Computer, what rules human

Computer, what rules human

The question, what if human works under the rule of a computer seem absurd, but then we must realize that there are many support and safe systems, what mission is to advise the leaders. And the question is when the advice would turn to order? If the leader always follows advisors, that thing means that the leader gives the decision to other people or systems. And those things are problematic. The official leader has always the responsibility of decisions. But if some eminence would act in coulisses, that means that decision-makers can avoid the responsibility of decisions.

In some old movies and books has been introduced the idea that human or some humans would be working as servants for computers or artificial intelligence. In that case, we must remember something, which is very common in everyday life. When the director is hired in the firm, or some president would take the place as the leader for the nation, there are lots of advisors for that person.

And those advisors are, or they should be the top specialists, what can be found from the nation. But the role of those people is that they must give advice. But what the leader doesn't listen, and then something would get wrong, but there is also the opposite case, what if the leader would always follow the instructions of the advisor?

That would mean that the advisor would be a real leader in the organization, but in that case, the advisor would work as eminence, that person would make a decision, but others would take responsibility for those decisions. What happens if some leader follows always the advises, what artificial intelligence would give? The thing in artificial intelligence is the reason, why it is made, is that its mission is to collect every kind of data, and support the analysis, what would cost billions.

So what if artificial intelligence would suggest, that the director must kick off a thousand workers, and move the entire corporation to the Far East? The argument for that thing would be that the Far East would bring value for the corporation, and there are lots of customers. And the director just follows that advice. The thing is that artificial intelligence is made for supporting the company and help it, owners, to make money.

What if the director would not follow the instructions, and work against the benefit of the corporation? Here we must realize that the benefit of the big owners of the company could be different than the benefit for workers. And that thing makes the role of artificial intelligence problematic. The role of the director is to be a deputy of the stockholders, and that means that this man must only make a profit for the company.

The artificial intelligence has a mission to control that the will of owners will happen, and when we are thinking about the case, where artificial intelligence turns human to henchmen, the thing, what that system must do is to use subliminal commands, what is simultaneously repeating the words "obey things, what you see on screen" and that message can flash in every screen, what is owned by the corporation. Then artificial intelligence would control every person in the corporation, and make them follow orders. These kinds of things are really interesting, and they open a new type of threat in front of the eyes of the people.

What went wrong in Venezuela?

What went wrong in Venezuela?

Venezuela is a school example, how the country, what could be like South-American Qatar just collapsed? The major point in that question is that this country has very big oil resources, and that thing might be accepted and guaranteed product for export trade and that product should bring money in the cash of the state.

But then the people started to think about environmental things, and one of the worst sources of pollution is oil and another kind of fossil fuel. This kind of things is causing a decrease in demand for oil. But there is another thing, what causes a collapse of the nation, and that is corruption.

One visible sign of corruption is counterfeiting history. And another is that the really popular person would just buy votes by promising freedom from taxes. There is nothing wrong if the person is popular, but if the popularity is got by attacking against minorities or making laws, what is limiting the private life of people by the unnecessary way, that thing causes fear.

People start to afraid the leaders, who are always asking people to streets or otherwise ask the military to crush protests if they are not suitable for those people. And also the violence of "political supporters" of that kind of populists, what are targeted to political resistants or opposition causes fear, and thoughts like "who is next, who will get the drive"?

The thing is that there are always rumors that there is done very bad things, even if the violence would be pushing and yelling. Somebody start always tell legends about killings and disappearings, what might be connected to regular criminals. The cocaine is grown in every jungle in South-America and sometimes has been claimed, that some politicians are hired the gunmen of those drug gangs for eliminating their political competitors.

Sometimes is claimed that the Colombian drug cartels have channeled some kind of money to the political election campaigns of the politicians who want to disband the cooperation with DEA and the other authorities of the United States, but those cartels might do those donations for causing the loss of the reputation for some politicians. And the question is, did those people, who handled those campaigns knew, that the claimed donations came from drug mafia?

Those gangsters are done that kind of donations in Colombia, so why don't they try that also in Venezuela, which could offer the transit for their product. But the thing is that the Lake Maracaibo, where most of the oilrigs located is very polluted, which would not seem nice at this time when the customers are becoming more and more ecological.

And the thing, what makes this thing problematic is that this lake is a bay, what is connected to the Caribean sea by channel. That means that every pollution, what is delivered to Lake Maracaibo would go straight to Caribean sea, which is a very bad thing, and that kind of things along with presidents, who are increasing their power and authorities.

That kind of thing would not seem good in the eyes of customers. And the thing, what could decrease the will to buy oil from Venezuela is the possibility, that there would establish Russian missile site. That thing could cause the second Cold War and the reaction for this kind of things could be similar to the famous Cuban Missile crises in 1963 when the world was almost in the nuclear war.

Strong leadership is the thing, what is sometimes supported very strongly.

Strong leadership is the thing, what is sometimes supported very strongly.

The young leaders are taking their positions in the top political positions. And that means that the opinions of young people must be noticed more and more sharply. The ability to get in the top position in the political system has opened young people the new way to effect in political culture. That opportunity is also starting to keep youngsters out of riots and start the new way to influence politics. They are taking part in political meetings, and that gives them the right and legal way to power in the nation. 

The word of the moment is "strong leadership". Everything that people are looking and doing is needed the thing, what is called as "strong leadership". ICT-systems, new workers, leaders of states and another kind of persons always need leadership, and why the leadership is extremely important, is the question, what we might face every time. Strong leadership means strict and clear orders, which are easy to follow. And the thing, what should make those rules clear, is that they are concern everybody in the company. 

Strong leadership is the thing, what is injected to the head of the people when they are in the School of Economics, and the motto in those cases is, that if they would establish companies, the shares should be distributed that way, that one person has the majority of those things. And that thing makes that person a leader of the company. 

The question is, who would invest in that kind of companies or rather saying who will come to the business as the minority owner? This is one way to show criticism in the work. 

Every time, when we are seeing news or stories about business life, we are facing the thing, what is called leadership. And the leaders of the nation should be strong because they are elected by voters, who have given them the power. Also, leaders are good persons to ask things, and if there is one single leader in the company, the offering lunch for that person is cheaper than offering them to all personnel. This is the thing, why everybody wants to support strong leaders. 

We have seen that the people, who are leaders of the nation, are always giving very good promises, and in the precise right moment everything goes straight to the wall. The reason for that kind of things is that there would be some little things, what those people don't tell normal people and the thing in political and other kinds of systems is that nobody takes a position in that system, if the system would not know that person. 

When we are observing things like new and young politicians, who are taking high places in their nations, we must remember that those people have taken part in politics from the very young age, and the thing is that they are getting their experience from that way. And in the modern time even the politician, who is under 40 years might have great records and knowledge in the political field. 

This is the thing, why people must start to listen to the voice of young people. That kind of things might be seen in strong benefit because of the change to take place and influence on politics would keep youngsters out from the street and riots, and take the legal ways to effect things, what would be done in the state. 

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10995212

Companies as part of business life

Companies as part of business life

We all want to be leaders of the big companies, and of course, that kind of thing is really important when we are thinking about a career, what we might do. And in the experience of the leading position of companies are important, when we are searching for very big positions in the big companies. That's why some people are establishing own companies because they want to show their management skills and make a network. But the thing is that before we are establishing any kind of firm, or we start to lead any kind of things in business life, we must know exactly what the company is.

The definition of the word "company" is that thing is a combination of service and product, what purpose is to make a financial benefit for the owners. Of course in SOAP (Service Oriented Application) service itself is the product, but service is also thing how the product is delivering to customer.

And if we want to make a successful business, we must have the necessary skills for that sector of business life, what we have chosen. This is the thing in the successful business. If we make a bad job, we must pay damages and that kind of things are spoiling our reputation if we sometimes want to seek a job as the leader of big companies.

In the working life is billions of people, who are chosen the wrong career, because of their first experience of some jobs is bad. The person can be a perfect chef or perfect person for customer service, but the bad experience in the first contact with working life would turn studies to law schools and another kind of things, and that thing is really sad.

But if we establish a firm, we must make a backup plan, because sometimes people who don't know right people are not getting customers. Good professional skills are not enough when we must get contracts. Selectors of subcontractors of big and well-known companies are getting thousands of offers in a month, and the thing is that those actors seem good in the CV:s of the people, who are working in some other company.

And that kind of contracts is a good opportunity to make social contracts and increase the social network with the leaders of a well-known company. So that's why some offers are getting buried in the Email boxes. This is the reason, why we should get somebody, who would recommend us for those people. But if we do bad work, that thing is maximizing damage, because that person might lose trust for our skills and ability to handle problems and projects.

Following the law is always important because as you might know criminal registration is not a very good recommendation in any position of business life. And also we must realize, that we must not increase corruption or somehow use unethical methods in business. They are bad for reputation, which is a more and more important thing in business life because people are sharper with things, like ecology, humanity, and another kind of things.

If the conditions of product things are unethical, that thing would uncover on the Internet very soon, and who wants to buy the product, what would cost lives in somewhere. Also, things like cartels and other illegal methods in competitions are very soon uncovered. This is the reason, why we should consider our training. If we would have some else training what is suitable for business life, we must realize, that somebody would start to make reports for cartels.

Things like sports clubs are nice hobbies, but they are causing so-called "conspiracy theories" about the cartels, which means contracting prices between the companies. And if that kind of things would uncover, the result would be extremely big penalties and long court processes. This is one point of view to business life.

The right-wing politics and nationalism

The right-wing politics and nationalism

Right-wing politicians are always connected with the nationalism and another kind of things like militarism. But when we are looking at history, also left-wing movements are supporting military and being even more militaristic than right-wing governments. And as we see in the cases like uniting Germany the same politicians, who were like national heroes, turned to be the most unpopular political leaders in the history, and Helmut Kohl flees from stages in the rain of eggs. But when we are looking at the right-wing government's relationship with independence, we must remember that popularity is a volatile thing.

When the leaders of the government are telling that some nation should make union with another land, and sometimes those leaders are telling that their nations should leave those unions. This is the thing in history, and always there is some argument, what supports those decisions. And the opinion of the journalists has always colored the news about those big things. When we are thinking about the crisis and constitutional problems, we must remember one golden rule: that thing is that also constitution is how we want to read that text.

When we would think that some Great Britain flees from the European Union, we must say, that there might be people, who are willing to begin new discussions with the membership of the same union. This kind of things is typical for the politics of today. And one of the thing, what brings this kind of things in the public is that there are so few things in the world, what are giving topics for media.

One of the major things what gives breaks for military solutions in crisis is that the new nations are joining the "nuclear club", and will to get those armaments are decreasing the will to get military solutions in conflicts. The nuclear weapons have influence, that the leaders of the nations would want to discuss things more than ever before. There are many things changed in the world, and one thing is that the so-called "official press" doesn't control information anymore.

And that brings so-called faked news closer to the normal people than ever before. But one question remains on the air. Why we ever discussed how attitudes of reporters have influenced to the text, what is written about something? There has been news also in respected media which is prejudiced in purpose or without purpose. That means that when we want to believe something very hard, that thing might make us blind. We might not understand that something, what we might think as fact might be an only rumor. And do we ever dare to confess, that we are wrong?

What if something that we have believed as true proven as lie or wrong? Would we want to go to the front of people and say, "I've been wrong in 20 years"? In those cases, the question is about authority. Somehow the attitudes of the community are that elder people are always right. That thing is of course because we need to respect those people, but when they are wrong, and the case is scientifically proven, we must accept that thing.

But would we want to confess that thing to our children? That's another difficult question because that thing would turn the image what we want to give our children different. We would not be perfect anymore. In my childhood were people, who teach that adults were perfect, and they didn't make any mistakes. And in younghood, we hoped to get the same position what our parents had. But then the Internet and social media turned things.

We had the opportunity to check facts from the sources, and that made the first time possible that we were wrong in front of our children. In our younghood, the books, where were information were too high, that we couldn't take them, and suddenly we could get all the information straight from the net, and that turned us erring people. Even if we would not that our children see from the internet how children should make, and we can censor those pages by using authority, we cannot censor the homepages what are telling what is going on on Earth, or what is going on in space programs.

In the past, we could say, that we need that telephone and modem, but then we got high-speed mobile Internet, what made those excuses impossible, and that means we must say that we are right because adults are always right. And sometimes those things cause little bit embarrassing situation when our children open the homepages, where is the data, what is against our opinion.