93 years old KZ-camp guard would get to court

93 years old KZ-camp guard would get to court

This would be one of the last prosecutions against the prison guards of the Nazi-Germany. Those prosecutions are very important because their mission is to show that murders ever get old. And if the murderer would catch after a long time, those cases would send to the court. 

The operators who made those crimes were always young in the sides of Stalin and Hitler, because the execution was the thing, what made those people shame about their actions. Also, it was an effective method to tie the person in the system and make sure about the loyalty of that young security police officer.

If the person said "no" that meant death, was the thing, what those people learned to say. But was it true? Whoever knows. And for the first time, the person claimed for self, to be forced in that case. But sometimes those things were only the psychological tricks that were offered to those people. The idea was that the first execution was difficult, and the person would be escorted across the line and then the rest was easier.

Murders ever get old, and this is the principle in the constitutional states. Even if the suspect is old and weak, that would not justify those actions. And even if somebody else makes that kind of crime, that doesn't mean that they are acceptable. So the message of those prosecutions is that if you make crimes, you will be punished even if the orders came from superior officers.

The law's mission is to make strict and clear orders for society. And that means everybody must follow the law. That means that the prosecutions can be raised even if the person is in the hospice, because the law says, that the old age is not released the person from the criminal prosecution process. And this is the reason, why also old cases are prosecuted.

When we are thinking about the mission of the Court of Law, that means the mission of the court system is to punish people, who break the law. The punishments are made for a warning for people, who are planning some criminal actions. The mission of those prosecutions is to make fear in the heart of people, who have made serious crimes. That means those legal actions against the war criminals are important.

War criminals are living in the middle of us. The Yogoslavia war in the 1990s and things like the Gulf War have opened the eyes of the people, that there are monsters also in a so-called good side. Also in Libya, where Muammar Gaddafi was kicked off from power has many people, who were acted in the side of the Gaddafi and his secret police, and tortured the prisoners.

Sometimes I have thought that could it be possible that some of those persons would be acting in the side of the allied force? When we are thinking about those people who would be very normal looking, could make the worst things, what mankind can imagine. And those people are perfect operators in the dark operations because they can shoot during the arresting.

The idea is that those operators would be acting against Islamists under medical supervision. In this model, the bone marrow of the person would be changed, and if the person can be kept under the control by using the immune medicals. Even if the USA itself would not use that kind of staff, the operators like Saudi-Arabia are using those methods.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11024299

About the murder investigations and use of DNA for tracking criminals

About the murder investigations and use of DNA for tracking criminals

DNA is a sensitive topic for hunting criminals. If somebody would deliver DNA for tracking the family tree, that thing could help to track criminals, who are made serious crimes, and in this kind of cases, we must remember that if the person is a serial killer, the use of DNA could track the person, who might want to make another murder. But the thing is that the law is always the thing, what is controlling this kind of things.

Do we want to give a DNA sample, what might help us to track the murderer, even that person is a member of our own family? Or do we want that every person in our country will be tested for tracking persons, who might be dangerous for society? Those things are really difficult things because they are telling also things, what we don't want to find out.

The DNA sample tells how intelligent we are, and that is a very good tool for hunting people, who have cheat in the entrance examinations. The DNA has been the ultimate tool for tracking violent people from the killers to rioters, because the stones, what are used against police can be used for sources where is the investigators could take the DNA samples.

Below this text is the link to the article of the Bodom murder case, where is a picture of the homicide investigations. In modern times the crime-scene investigators would not smoke cigarettes in that area, and that picture would not even be published. In modern times the investigators would dress like astronauts and the purpose of the gas masks or the respirator, what uses air bottles is to deny the pollution of the DNA in that object.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10946750

Taking the DNA samples is a thing, what needs very big accuracy and that means that this kind of investigation needs very good equipment. Only one drop of the saliva what comes from the sample taker would pollute the sample. And in some cases, there is a problem that if the person who works as the crime scene investigator would make crime, the sneeze of the investigator would cause that person DNA would transfer to the wrong place. And that kind of things is really bad for investigations.

The DNA sample doesn't tell is some person made the crime or not. That sample tells only if the person has touched some objects, or been in some room. When we are analyzing the DNA we could find the things, what the criminal doesn't want the police or anybody else to know. The sequences of the DNA are telling are we carrying some genetic illness like Schizophrenia or do the person have a genetic disorder, what causes sociopathy. But it also tells does the person some kind of allergy and what is the skin color or color of the eyes and hair. That thing makes DNA the ultimate tool for criminal investigators.

When despotism turns against the ruler

When despotism turns against the ruler 

When we are thinking about the Emperor of Russia, we must say that the final end for that way to rule made the emperor himself. The thing is that the despotism, what made the emperor so powerful caused that he was under the threat, what other people ever thought. That threat was that people afraid the emperor, and the despotic way to rule caused that the agitators claimed, that emperor killed people if that person didn't like food, what was served in the front of that man.

And that kind of things caused the situation, that the despotism turned against the user of power. The situation was similar to what Alexander the Great faced during his campaigns. The problem with that man was heavy drinking, and during those parties, Alexander took sometimes a sword and started an attack against other people, who were with him, and the worst thing is that he lost his memory during the parties.

Did somebody just murder Alexander the Great by using Krav-Maga?

The bodyguards didn't do anything to stop that man when he sways with swords and pikes. That caused the thing, that those people could claim everything to Alexander, who lost his memory. One of the things about this case is that Alexander was becoming a terrifying person, who was afraid by other people, who didn't dare to tell a thing to that man, who became monster while he was drunk.

And because he lost his memory, the assassins could just claim, that he made something to the person, who laid the sword in the chest. Maybe his bodyguards killed that man and just told the story about the poisoning. When we are thinking about the way, how Alexander behaves and how violent he was, the real reason for death might be some kind of strikes to head or stomach.

In that case, even the step on the stomach would cause the rip of the stomach or speel, and that might cause similar symptoms with the poison. And that might happen also by accident, when somebody, who was drunk just step over the stomach of Alexander the Great, who was maybe off. or those people might play the game, who has the strongest stomach muscles, and that will cause death if Alexander overestimated his strength, or did he just slip and hit his head? The symptoms would fit also to the concussion or internal blood leak in the brains.

But if Alexander the Great was murdered, the killer must be sure that there is no blood or signs of external violence. Maybe the killer used the Krav-Maga-style self-defense or combat skills, and in that case, the report, what was made because of the death of Alexander might be faked. I don't know about the way, how the death of the emperor was told to the people at that time and was the medical reports public. But the case of Alexander the great the news for death of that man would not enter his homeland immediately.

There could be taken years when the ordinary people would even know about the death of the leader, who took his army to India. And at last, we might think one question: "How good were the autopsies in that time"? Or if Alexander was dead because the bodyguard used deadly force, would that man just tell that to others, because it might cause death, because of the death penalty was given by murder of the King.