is the problem with the Theory of General Relativity?





Is Einstein's Theory of General Relativity right or wrong? We have proven that Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity is right. But why somebody is suspicious in the case of the Theory of General Relativity? The Theory of General Relativity is made for fixing errors in the Theory of Special Relativity that doesn't mention the behavior of the objects in the curving spacetime. Those errors were noticed when observations of the trajectory of the planet Mercury have not to match with theoretical calculations. 

Albert Einstein introduced his Theory of Special Relativity in 1905. And the Theory of General Relativity was introduced in 1916 during WWI. The First World War was the worst moment to publish scientific papers. And after the war, the winners were jealous of those kinds of things. So we must remember that Einstein made his work in Germany. And the war covered that work that is called the most beautiful formula in the world E=Mc^2:


E=Mc^2 is

E=Energy

M= Mass

c= Speed of light


This was the short history of those very interesting theories that are the cornerstone of the modern way to think about the cosmos. 

But the thing that makes the Theory of General Relativity so interesting is that is not working with quantum mechanics or quantum physics. The quantum theory is compatible with the Theory of Special Relativity but not with the Theory of General Relativity. And that causes thoughts is there the missing piece between the quantum theory and the Theory of General Relativity. 

The problem with both theories of relativity and quantum theory is that they are meant for different scales. The theory of Special Relativity is handling the cases of the straight universe. And Theory of General Relativity handles the things that happen in the curving spacetime. So what makes those theories problematic? Maybe we are thinking the wrong way. Maybe there is an error that Einstein didn't notice. The thing is that we always try to make the models. 

Or is that error on the side of quantum theory. Does that theory notice the oscillation and vibration of the quantum particles? And if we are thinking that the quantum particles are not ever stable we might think that the quantum theory just doesn't notice that the place of the particles is changing all the time. And do those theories notice the wave-particle duality? 

That means the particles in the universe are not smooth. They are wrinkled or full of the protuberance. But when we are thinking about curving spacetime we must ask is there a limit for curving that is necessary when the Theory of General Relativity can connect with quantum theory. Or is there something missing between quantum theory and the Theory of General relativity? 

And in that case, we are using the most extreme cases in the universe. The fact is that spacetime is curving around all gravitational objects. But is it curving enough that the Theory of General Relativity can work with those reactions? If we are thinking that the gravitation causes the pothole in the spacetime, how deep that pothole should be that the Theory of General Relativity is turning dominant? 

Black holes are the most extreme objects in the universe. Even the light cannot escape from those gravitation centers. So is it possible that the gravitation of any other object in the universe is so weak, that the pothole around the object is not deep enough that the Theory of General Relativity is not fitting in the case? 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...
Post a Comment
Read more