Politics and planes

 

Politics and planes

The nuclear strike capacity is the most calculated firepower on the Earth and this kind of thing are the extreme reasons, why the number of certain aircraft like stealth-bombers and nuclear-capable stealth-attack planes is limited. The way of think in this kind of case is that if some nuclear force is too dominating, that thing would addict to "push the button", and that means that the nuclear strike force must have the opposite force. 

And the idea is that the military threat, what is outside the borders keeps the military force busy, and that way to think keeps the world stable because of military rebellion would cause that foreign forces would start to attack against those troops because they want to eliminate that threat. So this might be the reason, why the military forces have not taken control of Russia or the USA during the Cold War era. But the thing is that public use of power is different than a covert way to control people. 

When we are thinking about the nuclear strike capacity, the primary role of those weapons is to threaten other nations. The nuclear shield would attack every country's very uncomfortable idea and sometimes I have thought that the North-Korean nuclear weapons are like the gift from God for the USA and South-Korea, which would argue their passive attitude to that country by afraid of their nuclear power. So is there something, what is hidden from the public in that program? 

The primary role in the traditional nuclear arsenal is the bombers and other aircraft. Idea is that when those planes are sent to mission, they can also call back, and if the military forces use the ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles)-missiles or any other nuclear missile, there would be no way to call those weapons back, but the modern technology has changed that kind of operative way to think. 

Miniature space shuttles can be used as the orbital version of FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System)

If we are thinking of the stuff like X-37B(1) and MiG-105 (2), those miniature shuttles are suitable for use as the orbital cruise missiles, which can be returned to Earth. They can send to the orbital trajectory, and if the situation requires the use of that kind of system, they can dive to target. 

Sometimes both space shuttles NASA:s shuttles(3) and Soviet "Buran" (4)have been suspected to use as the FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bobardmanent System) (5)-bombers, what can send to the orbiter and equip with those miniature shuttles. That thing allows a very fast attack against targets. There are rumors that somewhere has been created the OBS (Orbital (or Fully Orbital) Bombardment Systems), what would be the satellites, what are equipped with conventional or nuclear bombs. 

Sometimes it is suspected that Northrop-Grumman X-47B (6)has also some kind of space going version, which can be used as the stealth-version of those hypersonic missiles, which will send to orbital, and then they would attack against the targets or return to base if the mission doesn't require attack. 

Hypersonic missiles are deadly even they don't have the warheads. The kinetic energy that has released while the weapon hits the target is extremely high. If the missile hits to aircraft carrier by the speed of Mach 8, that means that the aircraft carrier would vaporize in seconds. The nuclear weapon like hydrogen bomb can be taken in the cargo bay. Also, normal cruise missiles can refuel during the flight and artificial intelligence makes possible to return those weapons to base for service. 

The new robot tankers might be meant for use with those cruise missiles. That kind of system might be the normal Tomahawk missile, what has wheels under them. The thing is that cruise missiles are drones, which are equipped with nuclear and conventional warheads. 

So if we want to equip the drones like Predator with a nuclear warhead we could create the device, what can orbit above the battlefield and then explode their warheads. One suspected weapon, what might have this kind of system is X-47B, which can be equipped with the nuclear bomb, which can either drop to target or detonate internally. 

This kind of system is highly classified, but those platforms would be suitable for that kind of mission. And the thing is that this kind of system can send to the attack by using various platforms. They can use regular runways, aircraft carriers or shoot to space with a rocket. And then those missiles or drones can dive to the target with hypersonic speed. 

(1)

https://www.space.com/25275-x37b-space-plane.html

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-105

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)

(5)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Orbital_Bombardment_System

(6)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_X-47B

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg

Being smart or being wise that's the problem

Being smart or being wise that's the problem

Almost every time, when we are talking about wisdom, we are facing the proverb, that the smart person would survive from troubles, but the wise man would not ever go in those troubles, but is wise man smart? And what actually is wisdom? Is wisdom the thing, that we would grow a beard, and sit in some chair, and tell many things, what doesn't mean a thing? 

Or is the wisdom only the ability to double check everything, before we would do something? Sometimes the wisdom is mentioned only as of the way to say, that elder person is smart. So the smart young inmate is an only smart and smart old person is wise because that would tell people, about the respect of that elder person.

Smart is the world, which means the young person, who uses glasses, and make things, what sometimes are successful and sometimes not, and the wise man is the master, who supervises the work, and the reason, why master doesn't make mistakes is, that the master would not make practical work in that precise project. But in the process, what made that person the master, that master has someday before being the young student, who made mistakes. And mistakes are teaching the person.

But we can think, that states are also persons, and mistakes are teaching also states and state leaders about things, what they should not do. This is why we have national archives, that the results of the decisions can found from those files. So archives are the memory of the nations. Every person in the world are making mistakes, and if the person has a large working area, that means that mistakes have large scale influence, if they are made by the leader of the state.

And here we can continue to think about the wrong decision, and ask who is responsible that the wrong person is working as the leader of the state? The head of the state might be awful, but the thing is that regular persons have given their votes and support for that person, and that is the thing, what we must remember. They have allowed that person being the head of the state, and that's it. 

But when we are thinking about things like nuclear weapons, and the scientists, who have made those things, we are always facing the question, that who made decisions to get those weapons. And then we might make another induction thought, and ask, "should we get everything, what somebody can do"? If we see something nice in the shop, should we get that thing? That's another way to ask, should the military always get and produce everything, what science can give to those organizations?

And in this case, we must realize, that persons, who are creating weapons and make another kind of science are working for the governments, who pay their salaries. They must dare to say, people, if some weapon or equipment is too effective. And then we are facing the situation, that military commanders want always minimize their own losses, what makes war so brutal.

But those men are trained to make decisions what costs the life of own side or another side, and that commander might rather want to see that every loss of human lives happens on another side. After that, this man or woman can tell the president that the mission was successful and own losses were minimum. This satisfies the political leaders, and that's it.

That is the philosophy, why some weapons are getting in the arsenal. But the problems are the non-lethal weapons, what are making the conflicts more complicated and increase the will to use weapons against the opposite side. One of those non-lethal weapons is the opiate bomb. That bomb would stun the targets, and then the own troops can collect the guns away without human casualties. 

But also psychological weapons are very effective, and that means, in theory, the people on the opposite side would incite to rebel by using satellites, what are pushing air molecules by using electromagnetic radiation. That would allow creating the large-area virtual loudspeaker, which can cover the entire country.

The electromagnetic radiation would push the air molecules and cause the silent noise, which would be really influential to the people if that would continue a long period, and repeats the message simultaneously. If the targeted persons don't know about that kind of systems they are even more influential, and if it is using many weeks or months, that would cause interesting reactions in the mind of those people.