Skip to main content

Politicians say that we made 20 times more for the environment than ever before. But is it enough?


But is it enough? When we remember the history of climate chancing. We have to know that thing. And nothing is done. Now we are facing the fact that the rains are making the cities flooding. And the question is that why we should pay for energy more than ever before? The answer is that we should make investments in green technology.

Or we must make investments in new flood dams. So we must take money for both investment targets. Or we might move away from the coastline and build a new city. The fact is that even if we will not do anything for renewing our energy source we should build protection against storms. 

And otherwise, even if we can stop the carbon dioxide emission immediately the greenhouse effect continues. Removing carbon from the atmosphere takes time. A warming atmosphere increases the clouds. That means that the visible radiation of the Sun will decrease at sea level.

 But the infrared radiation will cause the rise of the temperature in the atmosphere. And that means the temperature rises but the level of light is turning low. 

Why we must be worried about that thing? When people are saying that energy costs too much. They should realize that floods and storms are turning more common than ever before. 

The sewer systems in the cities cannot handle all flood water. And the problems with the new rains are that they are very strong. The warm weather along with the rain is the thing that is causing the strong microbe action. And in dark weather trees are not producing oxygen. They are producing carbon dioxide because they cannot make photosynthesis. 

The fact is that 99,9 percent of scientists are confessed about climate change and that most of it are caused by humans. Almost 100% of the scientists believe that human activity is caused at least most of global warming. 

But the question is why didn't react to that thing earlier? There are still people who have a "critical attitude" for those reports. But have those people ever looked outside? The fact is that climate change and global temperature rise can cause danger for the entire human civilization. 

The problem is that when the global temperature rises the dark and warm times at the polar and subpolar areas are turning longer. That is the thing that causes methane emissions to the atmosphere when the bacteria is starting to melt dead vegetables. 

Also, the bodies that are buried in the icy ground can deliver the micro-organisms to the water when they are melting. But maybe these kinds of things are some kind of panic. 


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10104511/Climate-change-99-9-studies-agree-global-warming-mainly-caused-humans.html


https://scitechdaily.com/the-changing-climates-snowball-effect-can-new-technologies-help/


https://scitechdaily.com/consensus-revisited-do-scientists-still-believe-in-anthropogenic-human-caused-climate-change/

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...
Post a Comment
Read more