Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser (1812-1833) was one of the most mysterious cases in the history of Europe. He came from nowhere to Nuremberg at the age of 16. When we are looking at the sources, the birthday has sometimes claimed to be 28 or maybe 30 April or 29 September 1812 and where those days have been found is not mentioned. I have written many times about this boy, who came from nowhere and faced his fate at the age of 21 by the hand of an assassin, whoever captured. The mysterious case began, when the young boy walked to the military barrack and gave the letter, what is claimed to write by his mother. There is a couple of source after this text, and you might check those persons names from those links. 

He could only say the words "I want to become an officer like my father" and then the word "horse", what he. repeated twice, or this is how that thing has been documented. There are many documents on the internet, and that's why I don't start to write about the story, what you can read from the net, but here I must ask one question, what is seen by the face of that boy.

The question is Kaspar Hauser one member of the family of Napoleon Bonaparte?

It is suspected that Kaspar Hauser lived in one single room in the early years of his life. That boy was mentally normal, which means that there was some kind of very important reason, why he was kept in the locked room. But there are a couple of remarkable things that people who have investigated this case have been noticed and the first one was that Kaspar had very soft feet. And the second one was that he walked like a drunk, which meant that he might have a problem with direction instinct, or he was drunk but the alcohol can be given him with injection straight to the blood. Was this injection mean lethal or was it given to confess the guards, that the boy was dead? And if that thing is true, some of the people, who were near him might be that person who took him near Nurenberg.

That thing is causing suspicious that somebody might have tried to kill that boy on that day when he arrived in the city of Nuremberg 26th April 1828. Maybe the murderer has given too little alcohol, and Kaspar survived in that attempt. Maybe the killer has given alcohol and then left the unconscious boy to die. The thing, that makes this case so interesting is that nobody seems to see, where that boy came. The soft feet gave a very weak hint about the conditions, where he was kept. The thing is that he was kept on the soft floor, and in the room, what was tall enough that Kaspar could stand.

 And because he could walk, somebody had given him a model that he could learn that skill. Or in some bad jokes is claimed that Kaspar Hauser has been in the space station, because of zero gravity conditions are making balance very bad. And that kind of thing will explain the teetering walk. And maybe that thing would offer a very good topic for some novel, where Kaspar Hauser has been trapped in Solar Warden. But let's continue more seriously. When we are thinking about the end of that boy, we must realize that after the first strike, where he got the scar on his forehead, that thing might be made also by the woman. 

The weapon was the meat knife, what looked like an ax, and that would mean that killer acted in panic. That means that this person might think that Kaspar could recognize the attacker. And when the attacks were made, that boy must be taken to another city and protected better. The second attack that was faithful lets many questions open. The injuries, what that boy got were not killed immediately. So is it possible that those attacks were made for setting up that person dead, and maybe somebody changed the identity of that young man?

Lord Stanhope had that kind of relationship that this kind of thing can be done. And did Stanhope knew something, what other people didn't know? He was a very high-rank member of the British government, and that means that this kind of person would not walk anywhere without a good reason. 

And that tells that the killer has not skills to make that thing. There is a theory that Kaspar was a member of some royal family. If that thing was fake, the people who were behind that kind of case were behind those attacks they might not want to kill that boy. The acted murder attempts would make the story more effective and convincing but then the attacker just made a mistake. The question is how much Kaspar knew about the stories, that he was a member of some royal family? But those violate actions make his story famous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Hauser

https://www.edubloxtutor.com/kaspar-hauser/

Upper Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Hauser_Kreul.jpg

Downer Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Kaspar_hauser.jpg/250px-Kaspar_hauser.jpg

What thing made Cambridge Analytica so effective?

What thing made Cambridge Analytica so effective?

One very interesting detail in the next case is that Cambridge Analytica got the benefit, that the name of that company was connected to the University of Cambridge, and that was causing, that people let that company search the data, what they handle when they have used the internet. People didn't think that the data, what they delivered or handled affect the political system of elections any kind of ways.

The case of Cambridge Analytica the thing was that the first time artificial intelligence was used for investigating opinions of people, and then the politicians could fix their speeches to please the great audience. In the Cambridge Analytica case, the thing, what allowed to hack political system, the tool what was used, was the algorithm, what was created for commercial use.

The idea was that the software, what meters people interest to the commercial products were used to product used for creating a political program, and this kind of things are making this kind of products very interesting multi-use programs what can use in many purposes. The key element is that the politician is the product like some soap or another thing, what we are finding in the supermarket.

And also politicians want to boost their careers, so maybe in the one day tomorrow or the future, we will see more cases like this. This case opened people eyes, that data is ever harmless. The thing is about the algorithm, which detects the interest of the politician by simply metering the time, what the person would spend while looking at the texts and videos, where the politician introduces ideas. The algorithm is similar to what is used for selecting the music for festivals.

They detect clicks to videos, and then the part of the video, which is mostly rewatched, and that thing tells the analysis, what kind of music some kind of people want to hear. This method can combine to the automatic collecting the data. But when we are thinking about the written text, how we are looking for things, what might interest people. The idea is that the political program is like some kind of rock festivals and the political program is entirety.

That thing is that the things, what politicians are promising are things, what are collected from many details. So how we could find out, what kinds of things are giving the votes to the right person. The thing is that people could give the text of the speeches of politicians, and ask would that person give the vote to some politician? During that time the system meter the time, what a person spends with text, but at the same time system detects, what part of this text the person would the individual reads. Those things are telling about interest for that thing.

And when the person would answer, the algorithm or artificial intelligence would meter the length of the breaks between those words, and also it detects the octave, and that thing would tell if the person is getting excited and that also tells if a person lies. The question is simple, "would you give your vote to that politician, and tell me why"? The thing, what helped this company in its mission is that the name, what this company used, connected it with the University of Cambridge, and it made people allow the Cambridge Analytica to collect the data, and use it in their purposes as I wrote at the beginning of this text.

The case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, and his radical cancer treatment

The case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, and his radical cancer treatment

Sometimes researchers are prosecuted that they are delivering too optimistic information. The thing, what researchers use are the sources, what is given to them, and if their conclusions are wrong, the reason could be in the information, what has given to them. When somebody wants to bring the new medicine to marketing, that product must pass the very intensive and sharp tests. And of course, things like wrong hope must not be taken in those tests. 

Sometimes has claimed that some chemotherapy or other cancer medicals can affect only the patients, who have certain blood type. But there is no evidence about this kind of cases, where blood type effects to the power of the medicine. 

There is a strange story about the man, who has probably invented the most revolutionary treatment for cancer. The thing, what makes this case interesting is why the trials against this man began so early? This is the case, where the cancer was care with so-called antioxidants is interesting because Burzynski was made those experiments by using the new medicine in clinical conditions, and that means this man needed permission for those tests.

In this text is a link to the film and other data, what is visible on the internet, and those links are conducted to the therapy, what Dr. Stanislaw Burzinsky has made in this very difficult area of medical sciences. The thing, why I write this is the fast actions of medical authorities, and as you see those people lose their case, and the clinic has nice homepages, where you might see what was the result. 

And soon when he reported the results to the Texas medical authority, that instance tried to remove the medical license of Dr. Burzinsky. This is an interesting part of this case because of the lack of chemotherapy must be seen in the records of the hospital or that clinic. So is the reason for those prosecutions something like choosing the patients? And here I mean is there somebody, who was not healed?

Sometimes there are patients, who are not taking their medicals because medicines make them sick, and some people have the psychical need to stay in care. This kind of things are so-called Münchausen syndrome, what is the need to be in the hospital, and cancer would bring those people attending. Münchausen is the syndrome, where a patient is asking for attention by playing sick, and sometimes cancer would bring people to see those patients in their home. That causes the need to make cure longer by leaving medicals, and this thing is really dangerous because the strongest cancer cells are leaving in the body, what causes cancer would become more deadly. 

And the superiority of Dr. Burzynsky must know about this experimental treatment. If we are thinking that 40 patients had this cure, that means this medical treatment must be given a long time, and if there is some kind of problems with that kind of cure, those supervisors must be seen those things. So if that treatment was not effective, why the superiority of Dr. Burzynski didn't make a report to authorities? When we are thinking about antioxidants, they are chemicals what are denying cells to get oxygen, and this is the thing, what supports the effect of that antioxidant, what might in this case just close the oxygen source of those cells. 

But as you see there are many types of cancers, and I don't know, what kind of tumors Dr. Byrzinsky treated by this kind of medicals, and this means that this product would not be a hoax. But if we are thinking this kind of medicals, there is one possibility, and that is that there is something, what medical authorities don't want people to know about this kind of chemicals. I don't know what is the effect of this antioxidant. The thing is that if the antioxidant acts to every cancer types in the world, that invention, what is made 30 years ago might revolutionize the cancer treatment. 

And the thing is that the trials against Dr. Byrzinsky have continued over 20 years. That thing is very remarkable, in this very interesting tale about revolutionary medicine, what is claimed as a hoax. But if that man has made some mistakes or faked documents, why the medical authorities are not reported to police or published those documents, what causes the prosecutions. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WILCeNkzmHo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WILCeNkzmHo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBm2NSMeMhk

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/individual-therapies/antineoplaston-therapy

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burzynski_clinic

https://www.burzynskiclinic.com/

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9833-factitious-disorder-imposed-on-self-munchausen-syndrome

Why Russian agents attacked Skribal?

Why Russian agents attacked Skribal?

Trump has ordered new sanctions against Russia because of the Novochoke-case, where 5 persons were injured, and two of them were dead. Attackers have been claimed to being high-ranking GRU officials or at least another one has ranked as colonel, if we would believe about Wikipedia in this case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Sergei_and_Yulia_Skripal

The attack against Sergei Skribal is a very complicated thing. The attackers used poison, which connects the case straight to the Russian government. And the men who made that strike were recognized to GRU agents. Those things, unfortunately, show that the person, who is behind that attentate is working in the Russian government. This Skripal attentate has similarities with the Polonium-murder, where the ex-KGB agent has been murdered by using Polonium-210, which is very highly radioactive material.

And there are two possibilities. One of them is that the Russian government is behind those cases or the Russian laboratories would have security leak. If those materials like Novichoke and Polonium would get to wrong hands, the results will be devastating.

This is a very interesting thing, which has damaged the relationship between Russia and the Western World. And the thing is that even if the Russian government confess that it has nothing to do with that crime, the actors, in this case, were identified and easy to connect with the crime.

This is the thing, what wonders me. Why those men used poison named "Novichoke"? And why they didn't even try to hide their tracks? Did Russians or the persons, who were behind that action think, that the nobody even dares to say a thing about this case?

When we are thinking about the weapons that were used, we must ask, why those killers didn't choose assault rifles or some normal poison like Ricin? Those things could not so easily be connected to the Russian authorities? This kind of actions is really bad for the reputation of any government in the world. So who gave orders about this strike? Those people, who made this crime didn't operate by their motion.

If those murders would be done by using the assault rifle, that thing could be explained about the personal revenge against Skripal. In that case, the killer could claim that Skribal has made something to self while that man worked in KGB, and then the thing would not so easy to connect to the Russian government.

Sometimes when I think about the relationship, what KGB had to power, there could be persons even in the highest positions in Russian security and governmental authorities would be found men and women, whose career that service destroyed during Soviet era. Those people might have the opportunity to hide their past when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

So could there some person, who has something hidden in the past, what has something to do with Skripal? This kind of things are very important things and this kind of cases must be solved because if some government kills people, who are against its policy, must the other nations give a signal that this kind of things is not tolerated. And if the hardcore killing chemicals and radioactive material can be stolen from the laboratories, that thing can cause risk for many people.