Six clicks separate people from each other.

“A long-observed social phenomenon suggests that people across the globe are separated by surprisingly few connections. Credit: Stock” (ScitechDaily, Scientists Prove There Are Just Six Degrees of Separation in a Social Network)

“In a networked world, we are about six steps away from another individual. In the world of the Internet. That means six clicks separate us from any person who uses the internet. This is one of the most incredible ideas. The idea dates back to 1967. Harvard psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment. He sent letters to random people and then asked them to send those letters to their closest friends. This is a classic chain letter experiment. And of course, Milgram asked. People. Those who participated in that network test wrote their names on that paper. The idea was that Milgram wanted to know how far a random person was from Milgram. Most of those letters never return. But in letters. Those that returned were about five to six names. Before they returned to the hand of Milgram. 

This means that there are approximately six people between members of the same network. This causes an interesting thing about networks. People can be members of the same networks. But they ever. Head of each other. And this causes. The situation that we all know. Some people might say that somebody. That person knows, knows that third-party person, or knows somebody who has that name. Those people don’t necessarily know the person. But they know the name. 

“Milgram concluded from his small-world experiments that any two random people in the United States would be linked by a chain of (on average) six steps.” (Wikipedia, Small-world experiment)

In that image, the balls are people who are not involved in the chain. But those people transmit information to their own networks. The same models are used to track the origins of the epidemics. Or, those models can also be used. To track. Things like drug dealers. When some outside actor transfers information into their own networks. That causes a situation where information spreads to global networks. 

“The small-world experiment comprised several experiments conducted by Stanley Milgram and other researchers examining the average path length for social networks of people in the United States. The research was groundbreaking in that it suggested that human society is a small-world-type network characterized by short path lengths. The experiments are often associated with the phrase "six degrees of separation", although Milgram did not use this term himself.  (Wikipedia, Small-world experiment)

But then. We can think. About the networks and their problem. When we think that we all have two or three good friends, we must understand. A couple of things. In information networks, “friend” is not necessarily. The individual person. The friend is the thing. There, we share information. We all have more than just two relationships. If we think that we are three actors, who tell everything to each other. We forget. We can think that humans have two hands. They might all have two connections. Those two close friends are only one connection. And then we have the connection. None of our three people ring knows. When we share information with those outsiders that causes a situation, that information starts to spread in the network. 

Things like married people can use or look at each other’s Facebook accounts. The “Friend” can also be some group. Like a soccer team discussion forum. If we have two trusted fiends in the information network, we often forget that those fiends also have two trusted friends. But there is a possibility that those people or groups. That we think of as “fiend”. Might not know each other. So we might know those two people. But maybe one or both know some third-party member. This third-party member. Is the thing. That causes information to spread through the network. In the networked world. We don’t know. Who really is the person we see on the net? People can claim. That they are even the Secretary General of the U.N. 

The model. That. Between every user of the net. Cause interesting thoughts. Six clicks. Separate us from the biggest chiefs in the business world. Six clicks separate us from a serial killer. And six clicks separate us from secret agents and drug dealers. This means. That the secret agent, the biggest boss, the serial killer, and the drug dealer. They are always part of our networks. This causes an interesting thought. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-prove-there-are-just-six-degrees-of-separation-in-a-social-network/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-world_experiment

 

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Project Mogul and extreme biological research

Project Mogul and extreme biological research

Project Mogul

When we are talking about projects like "Mogul" there might be a very interesting thing with those projects, and that thing is that there might be many projects with similar names. So when we are looking at the film about "Project Mogul" (1) and here I mean the balloon project, what mission was to research Soviet nuclear explosions by recording the sound of those explosions, and look like the shape of those balloons, we might think that those balloons might be attempted to use many kinds of tests. 

And one of them might be that targeting those balloons with high-power radio rays, the system might have the ability to drive those radar signals to down, and if there is another radio ray with different polarity, what would target to that point, that causes the electric arc. Or those systems can cause extremely high-level EMP stress to the target point. 

The secretive genetic experiments

But there is a possibility that those balloons have used also for biological experiments. That means that the fertilized eggs and other kinds of things would send to the high atmosphere, and the researchers would test the effect of the cosmic radiation on those things. But there is one very interesting theory about the operation "Mogul", which is one of the most exotic research projects in the world. The thing is connected with humanoids, and the idea is "are those little aliens the result of genetic research, and created by humans self?". 

So in this theory, the aliens are the result of the long term genetic project, what mission is to create super-intelligent humans, what would take the place in the research. The thing is that in those researches the scientists would make two genetically pure lines, and then those lines would be connected, which makes the so-called genetically stronger individual. 

In this process, the genetically enrichment and degeneration causes that the population would turn to genetically one single individual, and then the populations can be connected. But this thing is a very brutal and inhumane way to operate in the field of genetics. 

There is a possibility that the humanoids are walking on the streets. The idea is that by using nanotechnology we would remove the DNA sequences, what is controlling the evolution of the brains from our genomes, and replace that with the sequence, what is taken from the alien body, and that means that we could replace the brains of the individual with the brains of aliens. 

The connection to Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov and monkey soldiers. The goal of this project was to create the soldier, which would live a short period after released to the mission. And then that creature would die, what denies it to uncover the secrets and the reason for the mission. 

But if we would not have aliens, we could double that sequence, and the creature, what we would make, would be more intelligent than we are. And this thing has been caused terrible thoughts in the mind of humans. Those things are connected to the investigations, what Ivan Ivanov researched(2) in the Soviet Union under the supervision of the NKVD the Stalin's secret police. 

The thing is that Ivanov researched things like transferring heads between bodies and other things. There is a possibility, that this man or some other person like Dr. Mengele tried to transfer the human neurons in the neural channel of the fetus (3). In the film, the experiment has been done in other ways. 

That would be possible to create an intelligent monkey, which could do the missions for Stalin or the NKVD. Is that the thing, that is hidden from publicity in the cases, when people are talking about Stalin's monkey army. Ivanov was not the only person, who tried to cross the man and monkey, and there is claiming, that also Mengele tried that thing. 

The thing is that the idea was to create a short-living hybrid, which could be easy to control, and if that hybrid has died after the mission, it would not tell anything. The lack of immune defense would make them easy to supervise, and that is one of the reasons, why those extremely brutal experiments are done. 

(1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yETl1cW_WHI

(2)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShvOtdWq69Y

(3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iyD6RP7g2I

Could dolphins be smarter than humans?

Could dolphins be smarter than humans?

This is a really good question because the Dophin brains are bigger than human brains, but the rugs of human brains are deeper, and that means that this structure must have meaning when we are thinking about the level of intelligence. But let's go back to business and think about the level of intelligence (1). 

The dolphins and whales might be smarter than most of the animals, and then we are facing one really interesting detail. We haven't even researched the intelligence of the water animals for a very long time. We have taught them the nice tricks, but we haven't researched their ability to solve problems. And then we should ask, what kind of problems we would give those creatures for solving? 

What would be a good problem for the sea animal, what it wants to solve? And what kind of problem would keep it interesting about the case, where it must cooperate with the research team, or research team must cooperate with a dolphin. 

We don't know are dolphins more intelligent than humans, and we cannot ask that thing from dolphins themselves. The description of the intelligence is the level, how the character would solve problems. And that thing might look simple. But there is a thing, what we must understand. 

If we cannot give verbal tests to the test subject, that means we must make some other tests, if we want to find out how fast the creature would solve problems. In this case, there are some kind problems with those tests, where the animal is looking for food from the bags. The dolphin has a sonar system, which allows it to see things, that are hidden in bags, and that's why we must say that dolphin was unfair because it has that sensor, that we don't have. 

Or what if dolphin doesn't like that fish at all? If those creatures would be intelligent, they might be individuals, which means that maybe the dolphin doesn't like some fish species, which might taste different in the mouth of dolphins. 

And dolphin is so different, what we are, that we cannot say, how that creature would solve problems. Does it only use its sonar or does it use some kind of thinking process in those cases? The question is does the high level of intelligence require the ability to communicate with other members of the group? 

And what if the communication between the dolphins is minimum, but those creatures could solve problems? When we are thinking about the intelligence level of dolphins and their language, we are just about 20 years researched the communication of the animals. And during those researches, the sounds of the dolphins have been recorded and then played to other groups. 

Then the researchers have been followed by the reactions of the group, and that thing makes the research very difficult. If we would want to find out, what the communication between the dolphins involves we should research them in the natural environment. And that means that we should have very good equipment, which can operate independently even years and observe those animals even years that way, that they cannot notice it. 

In the natural environment, the language of the animals is acting like human language. It would be rich, and there would be many terms and details. In prison, the language of the animals would be poor, like human beings and they would be stressed. 

(1)

https://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/human-intelligence-versus-whales-and-dolphins/

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Tursiops_truncatus_01.jpg/1200px-Tursiops_truncatus_01.jpg

The quantum gravity as the source of antigravity

The quantum gravity as the source of antigravity

Quantum gravity can open the road to real antigravity.

When we are thinking about real antigravity, what would be created by using quantum gravity, we might think that thins kind of thing could be something, what we cannot do. But in fact, the antigravity is possible, if we would turn the gravity to operate the opposite way. And how we can do that thing? The idea is that we could think the singularity could answer that kind of thing.

So, in this case, we could make the wormhole, what is smaller than the nucleus, and then turn it to "U"-shape. The distance between the begin and the endpoint could be very close, and this thing can make possible to create the levitation. This thing means that the entrance to the wormhole would be close to the exit of this tunnel, and if there is another but a lighter black hole, that thing would make possible that the material would move to one direction in the wormhole, and if that thing would be below the craft, it would raise it to air.

"U-shaped singularity could theoretically turn gravity to its opposition.

But there is another way to make those black holes. They could be opposite sides of the craft, and that thing allows them to levitate craft between them. And there are many problems with those things, and the smallest is not to create the singularity. The thing is that the energy pumping to the quarks would make possible to make this no-balanced wormhole, which can oppositely turn gravity.

There is also the third possibility, and that is by creating a very high-mass gas atom, the thing could also operate as the crane, which can raise objects. There is one thing, what sad thing in quantum gravity. And that is that this technology can cause as the most devastating weapon, what history has ever created.

The thing is that singularity is a black hole. And even if it cannot pull the atoms inside it, it can pull gas molecules and atoms together. That means it can detonate the fusion weapon or form the nitrogen fusion in the atmosphere. This kind of thing can risk the future of the entire planet, and in the last case, the fusion can cause the growth of a black hole. Even that thing would exist only a  couple of seconds, that thing can pull the entire planet through it. And the explosion of the erupting black hole would be very big. But the short term singularity can curve entire warships.

Quantum gravity would make possible to create the most deadly weapons in the world.

The synthetic gamma-ray bursts, what can be created by nuclear-powered X-ray lasers would allow creating the small size black hole. That thing can cause the creation of singularity if the black hole is adjusted with some other black holes.

One of the most exotic ideas, that quantum gravity has caused in the field of the military is that the drone would somehow form the singularity between the laser and enemy command center. That singularity can be used to send high-power laser impulse to that target, but how the drone can do that thing.

The idea is to use the nuclear-boosted X-ray-laser for creating the extreme energy load, which is targeted to that drone. In the middle of this drone is the perfect ball-shaped glass ball. And when the high-power X-ray impulse would hit the drone, that thing will turn the glass ball to singularity, and the system can adjust the black hole by giving radio-wave bursts to that thing.

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

More about the philosophy of history research

More about the philosophy of history research

In the beginning, we must say that time travel by watching historical records by using virtual reality tools is a very easy thing to feel, what some city was looking like in the 19th century. But the problem is that this kind of thing has not to effect modern times, even if we would see people like Ulysses S. Grant talking with some Mexican revolutionists. Those things are of course interesting, but they have not to affect the modern world.

And the only thing, that we must realize is that we are all descendants of the same African monkey. Then something happened and one monkey took some kind of club and hit another monkey to death, which caused the first war in the history of mankind. This is the thing, what we normally don't think when we are talking about things like violent behavior of human being. But the fact is that there was always the first act. So in one day, one monkey made the first murder, and that might cause the hate, what is visible even today.

There is a tale that those monkeys who were called as Cain and Abel were committed that crime together, but the thing, that they made was so embarrassing that they couldn't tell the truth to other monkeys. And then those individuals became the first trollers, because they didn't, of course, want peace, that the actions of those monkeys would be uncovered. The thing in this fictional story is that there was the first act, that made humans hate together.

When we are thinking about the Holy Bibles story about Cain and Abel, and when the little brother killed the elder brother who was justified to control the farm of their father, I must say that this is one of the most interesting parts of the Old Testament. The thing is that of course, Cain was jealous because his brother had the right to get the farm, and the other thing is that those rituals and other things that made Abel the ruler were not done with Cain. And that means that this man was something else than the routinized user of power.

So why the position of the eldest child or especially boy was so special? The thing is that this way, where the big brother would dun the land like farm and state if the family was royal caused that this would be the way to keep other people out from the power was selecting the strongest person on the seat of power. And the physical strength was protected by the eldest boy against the questions that younger siblings might ask.

The leadership was protected by choosing the strongest members of families for some ritual, which was reserved only for eldest boys. That made them feel as adult and strong because they were meant to hide things like weaknesses and other kinds of things. And if the strongest person in the family would support some system, others would easily follow that member, because of that individual is the strongest in their team.

A short tale about research and pharaoh Tutankhamen

A short tale about research and pharaoh Tutankhamen

Picture I

Have you ever thought that pharaoh Tutankhamen was handicapped? This means that he could ever rule Egypt. And there are theories, that this young pharaoh killed a couple of hours before the coronation ceremony. There is also theory, that Tutankhamen got a child with another handicapped person, which means that this thing might be racial refining.

So-called pure line genetic refining is sometimes used with racehorses, where is created two pure lines of genomes, and then those degenerated genomes would be driven together for creating so-called "super individual". The thing that will feed the rumors are the death of Lord Carnarvon and archeologist Howard Carter, what might be a natural accident, and the thing that the rope was still in the door of KV-62 (The number of the grave or tomb of Tutankhamen) has caused question, has somebody visit in that grave before Carvarnor and Carter? And if that is done, when that thing is done? The remarkable thing in Carter's life is that he died in the age of 64, and he finished his archeological career in this case.

So how long the hemp rope would stand in King's valley before bugs are eating it? Maybe it was just covered by some material like paraffin, where is mixed some poison, what denies the bugs to touch the rope. That would be the good explanation fro this hemp rope, what has been on the door since Tutankhamen was dead.

The thing is to have somebody visited in that grave before it's official opening? And was that person look for things like "the curse of Pharaoh", what might be somehow mutated bacteria. That bacteria turns to flesh-eating in the anaerobic conditions. Maybe the Germans want that thing in their weapon arsenal, and they might visit in that grave before Carnarvon and Carter. There is a possibility, that Carter has opened the door for making sure, that the grave was, what it should be.

That thing would save Carnarvon from disappointment. But if Carter concealed the position of the grave, when did he find it, in the books you might read that the budget and permission for digging was ended in the next day when the grave was found. So why Carnarvon accepted the requests Carter, who needed more time. And then the grave was found in 1922.

The death of Carnarvon is causing many rumors, and the most well-known explanation is that the Is it possible that somebody would put the killed cells of Carnarvon to his body? Was it made by purpose or accident? That thing would cause death to the victim, or was the thing some kind of ricin? Or was the reason for that thing only the allergic reaction of Carnarvon?

And when the work of this pharaoh was done, he was killed by high priests. Research is like police work, but it is not that thing? When researcher handles material, that person must realize that in many times the guilty would not get punishment. And the reason why some historical things are researched is because of pure interest, what has been happened in some cases, what we might think as the "historical truth".

This term is many times broken in public magazines and when researchers have got more effective systems for use, and the archives have, that means the old things have uncovered new dimensions for the cases, what we have already known. The thing what has been made the work of researchers easier is that attitudes for many things have been changed, and research itself has found the new values.

That means that we have found many new ways to find things, what we might feel right. We all know things like Napoleon's wars, but the reason, why Napoleon went to war is not so clear.

Of course, there was a revolution in France, and the people in France wanted to deliver those values, "Freedom, brotherhood, and equality", but the thing why Napoleon started the war might be that he wanted to turn the national convert's notice away from the internal enemies and stop the internal violence in that country. When we are thinking the things like war and peace, the reason why some nation went to conflicts is as important as the things, what happened during the war.

The thing is the reason and consequence are connected things, and without action is not reaction. This is the thing, what we must remember. When some cases are observing in the point of view of research, we are facing one of the most fascinating ideas in the field of research. If something is attempting to hide, that thing would bring the interest of that thing.

So like I have written at the beginning of this text if we are thinking that pharaoh Tutankhamen has degenerated, why those priests let that boy become pharaoh? There is one explanation, and that thing is that is it possible that young pharaoh made a child with a handicapped woman, and when the mission is done, that boy was released from duties by killing him, maybe just before coronation ceremony.

Probably those highest-ranking priests wanted to cover the thing, that pharaoh, who gave orders was handicapped and fully controlled by priests. This might be one of the greatest mysteries in history. The thing is that history is full of myths and stories, causing very many theories about bloodlines and another kind of things.

Picture I

https://i2.wp.com/defininggrace.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/TutsTomb_Header.jpg?fit=2340%2C940&ssl=1

Other civilizations and changing attitudes for things, what was self-evident in the past

Other civilizations and changing attitudes for things, what was self-evident in the past

When we are talking about things like other civilizations, we must go back to history and remember many TV-shows where the humanoids were some kind of joke. In that time there were no observations about other solar systems and in some popular scientific publications had the line that there would be no other solar systems and civilizations universe.

But as we know to develop the new type of telescopes what have new accuracy, there are observations about thousands of exoplanets. The last scientific news about the field of planet-hunting is the exoplanets, what are orbiting the Alpha Centauri, which makes possible that also double stars have planets. There are also remarkable observations about planets, what are orbiting stars, what is like the sun, but the observation of the multi-stellar system, what has planets are fascinating.

And when we are thinking about the forming of the planetary systems, we must realize that the brown dwarf can simply turn the planets to orbit it. In this kind of cases, the massive planet could have massive earth-size moons. But this is not writing about special cases, like planets that are orbiting the center star of the double-star system what members are far away from each other.

In that kind of cases, the planet could orbit between stars, and it might have life forms, what are active only a short period of the year of that planet. In this hypothetical case so-called open double-star systems where another member is in distance, what is the same, with a distance of Neptune, both stars might have own planetary system.

What if we would make contact with another civilization? Or rather saying, get signal from other civilization? First, we must understand that civilization could be very far away from us, and things like gravity lenses might focus that signal to our planet. That means that the signal would be visible only when the alien planet is in the right direction, which means that we could hear that signal only once.

So in those cases, we cannot even answer, if we want. And the second question is should we answer? If the aliens are hostile, we would be in big trouble. When we are facing another civilization, we must realize that the finding that thing would be the greatest scientific exploration, what we can think, and this kind of things are really difficult questions.

What we must do is to observe those signals, and then try to break their communications, and that thing is one of the most important things in the research. We should know exactly, who we would talk if we would someday answer. And before we would tell other people and the great audience about the aliens, we must say, that in that kind of cases, we would not need any kind of joke calls to those humanoids, or that thing could be really bad things.

So in this kind of things, we should hide the location of the star, where the signal has been coming. That would help the researchers to find out, what kind of thing is sending that message or signal. Here we must realize, that if the human race would someday receive the signal from another solar system, that would be the end of the era, that we would be only one intelligent civilization.

But the research of the possible extraterrestrial civilizations has been shown, how the attitudes are chancing also in the society, what is outside of the scientific community. The freedom of speaking about extraterrestrial civilization has been also symbolizing the changed attitudes, what science has been faced. There are many researches, which were not possible about ten to fifteen years ago, and one is the research about gender.

When I was young the gender was simply sex organs. That was enough, and until now we are faced that there are also other people than men and women, and that has been opened the eyes of the people, that the attitudes about the things, what were self-evidence are more complicated.

The writing about the way to make science

The writing about the way to make science

I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.

One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.

Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.

The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.

But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.

If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.

We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.

And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.

The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.

If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

When somebody is talking about futurology, what is science that research people relationship with technological advantages and their influence on society, we must realize, that there are many similarities with the writing of novels. Nobody has seen future, or at least nobody ever has given any prove about, what is happening in the future, or what kind of advantages there will be in far after the hundreds or thousands of years. And that's why people would sometimes call the futurology as "Astrophilosophy". That thing would consist of the thought about hypothetical space colonies and travel to other solar systems.

Astrophilosophy would be similar than the philosophy of state or "Platonism". It would handle the human and our society's relationship with astronomy and the universe. What would be right, and what would be wrong, when we would start to colonize the universe. Things like protecting nature on some planet, which is dangerous for us, but what might be the level of bacteria is an interesting way to think about the conquering space.

Or if we would someday force to leave our home planet Earth, have we right to enter the young solar system, and sterilize some of it's planets to our new home? And if we would force to leave Earth, and it would happen because of pollution, would we let the same thing continue in the new home planet? This kind of things might be interesting to think before we would start to create new colonies in the Universe.

When we are creating new colonies, we must realize, that we should also give them something. If they are the only side, what gives things, that would mean that this colony would cut the relationship to Earth. When we would create colonies, the persons who would send to that mission would be most intelligent and perfectly trained. 

But if the journey would take hundreds or thousands of years, the colonialists would be born children, who have not even seen or hear Earth. And that would make social pressures to the relationship between Earth and it's hypothetical civilizations, but the problem is that those civilizations would turn aliens to Earth on together. And the thing is that maybe Earth would not in those visions be the number one, and it would turn to one of the colonies, or in the worst visions worse than average colonies.

The thing is that those highly intelligent persons could start to manipulate their abilities, and that means that they might turn to very highly intelligent, and also they can adapt themselves to new environments. And those environments could be different kind of places than Earth. Those colonies might start to send their colonialists to other planets, and they would not even tell that thing to Earth.

And why they should do that thing? Those hypothetical colonies might communicate with Earth from hundreds of light-years. That thing might take too long for communication. Then the colony would start to live it's own life away from the Earth.

When I wrote this text one thing brought to my head. And that thing is why when youngsters would write things like this, they are using their imaginations. But when elder people are thinking and writing this kind of things, they are making theories.

This is a thing, what makes me sometimes think, how many good writers could have lost because people attitude is that they are childish. When we are thinking about novels and writings, what are created by some writer, we can say, that many of them are still a theory. But why only elder people are making theories? This is a very interesting question. And sometimes people would think that the people who will write about their thoughts are some kind of autistic. That thing is a really interesting way to think.

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

When people are telling their opinions publically, the real opinion of that person might be different than they think in their mind, and that will be explained that we all have will to please the bosses and great audience. That means that we sometimes are talking things, what other people want to hear. Or otherwise, because of respect, we will let people have their wrong opinions or pseudoscientific arguments because we want to please them, and that's why we let them say things, what is wrong or even dangerous.

We The problems with metering are that some people are using different kind of tools than others and in those kinds of cases, the problem is how to make people understand, that something that they cannot see might be true anyway. Many times those people have made a long career in some respected areas. And that would make a little bit difficult to say against them.

Let's take one example of the things, where many people just believe something, but the research has shown things being a little bit different than people expect. That case is bitumen, the real thing is that this material is the most stiffed liquid in the world. That thing has been proven by putting a piece of bitumen in the funnel, and during tens of years, those bites just flew down the funnel.

The thing is meanless in normal life, but cases, when somebody will repair the vacuum tanks and space stations, would that thing be in the vital role. If the place what would be used to repair the hole would be sucked to the vacuum, the results would be devastating.

Respect is bad for research. And good researcher should respect nobody.

When somebody is collecting the statistics and asks people opinion of some questions, there have ever discussed things like the majority of the population might not have opinions at all, what consists some question. But they give answers anyway. And in some cases, people don't even listen to questions what the Gallup poll maker asks.

And in some cases, they would give the name of the politician, who has become in their mind. Or what would you think about the situation, that some bodybuilder with the political police branch will come to ask the opinion about the state leader's policy? In this case, the wise man will say "yes", because in that case, the wrong answer will cause a bad result.

And there are always people who, have 20 years of experience of something, but their roll meter would not meter something, and that makes things wrong. In the science metering, something would be happening by using special equipment, and those lasers and other things will give results, what are the size of a micrometer. In that case, respect would sometimes cause that nobody fixes the answer.

What could be the thing, what somebody doesn't want us to know about plant intelligence? (Part II)

What could be the thing, what somebody doesn't want us to know about plant intelligence? (Part II)

Sometimes things, what first seem meaningless, would be very important, when we are thinking something, what might involve deep and important meaning. What could be the thing, what somebody doesn't want us to know about plant intelligence? And the answer could be very interesting if we would notice, that there would be something, what is a connection to the biotechnology.

The plant intelligence seems to have a connection to the cells, what is taking the most part of oxygen, what the vegetables are producing. There is a possibility, that if those cells are some kind of para- or a protoneuron and those cells have proto-neural functions those cells are really interesting in the point of view of the biotechnology.

What if we would someday benefit the proto neurons of vegetables for communication with vegetables?

One of the most fascinating ideas is that if in the human body would surgically be implanted those proto neurons, that cell would allow a person to communicate with vegetables. The communication would happen by using pheromones, and this thing would open new visions for mankind and research.

That thing would need, of course, that neurons would have the ability to communicate with those cells, and those cells would have the ability to create those communication pheromones, and this would cause many interesting ideas in the mind of researchers and ordinary people. And those things would be very difficult questions in the point of view of the ethics, but it would be a fascinating idea, that people could someday communicate straight with species, what is totally different what we are. That would open the new points of view in the mind of humans, and also makes that we would reestimate our relationship with nature and other species.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLhgtqd1M2g

A new type of protective suits are claimed to inspired by the UFO-sightings

A new type of protective suits are claimed to inspired by the UFO-sightings

The new type of protecting suits are created by inspired by the UFO-cases. Those new kinds of protective suits are far more advanced than some HULC-exoskeleton, and they are also based on so-called active technology, where the hydraulic parts of the HULC are replaced by using the artificial muscle and skin cells.

There is a possibility to use the silicone-based "bags", which is filled with electrolytic liquid, which would react to the electricity. That means that at both sides of this bag is the electric wire, what would make the electrolytic liquid move in the bag. And that makes the bag acting like real muscle cells.

Nanotechnology gives the possibility to create different types of structures, and one of them is the spring, what is pulling together, when the electricity is connected to it. So there are many ways to make those "active silicone muscles", and maybe in the future, we might have the possibility to get the silicone muscles, which will give us more strength.

What if there is a possibility to use living cells in that kind of things?

But the most fascinating idea of those protective suits would be using the living tissues. This kind of ideas to make those suits by using living cells would revolutionize the design of protective suits and other technology. In this kind of solutions, the inner and outer layers of the suit would be mylar, where is the gold powder, and that makes this layer insulator against the radiation and chemical components.

That kind of biomechanic protective suit can fix itself if there is damage, and the living tissues allow to use of natural nutrient for those systems. The thing is that the muscle cells are connected to the human nervous system by using multiple EEG-sensors, what is controlling extreme thin electric wires, what is connected to the muscle cells. This kind of systems would allow creating a new type of protective equipment.

Computers as the equipment of the research

Computers as the equipment of the research

1. The role of computers grows all the time

The role of computers is getting bigger and bigger all the time. Traditionally the mathematicians, physics and protein engineers have used the powerful calculating capacity of the computers, but also other scientists like sociologists, linguistics, and behavioral scientists have found the capacity of computers and artificial intelligence to create and assist the researchers.

The computers are ultimate tools when they must compile the databases and the thing what makes computers very effective tool is that they are handling all data as the numbers. When we are thinking things like photograph compile, the computers can handle the images the same way as the databases.

2. Computers and artificial intelligence would be the ultimate tool for sorting data

The algorithms can compare two image files as the numeral forms, which means that the systems would open the file to the series of zero and one, what is the form of the ASCII-code. Then they have compared the files by number to number to find the similarities and differences.

The system is so sharp, that it detects any difference between files, and it can find if the paper is printed by a certain printer or printer patron. That is because there are little differences in the form of the nozzles of every patron. Because the position of the instruments is not actually always the same, and the tools, what are making those forms are always spent. This makes microscopic differences in the form of those nozzles.

This is the way, how the image lock of the computer is working. But the computers are an effective tool when the normal documents and other files. They can form every file in the world of computers to a series of zeros and ones, and this process is normally done in the microprocessors.

3.  Nothing can hide algorithm

When the file is transformed into the binary form, it can compare very easily to other files and the system can find every similarity between those files. That makes impossible to transport classified information out of the building by changing the terminal of the file.

But the ability to compare sharply and fast the files together makes possible to compare the voices of the speakers together. And because the comparing happens with the binary form of data, the person can identify almost 100%.

That happens when the program isolates the bytes, what are involving data of the type like the melody of the sound, and this means that the system would detect if there are two files, where is the same person who talks. The system can isolate also the words, and make the sound compartment what is really sharp.

The aerogel, lightest material on Earth

The aerogel, lightest material on Earth

1. There could be many uses for the aerogel

Aerogel is material, which is mostly air. That makes it extremely lightweight, and that makes it addictive material for extremely high buildings. The thing that aerogel would be very light allows making very lightweight structures, and if this material would be like some urethane, it would be easy to transport to the building site.

The lightweight material, what is shaped like Lego bricks are easy to handle. Only one or two men can assembly even big structures, and then those layers can be painted that people don't see inside the house.

2. Aerogel bites can be shaped like Lego-bricks

Then the workers must just cast that material in the form, which allows making customized particles for the structure. The thing, what makes aerogel interesting is that material would let the air go through it, and this allows to make structures, where is always enough air.

But the aerogel can also form in bites, what looks like Lego bricks, and that allows to make structures, which can construct on the place, and then remove after the use. That would be a suitable thing in temporary buildings like some festivals and other happenings like evacuation centers.

3. Aerogel can be used in the heat shields and self-extinguishing materials

The aerogel can also be used in the heat shields of the spacecraft. That structure isolates the surface very effectively from the heat, and this makes it very effective in that kind of things, where is needed effective and lightweight thermo-protection. And if the aerogel bricks are packed in the bags, what is filled with carbon dioxide, that material would be used in structures, what will extinguish themselves.

An idea is that if the bag would burn broken, the carbon dioxide would lead to the fire. Or when the aerogel is casting, the process can make in the carbon dioxide, and then the brick would be covered by the isolating latex, what keeps the carbon dioxide in the material.

4. Aerogel can be used for bulletproof vests and military vehicles extra-armor

The cellular structure of aerogel makes it really interesting material because hollows in the structure make it elastic, and that would cause that this material would endure strikes. Because it is lightweight and breathing, it is suitable material for the bulletproof vests, and this makes them interesting also for military use.

But also tanks and other things can cover or even made by using this material. The lightweight form makes possible to put extra-armor on the outer layer of military vehicles, which increases their survivability against anti-tank weapons. Some of those aerogels are biodegradable, which makes them ecological solutions. There are many films on the Internet about this material, so you can see them on YouTube.

The talking about abortion is going hot again

The talking about abortion is going hot again

Abortion laws are a complicated thing


When we are talking about the laws of abortion, we are facing things like women right, and their own will. But at the same time, we are talking about a thing, what can be made only to women. Men cannot become pregnant, and that makes this thing very difficult. The thing what makes people concern about abortion is that in the world of modern genetics, we are facing the thing that fetuses are produced by cloning for the stem cell research, and there is a possibility that those fetuses are used also for the infertility treatment, what makes this thing even more complicated.


Wealthy people can always travel to a foreign country and take abortion, but otherwise, in the case of free abortion, the parents can force underage girl to take that thing. So there are two sides to this thing, which is also a very big business for travel agencies and genetic industries. Those actors want tight abortion laws because of that kind of things are good for their business.

Cloning allows creating stem cells for every person on this planet

When the researchers created the method, how to change the DNA inside the cell, they created the method, how to produce the stem cells for every person in the world. The method is that conceived ovum just put under the microscope, and then the DNA would be sucked away. For creating the fetuses for the stem cell research the researchers need only the testicles for producing the sperm cells, and the egg cells for producing the fetuses. And after that, the embryos would just separate, what is actually cloning those things.

And then the replacement DNA would inject in the nucleus. In that case, is the moral question, what if some of those fetuses or whatever we want to call those cell-level things would use also for the infertility treatment. Here I must ask one question, would you want to tell that person about this kind of things. When we are facing the legislation, we can say that there are many ways to circle every national law in the world. The thing is that going to a foreign country is enough in those cases, where somebody wants to make something, what is against the law.

Abortion is business 

When we are talking about abortion as the business, that is a very good business for some travel agencies, what sells so-called abortion trips to some other country, where is easy to get an abortion. And the thing is that the cells of those fetuses are claimed to sold in the stem cell research. This thing makes that kind of legislation very complicated thing. The rich people have money to buy trips to countries, where abortion is legal, and that's it. In this model, the abortion is reserved only to wealthy people, who have money to buy those trips.

But poor people would not have money for those trips. And there is one thing, what is forgotten. If in some places like Far-East the boy would get silicone implants in some clinic immediately, if he wants to work as a prostitute, and this thing is legal, what happens in the back offices of those clinics. If the boy is 15 years old and comes to get the implants, that thing would probably be not his own will. And this kind of things is against the moral of medicine.

The thoughts about the UFOs and the technology, what is behind them

The thoughts about the UFOs and the technology, what is behind them


Could the UFO be some psychic phenomenon?

The reason why some researchers and intelligence services are interesting about the UFOs is that those things can use in the base for the innovation, which would give benefit for the technical advantages. And also the things, what are called UFO sightings can give data, what can use the creation of the extraordinary flying machines, which could also dive in the oceans.

That thing would allow thinking that could the UFO be some kind of psychic phenomenon. In that case, the sighting of the UFO could cause some kind of electric eruption in the nervous system, and in that case, the UFO could be some kind hallucination what would be the vision, what is similar with the thing, what some artists get, when they are creating their innovation, and some of those visions could probably breed to the merchandise.

What would you do with a flying saucer? 

Here I'm going to write the little tale, why the UFOs are so interesting, are they coming from the other solar systems or from some secret airfield in some desert. In one day somebody asked me, what I will do with the saucer-shaped spacecraft. And then somebody created the idea, that those saucer-shaped spacecraft can be put in the row.

If those saucers would have the hole in the middle of them, those spacecraft would use it as the WARP-drive. In fact, the WARP-drive can installed in the outer layer of the spacecraft, and if the saucer-shaped thing looks like a clam, in the furrows of the clam would be installed the magnet tracks. And those tracks would allow that space to move any direction, what the controller wants.  If the voltage of those systems would be high enough, the heavier than air vehicle can operate also in the atmosphere.

But if the metal piece would fly through the line of those magnetic accelerators, those UFOs can form the particle accelerator, what will increase the speed of that bite even in the near of the speed of light, and that kind of things could be very devastating if they hit to some planet. Here I don't editorialize, are the UFOs coming from the secret military base from Groom Lake area, or does they come from somewhere from the place, what is called Zeta Reticuli.

The cultural differences between human and humanoids would be huge. 

If we would face the real UFO from some other star system, we might face the thing, what we ever can imagine. If the creators of that thing would come from another star system, their culture would be very different than our own. That means that their technical solutions might look very interesting, and the way how those aliens would think might be a little bit different than a human way to think.

The thing is that those hypothetical humanoids would have more sophisticated technology than we can ever think. That means that the system of those UFOs would seem empty, but there is a possibility, that those humanoids would control them by using EEG waves, and in that case in the UFO would be the beds, where those spacemen would lay.

And they could connect their brains straight with the commanding computer of that UFO. In that case, the computer would be installed in the structures of the spacecraft. Or those creatures, what we think as the crew would be some kind of robots, what mission is to take samples from the area around that spacecraft. Those robots might have clothes, which denies the bacteria and viruses transfer inside the spacecraft. That means those things might be more fascinating than we ever can imagine.

The danger would be that this system would use an artificial black hole or singularity as the motor system, and maybe that kind of system would be more sophisticated than any WARP, and in fact, those artificial black holes would be used to create the fusion power to that thing. If that singularity will be released from its ball, that thing can cause the fusion in the atmosphere.

The origin of UFOs can be also in some secret military base

That kind of thing can risk the entire life on earth. If the creators of that hypothetical spacecraft would have the ability to create a singularity, they could use the systems of that spacecraft by using the remote control, and that hypothesis makes those UFOs more dangerous than we could ever expect. The singularity would allow the controller to see everything and send the control signals to the spacecraft from the huge distance.

At this point, we must say that the origin of the UFOs can be at some other star systems, but they can also be created by the man. The thing is that the mission of those spacecraft would be to crash, because of those hypothetical humanoids would know that the life form on this planet is intelligent. That's why they would give one of their crafts to us because they would want to collect the information from our nervous system by using the hidden instruments.

The thing is that those humanoids, which means the creators of the craft, would expect that humans would take the craft to the most secured airbase, and the top men would research that wreck. That means the alien would collect the information from those scientists and engineers. Those UFOs can also be used as the trap, which will capture the persons, who go inside it and then just fly away. This kind of things are the things, what we should think when we are going to bed, and ask, why that kind of things are so big secrets?