Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser (1812-1833) was one of the most mysterious cases in the history of Europe. He came from nowhere to Nuremberg at the age of 16. When we are looking at the sources, the birthday has sometimes claimed to be 28 or maybe 30 April or 29 September 1812 and where those days have been found is not mentioned. I have written many times about this boy, who came from nowhere and faced his fate at the age of 21 by the hand of an assassin, whoever captured. The mysterious case began, when the young boy walked to the military barrack and gave the letter, what is claimed to write by his mother. There is a couple of source after this text, and you might check those persons names from those links. 

He could only say the words "I want to become an officer like my father" and then the word "horse", what he. repeated twice, or this is how that thing has been documented. There are many documents on the internet, and that's why I don't start to write about the story, what you can read from the net, but here I must ask one question, what is seen by the face of that boy.

The question is Kaspar Hauser one member of the family of Napoleon Bonaparte?

It is suspected that Kaspar Hauser lived in one single room in the early years of his life. That boy was mentally normal, which means that there was some kind of very important reason, why he was kept in the locked room. But there are a couple of remarkable things that people who have investigated this case have been noticed and the first one was that Kaspar had very soft feet. And the second one was that he walked like a drunk, which meant that he might have a problem with direction instinct, or he was drunk but the alcohol can be given him with injection straight to the blood. Was this injection mean lethal or was it given to confess the guards, that the boy was dead? And if that thing is true, some of the people, who were near him might be that person who took him near Nurenberg.

That thing is causing suspicious that somebody might have tried to kill that boy on that day when he arrived in the city of Nuremberg 26th April 1828. Maybe the murderer has given too little alcohol, and Kaspar survived in that attempt. Maybe the killer has given alcohol and then left the unconscious boy to die. The thing, that makes this case so interesting is that nobody seems to see, where that boy came. The soft feet gave a very weak hint about the conditions, where he was kept. The thing is that he was kept on the soft floor, and in the room, what was tall enough that Kaspar could stand.

 And because he could walk, somebody had given him a model that he could learn that skill. Or in some bad jokes is claimed that Kaspar Hauser has been in the space station, because of zero gravity conditions are making balance very bad. And that kind of thing will explain the teetering walk. And maybe that thing would offer a very good topic for some novel, where Kaspar Hauser has been trapped in Solar Warden. But let's continue more seriously. When we are thinking about the end of that boy, we must realize that after the first strike, where he got the scar on his forehead, that thing might be made also by the woman. 

The weapon was the meat knife, what looked like an ax, and that would mean that killer acted in panic. That means that this person might think that Kaspar could recognize the attacker. And when the attacks were made, that boy must be taken to another city and protected better. The second attack that was faithful lets many questions open. The injuries, what that boy got were not killed immediately. So is it possible that those attacks were made for setting up that person dead, and maybe somebody changed the identity of that young man?

Lord Stanhope had that kind of relationship that this kind of thing can be done. And did Stanhope knew something, what other people didn't know? He was a very high-rank member of the British government, and that means that this kind of person would not walk anywhere without a good reason. 

And that tells that the killer has not skills to make that thing. There is a theory that Kaspar was a member of some royal family. If that thing was fake, the people who were behind that kind of case were behind those attacks they might not want to kill that boy. The acted murder attempts would make the story more effective and convincing but then the attacker just made a mistake. The question is how much Kaspar knew about the stories, that he was a member of some royal family? But those violate actions make his story famous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Hauser

https://www.edubloxtutor.com/kaspar-hauser/

Upper Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Hauser_Kreul.jpg

Downer Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Kaspar_hauser.jpg/250px-Kaspar_hauser.jpg

The technical version of "bad eye".

The technical version of "bad eye".

When we are thinking about the physic powers and the scientific- or technical solution for that thing, we might think that there is a theoretical possibility, that between human brains would be installed the magnetic system or radio transmitter, which could focus the neural electricity for the target.  We can imagine, what that kind of system or device would look like, and that kind of bizarre solution might be tested by some alchemists or some other people.

The system itself would be the U-shaped silver or golden channel, where would be the pike, which will point to ahead, and that small pike would send the neural electricity of the pineal gland through that structure. That thing would make that the neural electricity would be targeted to the target, and while it goes through the channel, it would get stronger. But as you see, the use or existing of this kind of system is not ever mentioned and there is not any proves about that kind of thing.

When we are thinking about the possibility to use that kind of system to take other people under the control, we must realize that the possibility, that the targeted radio signals would start to oscillate the nervous system. And if the power of that electricity is higher than the nerves own electricity, that thing allows controlling other people by using own thoughts on that purpose.

But that kind of system would need the surgery for installing that device. So could some ancient priest made cross-looking cuts to the head of those selected persons, and then made some kind of experiments with that thing. Or were those makers perhaps the humanoids. And remember that this text is only theory.

And if it is connected to the plutonium batteries it would use an active amplifier system. The thing is that that equipment would give the possibility to make telekinesis possible. In this case, the telekinesis would work only between humans or living organisms, but that kind of thing would be only the imaginational visions of the technology, which is extraordinary.

I took the idea of this thing from the old tales, where the head of the king was oiled in a long time ago. In my imagination, I created the idea that could it possible that this ritual of oiling the head would be made because of some surgical operation? And if that thing would be true, would there be implanted some kind of system, what will make some people think faster or were there some more sophisticated things in the brains.

So if there would put the golden plate between brains, that thing would allow that the electricity would travel faster between brain sides. But as we know what kind of thoughts are only the hypothesis, and even if those kinds of things would be made in the past, that doesn't mean that the patient stayed alive after the operation. If we think that some ancient priests put the gold plates between brains of their victims for making those people think "golden thoughts". That is one way to see things.

Philosophers, social life and machines

Philosophers, social life and machines

When some philosophers are talking about machines, they are not meaning that those machines are machines. They are simply mean things. When they are talking about tune in the machine, they are meaning that the tuning of life or service has the same effect than tuning in the machine. If the machine would put too much tuning parts that means that it would be destroyed and things are starting to travel too fast, and then the results could be devastating.

This means that if things like a business would be boosted too much, the drive turns too hard. And then there would be problems with the time, that the person has no time to make things properly, and that would cause the problems. In the worst cases, the reputation of the company is lost, and that is a really bad thing for business.

So the other times when philosophers are meaning something else, what they are spoken in the times when they are talking about hard particles. If we are thinking about the planet, what is full of solid rock that means that the planet would be a very tough particle.

But if something would impact it, the damages would be indelible. That particle needs the magma for fixing damages, and if the planet, what is made by solid stone would hit the meteorite it would crush, and nothing fixes the errors. The particle needs soft material for fixing damages in the core. And that thing is visible also in the social relations at private and public life in working and leisure.

If we would kick people out when they are saying something negative nobody dares to tell us if there is something wrong in the field. That means if we cannot listen, henchmen, that they have no time to make their work, or there are no skills or tools that would cause problems. And one of the best ways to isolate self from the truth is just kicking people off if they are giving the information, what is not pleasing us. The same thing is suitable in every relationship. If we would yell the other people and be always tough and probably violent, we must face thing, that we are losing our relationships.

This is the thing about tough things. If we would be too tough there is no chance to fix things. If we are wrong, we can still face our faces in two ways. Another is that we would start to blame every other person in the world, and yell that "we cannot give you even the simplest works to do". And that means that the fault would be made by the henchmen.

And in the best situation is that if the henchman would be some "summer Goofy", who would not continue in that place anymore. Maybe other people understand that the boss would not have time to select the proper workers for holidays, and this might save the reputation of the boss. But the thing is that the boss would have the responsibility to follow the work in the field.

 Maybe somebody would believe that some summer worker makes a bad job, but what if this happens simultaneously. What if the everyday thing is that the yards are full of garbage? Are those things the fault of some summer worker, or would there something in the workplace, that the bosses are always choosing the wrong workers.

A short tale about benzene molecule

A short tale about benzene molecule

Dreams are things that are meant to protect people and also their mission is to handle the things, what is happened during the daylight. The scientific interest in the dreams began when the finder of the structure of benzene molecule, Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz (1829-1896) claimed to see that structure in the dreams, or he claimed to saw the snakes what rise from the flames, and then those snakes bit their narrow tail, and then von Stradonitz realize that the structure of the benzene molecule was ring.

This tale is mentioned in many books, and that influenced Sigmund Freud when he started to create his psychoanalysis. That tool was expected to allow access to people's memories of dreams, and the problem in the dreams is that the memory is connected off while a person sees dreams. And this thing is a shame because people are most creative while sleeping and during dreams, the entire brain capacity can be used for creative work.

This story about the invention of the form of the benzene molecule is one of the most remarkable innovators for dream research. Actually, after birth his name was Kekulé, but then he took the annex von Stradonitz in his name. This remarkable chemist died in the year 1896, and that means that he didn't have electron microscopes, and just modern observation tools like a laser- and electron microscopes have confirmed that structure.

The thing is that this story is really interesting because von Stradonitz couldn't see that structure, and how that man could understand or proven that aromatic hydrocarbons like benzene are extremely dangerous? Or how that man proved this thing. In modern laboratories laser microscopes, what can send the very short wave radiation by using extreme sharp frequency can see the structure of molecules and atoms.

Those objects need extremely sharp systems, which would scan surfaces with the very big resolution, and in those systems is used many types of radiation, and they are hybrid tools, what is created by connecting the laser- and electron microscopes. Modern high-tech systems can scan the surfaces with very high definition, and the difference between laser- and electron microscopes is that the first one uses neutral particles, photons what are not influencing the atoms and ions.

Electron microscopes problem in the laboratory work is that the system uses particles, what have the electric capacity. And that thing might influence the electron layers and combinations between atoms in the molecules. The thing in the benzene molecule is that this chemical combination causes cancer. And that thing was not proven in the time of von Stradonitz. During his lifetime cancer caused death penalty automatically.

When we are thinking the benzene molecule, and it's the ability to cause cancer, we must realize one thing. In our lifetime the benzene molecule is a very well known thing, and the reason why it causes cancer is also very well known. The reason is that benzene would damage the genomes of the cells, and that thing makes it extremely dangerous to handle. But why von Stradonitz saw the snakes in the flames? Did he saw some kind of weapon in that material?

When we are thinking about the name of that chemistry, we must notice that von is the part of the name, what shows that Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz was a military officer. So was he work for the German military? This kind of questions is really interesting.

Learning to think is a difficult process

Learning to think is a difficult process

Problems with thinking are that people believe, that they should not practice or learn thinking. In some cases, people think that thinking is a skill, which is stable during all life. But the thing is that our image of the world is changing, and also when we would become older, and get more life experience, we would find another aspect from the very well known things.

Also, the way to get information is changing, and that thing would change our way to think about things. Life experience and mass media like the internet are telling things, what we ever imagined to become public. That thing what the Internet has been bringing in our mind is that there could be false information, what would be used to reach political goals. But the thing is that the biggest problem with the human race is that we are reading texts and look at the new, which feels comfortable for us.

That means that we should find also other ways to see things than just what is supporting our way of think. And another problem is that we let other people think for us. If we don't use criticism that news, what is meant for supporting the political or some other agenda are more effective than they even should be. There is sometimes seen the phenomenon, that everything that is supporting our political agenda should allow, and other opinions should not even be written, because they are disturbing our visions or opinions. in the media and other discussions is one thing, what people have forgotten when they are writing stories about things like military power.

That thing is that every nation uses it's landscape as they or their leaders want. That is the thing in the law. It is made by somebody for protecting something. But even if the law justifies something, we might not like that thing. Like the law is a different thing than follow the law. We are following speed limits because the punishment would be harder than what we might get to follow the limits, and being at destiny a little bit later. This is the reason, why we are following the law.

Also writing and speaking against law and agitating people to act against the law is dangerous because we might get prosecutions about those opinions, and here I mean that the lawbook doesn't think for us. But still, we follow the law without excuses. Or at least we would not show those excuses in public by driving with very high speed against traffic rules, or I hope that nobody does those things.

That would seem a very unusual problem, because of the intelligent people are sometimes put on the stand, and people believe, that everything, what they say is always well thought and argument thing, what might be only the delusion. Even the persons, who have the highest grade of intelligence must think all sides of the things, what they are going to say.

And when we are comparing the everyday way to think about things to the philosophical way to think about things, the last one is the deeper and takes longer time than the regular way to think about things. This is the thing, what we always forget. If we would practice the philosophical or deeper way to think in supermarkets, we would become a little bit, arduous people. When we have invented things, we must realize that every single invention has two sides, and they can be used in good or bad things.

Learning of thinking consist of a neutral way to think. The neutral way to think means that there might be something, what we don't like or what is against our moral and ethic point of the view. But we must not always show great emotions for those things. If we think about rock music, we must realize that even if we would not like the fans way wear their clothes of even rock music, we don't need to show great emotions for that kind of things.

The thing that somebody listens to rock music doesn't mean that those people would give them votes in the election campaigns. And if we would be at that concert we have not had to get angry about things, what we cannot see. While thinking about this kind of questions, we are sometimes meet persons who are asking, should we think this way about things like pollution and human rights. Here I must repeat myself and say, that there is little difference between a rock concert and human rights.

One of the worst visions in people's mind is the state, what convicts the breaking the human right in the lawbook but allows those things in real life. That means that biting a person on a cell might be prohibited, but those things would not ever prosecute.

This means that authorities have the right to do what they want to do. The biggest problems with human rights are civil wars, which are caused because of the corrupted government, which breaks human rights. In those cases also guerrillas would act against human rights and international law. International law is problematic in those cases because there is no mention, what is the legal government?

The thing is that international law mentions that guerrilla is criminal, what can shot immediately after capturing. And the thing is that in international law is mentioned that every state has a right to use every kind of weapons in police actions. So in antiguerrilla operations is legal to use even chemical weapons what are inhumane weapons. And then another problem with international law is that it doesn't mention or determine, how the government should come to power. There is forgetting one thing, and that is that nations are confessing nations and states not governments.

And that legitimizes also use of guerrillas or military forces to take the rule in the nation. The thing that the leaders of the state must not even get a single vote in the elections is also one of the problems in international law. But the law is the law, and there is no determination even the length of the season of the presidency. That allows the president to sit on the office even all the life, and there is no determination either the age of the president. Those things are really interesting topics for discussions about thinking.

How artificial intelligence can help to research the ultimate objects at the universe.

How artificial intelligence can help to research the ultimate objects at the universe.

The thing is that artificial intelligence is an ultimate tool for many things, and one is to search the extreme objects of the universe. When we are thinking about this system, where algorithms are looking for things from the giant black holes and distant planets. The algorithm can follow every change, what happens in the extreme targets, and even the man would not notice something, the algorithm can search and report the smallest changes of the symmetry of the object, and also the minimum changes in brightness and the form of an object can be reported.

This makes artificial intelligence so powerful tool in the cases, where it must find something, what is very small and that thing would let researchers make other things, then keep some statistics about changes of the brightness or the direction of the eruption or jettisons. The system can register those changes, which might be only the one-tenth part of degrees. And that thing would give very interesting data about how black holes are acting together, and what kind of influence they have to each other.

But artificial intelligence can do many other things and the thing to separate even the smallest details would make it the ultimate tool for the people, who are promoting the rock concerts and another kind of happenings. The artificial intelligence can, of course, locate the dangerous persons from the audience. 

That happens by storing every detail of the person behavior, who have acted dangerously, and the idea is that artificial intelligence can compare the gesture of the people to the gesture, what is found from the database. And the idea is that the things can be stuck to before somebody goes too far. But artificial intelligence can also mark persons, who seem nervous and bring those situations to the screen of the observers.

But artificial intelligence can also search the faces of the people, and see are they really glad. And that thing tells if people are enjoying the show. That system can also search for people, who seem unhappy because those people might have serious reasons for that kind of behavior. Also, the system can search for things like different clothes from the audience. If some person would be dressed to suit and slips in a rock concert, that thing can be very interesting. 

Artificial intelligence can also locate vests of a motorcycle gang, and it can locate people, who are talking with that kind of people. But the thing is that the system can work many ways sophisticated than some analog system. That means that the system might keep a couple of seconds pause, even if the personnel is just watching real-time camera images without the need to record those things.

That means that if somebody punches other persons, or in the worst case the bomb is exploding, the system can notice the details, that something happens. Then it can save the record of the case to a special file, and send it straight to police. It can also locate the exploded bag or the person, who has put the hand to fist.

And it would locate every slap, and thing what people are doing. It can also locate persons, who might have drugs in blood, and also cases where somebody is throwing drinks to other people. The system is that artificial intelligence notices if something flies in the air, and then the system would target cameras to that point.

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.

And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.

When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.

Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that. 

Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?

When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants and termites, what also are ants are interesting characters. Those social, wingless bugs are defending their base with a very big attitude, and some of them even die, when they are defending their queen and home. One of the most interesting characters in that community, where everybody would put their stakes to the work of the day is military ants.

Military- or soldier ants are the very aggressive version of ants, and their mission is to defend others. But how those ants would control those soldiers? Their jaws are terrifying and attitude is deadly, but why they are not attacking the workers? That is because the worker would feed that terrifying member of the community.

If the soldier ant would be aggressive, there would be the situation, that another worker comes to the place, and then those ants would relax that horrifying defender of the community. They are telling that everything is fine, and nobody would not threaten the position of that specific ant. And then those worker ants would give a small bite of sugar to the warrior.

That keeps soldier ant satisfied, and there is one little thing about that soldier ant, what protects the entire community. They cannot eat themselves, and those ants are not using their jaws to anything else than just fighting. Military ants cannot even eat, because in their stomach is not bacteria, what is necessary for eating, or transformation of the food to nutrient.

Ants are given an idea to nanomachines, what his group of robots, what are operating like one giant robot. This kind of robot can lose one part of it, and it can still operate. That poly- or swarm robot would also be more flexible than any other device in human history.

But the ants have given ideas of the society, where everybody has their place, and one of those workers, who would work in that futuristic society is the data worker, who would sit in the space station and control the drones and other devices on the Earth. In this hypothetical scenario, those data workers cannot escape or rebel, because they are addicted to the nutrient, what will bring from Earth.

When we are thinking about evolution, the ants have learned the communal working. In their society, every single ant has own duty. And if the duty is defending the society, those bugs would not do anything else.

In the next part, the world "future" can be replaced by the world "other civilization". What we will do and what we are looking in the distant future is a mystery, and without time machine we cannot find that out, how our decadents would live thousands of years after us. The evolution of ants has given the idea that maybe the future would bring to the world the real-life information workers, who are operating in the giant orbiting space station.

Those space stations would need the food from Earth, and that thing would keep them under the control. And those workers would operate the drones and robots on Earth. The thing is that if those controllers connection with robots must be cut, the thing, what the people on Earth must do is just jam the communication lines. If those operators would spend all of their life in the space station, their bones and muscles would be so weak, that those inmates would be dead, if they land to the Earth.

And in one scenario those characters would not have even consoles, and their brains are connected to the computers by using surgically installed microchips. They would also offer their brain capacity to solve problems, and if there would be a problem, the operator, who sits on Eart can just cut the connection of the microchip. The idea is that in those space stations would live people, whose brains can be connected, and that will gove those systems extremely high level of intelligence and ability to solve problems.

Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?

Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?

One thing, what must be realized with social media, what you see in the western world might not the same, what they are in Russia. This is the thing, what have many times told in the western media, but the thing what has put less focus in media is that also Russian homepages can change by western actors. This means that the social media used by Russians in Russia might be different in the western world. That thing is very easy to make, and the system is very simple in theory.

That social media and the data, what users input in that system would search by algorithms, and then the artificial intelligence just removes things, what is not tolerated. The thing is that the server transforms the data to another homepage, which is similar to the real homepage.  the reason, why western military intelligence is concerning about the Russian social media, is that the intelligence services are using those platforms to keep in touch with contacts.

The new way to operate in Russian intelligence and security is that those organizations are operated by using oligarchs for buying the real estates and establishing the companies, what the intelligence can use in its operations. I just read the article in Helsingin Sanomat (21.7.2019) what told about the journalist, who has been uncovered corruption and other things about Russian security services, and I noticed about the name in that article.

That name was Yevgeny Prigodzhin. That man worked as the gang member for some Russian businessmen and was in jail for getting under-age girls for prostitutes, betrayals and robberies.

Those things were mentioned in the article, and when we are thinking about the past of Pridgodzhin, that would make that man the perfect tool for the hands of intelligence. Those kind of people are suitable for open the bank accounts and establish companies for covert operations, like buying real-estates for storing the equipment and housing the operatives, who cannot use regular hotels.

And the thing is, that if that actor would someday start to be the problem, that means that there would be found some overdose or something like that in the past, and then the police can arrest that man. Of course, the prosecutions would be something like tax avoidance, but if the person would not cooperate there would be find something worse in history.

When we are looking at the way, how intelligence service operates, there would be no person in service, who they cannot control. That means that the oligarch, who would operate with Intelligence is under the control of those agents, who would play the bodyguards of that person. And that means that the person is imprisoned in own office.

Some little details about black holes and the event horizon

Some little details about black holes and the event horizon

Because we cannot see black holes, we cannot say that we know things, what is happening in that particle. The end of our ability to make observations is the event horizon, and after that everything, what we see is theory. Black holes are the tightest objects in the Universe, and that is what we know about that strange particle.

The Event horizon

The last time, when we see the object before it falls in the black hole is when it touches the event horizon. In that point, the speed of the dropping object would be the speed of light, and this means that the time would stop in the particle. And what is behind that point, what is called "Event horizon", is only theory, and we cannot know if the black hole would touch the event horizon, or is there some space, where the fallen object can travel to the center of black hole, because we cannot get observations from another side.

The thing what we would see, when we are dropping in a black hole is a mystery. We might feel that everything would be stopped and after that, we cannot imagine, what the world inside the event horizon would look like. Because time stops at the point of the Event horizon, we would feel, that we would be in that point forever, and actually, we don't know are we elding during that moment, what takes forever. But that is the thing, what we can think about.

When we are talking about black holes, we are talking about points or objects, where information disappears. That means that the information, what goes in the black hole would not come out, or we cannot see that information anymore. There is sometimes claimed, that the black hole would destroy material, and that is not true in the physical meaning. 

If we would think that in the Earth atmosphere would forming the tennis-ball-sized stable black hole the thing would be, that this object would crush the form of the material. But the physical form of the material remains, but the entire planet would be crushed, when it would be pulled in the black hole. The molecules would be destroyed by the tidal forces, and that means that the molecular form of the material would be destroyed.

But atoms would remain. If the black hole would be supermassive, it can suck entire solar systems in it. There have been theories that the black holes might have solar systems, and the thing is that the transform disk around that object would give energy in a similar way as the regular star. And if the planet would orbit at enough big distance it would have lifeforms, but the X-ray radiation of the black hole would be very powerful, and that means the species must be more protected against that radiation than we are. But theories are an interesting thing.

Exotic engines and man-made UFOs

Exotic engines and man-made UFOs

The problems with exotic engine solutions are that they need very high-voltage electricity for operating and in the aircraft or another kind of systems the problem is to get device airborne. If the device could rise from the ground, that means the system can use quite little energy for the horizontal movements, but as I said before the problem is lifting the craft from the ground, and after that, the thing would be easy to maneuver.

Of course, we have made the large-size airborne vehicles a long time. Airships are lighter than air solutions, but the problem of those vehicles is that they have poor maneuverability. If the single ammunition from the aircraft cannon hits those vehicles, they can be destroyed.

If we would want to make the heavier than air vehicle, what is the size of the Typhoon-class submarine, the thing would be easy to do by replacing the missile tubes with turbines, what would rise that device above the Earth, but that kind of systems need extreme lots of fuel. And the easier solution would use normal fans, and nuclear reactors for rising that vehicle airborne, but that would be too risky to make in real life.

If we think things like UFO:s and their connection to paranormal activities, we might think, that if the vehicle, what would use magnetic engines would operate near some building, would the high-voltage electric field cause the phenomenon like move metal dishes. In many countries have been tested the man-made UFOs and the problem has always been the power source. Here I must mention, that when I'm writing about the saucer-shaped craft, I mean that the cross-section of the craft would actually look like the hat.

The hypothetical man-made UFO could look like shellfish. 

And the vertical form of the device could be everything.  But if we are thinking about the round, or saucer-shaped form, that would allow that the craft could move every direction in the same speed, and the horizontal movements can be created by using the radially installed rocket or ion-rocket engines. That hat-shaped space device would rotate the plasma through the hole, where is installed the high power magnets, what would pull the ions through that hole.


The rotating plasma would make overpressure under the device, and that will rise it to hover on the airborne. This system could also installed to every kind of aviation vehicles. That would give the change to create vehicles, what has outstanding maneuverability, and the idea of this kind of systems have claimed to get from the UFO encounters.

The horizontal magnetic ion-accelerators could cause shellfish-shaped form. The craft would use those systems to horizontal movements. This could explain the electric disturbances near the UFO incidents. 

The idea of this kind of devices is that they can rise to airborne and if the device can fly horizontally by using quite a small jet or rocket motors, and this thing would also work well if the craft is a cigar-shaped thing. If under the vehicle is the magnet track, it can use ions to move horizontally.

In this case, the device would have furrows on the outer layer, and it would look a little bit like a shellfish. The thing is that the magnets would make ionized gas layer around the craft, and the magnets, what are in its outer layer would use those ions for making the horizontal thrust.

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

The leader of OPEC (Organization of the Petrochemical Exporting Countries) has been nervous about this environmental activism, and that shows that activism has an influence on that kind of powerful actors. The thing is that the position of the leading actors of producers of the oil and natural gas exporters the leaders of those countries have guaranteed their position in the international field.

If some nation would make those actors angry, it will face the rise of the price of the petrochemical products. And the position of the ruler of those vital natural resources has been caused, that those leaders have been above the judgment of the public media.

The economic power of OPEC is really large, and that power has caused, that the Western world has got the problems to justify the bombardments, what has made the alliance, what is lead by Saudi-Arabia. And there is another very big thing in the natural resource trade. The rise of the military power of Russia has been financing by the Western World by buying the natural gas and oil from Russia.

So this makes very difficult to speak about the problems, what oil and natural gas would cause in the world. Every single kilowatt of energy, what is produced by using another method than buying the oil and natural gas from OPEC is taking money off the pocket of those countries.

But when we are talking another thing about activism, we might face the thing, that it would bring the mind of the people other things than OPEC. The thing is that there are many things, what we have kept something considered self-evident. And when we are thinking about things like cars and other things, they have been symbols for the independent people. If people would not have cars, there would be a big loss of the taxes, what the government collects from people.

But the activism itself has turned the world. In the past keeping silence about the difficult and communal things have been kept as the mark of being adult. And the activism itself has been the thing, what was somehow childish. There have been claiming, that the activism has no influence for the rulers, and people should keep their mouth shut when big boys are talking.

If somebody had a different kind of opinions should go to get some help. But as we see, if somebody would get nervous or attacks against activists, the thing what those people say has got influence. And the purpose of activism is to cause the influence on the people, that they would see the things, what activist wants them to see.

About the Science Fiction novels and the way how people handle things in those books

About the Science Fiction novels and the way how people handle things in those books

When we are thinking about the SciFi books we are facing the attitude, that scientists always work imprudently. And military men are going to fix the errors, what scientists make. This is the normal attitude around the media when they are talking about weapon research and military contractors.

The men, who made nuclear bomb were criminals, and military personnel, who operate those bombs are innocent poor people, who are forced to use those weapons. But then we might take another point of view about those things, and ask "why we always must benefit everything, what somebody offers?".

When we are thinking about the scientists, who are working in the secret research plants in somewhere at other planets, we must say, that the persons who are making that kind of bases and make the things like contacting to another civilization possible are persons, who are making this kind of things possible. If we are thinking about the philosophical problem about crime, where somebody leaves the weapon in the hands of the people, who would use it against somebody else, we must realize that the person, who gives the opportunity and tool for crime is the same way guilty as the person, who uses that weapon.

Especially if the person who gives the weapon, and knows that the inmate uses it against other people are guilty of giving that weapon. But the person who uses and takes that weapon is making own decision about the use of lethal force, and that means that it would release the actor from responsibility. The user of the weapon is guilty about things, what the weapon makes when it is in the hand of the user.

Another way to think about scientists is that they are some kind of children, who don't understand, what they are doing. But when we are thinking otherwise, scientists are creating weapons, and weapons are toys in the hands of the military. And the point is that adults are making toys for children.

An adult person stands the criticism, what is targeting the adult person's personality. When scientists make their work, they must think, what they are going to do, and use self-criticism about their work.  So would we buy an assault rifle to the child? The thing is that we must not make or buy everything that we see and create everything that comes in our mind.

When we are observing this kind of things more careful, we might compare that kind of things in the point of view of a child who is left alone in the house with the tinderbox. In that case, the circumstances, what are making some actions possible are the house. So if we would leave the child without attention to that house and tinderbox in hand, there are very big problems ahead.

 If we don't give instructions, what that child must do, the case is that sooner or later the house would burn. The thing is that the person, who lives a child in the house should know, that something would happen, especially if that adult person would say, that "use that tinderbox as the light". So if the instructions are wrong,  the results would be extremely dangerous. And if we would leave somebody without attention on some other planet, could the results be something else, then we want.

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

When physics make something, that person is connected to the observations, what has been made. That means physics must make every decision by using the tools like particle accelerators and prove every single word, what that person says, and the thing, what makes the life of physics sometimes really boring is that they must reserve those physical tools for their tests. And every part of the life of physics is connected to the material and nothing else can exist than material. The thing, what makes the life of physics so stiff is the need to prove those things.

But here we must say that the philosopher must also prove the things, what that person claims. But the proof must be done by using the rhetoric method. In real life philosophy or pure philosophy, the philosopher must use language and rhetorics to make the opponent become convicted that the thing, what the philosopher says is the truth. So the philosopher should not make empiric tests in the work. In some claiming physics just conducts things what that person sees to the form of doctoral dissertation.

So what is the doctor of philosophy?

Philosopher has the freedom to take also other dimensions in the work than physics. That means that the philosopher would take the spiritual aspect along with material if that person can convict people that the thing, what philosopher claims is true by using rhetoric way to confuse people. So that's why the philosophy is a more flexible thing than some kind of physics.

 When we are thinking about the doctoral degree of philosophy, we must understand that the doctors of mathematics and many other abstract sciences are actually the doctors of philosophy. And here we can think that mathematics is so-called empiric science, but it is actually also the part of philosophy or abstract science. When we are thinking about the doctoral thesis about mathematics, we are facing thing, that the word of mathematics is an abstract word.

Every single part of that thesis must be made by using the methodology, what mathematics has been accepted. And every single part of mathematics bases the thing, that we have ten fingers. That thing has brought us the numeric system, where we are using the decimal system, what bases the number ten. And somebody has thought that what if the Sumerian high priest, what has accepted the numeric system would be lost one finger. Would that mean that we would have a decimal system, what bases the number 9?

Or what if some mathematicians would create an idea that the calculations would go linear way. That means that the brackets would not have mean, and the multiplication would not have a special place in the formula? So what kind of world would be in that kind of cases? Would it somehow different than it is today?

Of course, there are numbers, what has no opponent in the normal life. Those numbers are called as the complex numbers, and that thing is a little bit interesting. The complex numbers have two points in coordinates. And that means that we cannot use them in real life.

The real number is the thing, what we can calculate normally, but the complex part, what is above the coordinates of Y-axel is impossible to model in some shops. But that kind of numbers is the product of very clever mathematicians use of brains. Those things are a really interesting way to think.

Another old gravestone

Another old gravestone

In the next text is simultaneous repeated one word. And here I must say, that the thing is that I have thought many times, what is the story behind that signature? Was there something special, what that person made in those cases? Or was it made for remembering people for something?

When we are looking at this old gravestone, we might face interesting detail in that memorial. Of course, the grave is left without attention, but if there is some remarkable person, I thought that family would be interesting about that grave. But how important and the remarkable person the long-term juror has been?

There is a signature of the juror, and the thing, why I know that this man was the juror, is that there is mentioned, that he had honorific, what was admit by the head judge of the court to the person, who has made the long career in the court system as the juror. So this kind of details makes me interesting about this kind of things, because if the family members of that man must be protected, why they mentioned the position of that graved person as the juror.

The thing is why this signature is marked on the gravestone? This kind of things are remarkable details in the graves, and tell that there is something special about this kind of persons. And of course, why the position as the long- term juror has been mentioned? This kind of details makes the research of history so interesting.

Was there something special about this person, except that he was working as the juror in a long period? Nobody makes those things just for fun, and here we must say, that there must also be some reason to put the signature on the gravestone. This kind of things makes old cemeteries interesting. And as you might notice the grave has not been taking care. Why nobody visits there?

Could we someday get electricity straight from nature by using so electronegative material that it would suck the necessary electricity straight from nature?

Could we someday get electricity straight from nature by using so electronegative material that it would suck the necessary electricity straight from nature? 

The next writing is about the theoretical power source, what bases the system, which will transform the plasma into the electricity. if this system would be possible, it will make a revolution in the spacecraft design.

There is a possibility that in the distant future, we can create the craft, what would take the electric power for all its functions directly from the space. The principle of this kind of system is it benefits the ions of the space for creating the power of its operations.

In theory, there would be two ways to make that kind of system. The first one is to make a very long radio antenna, where the electricity or free electrons would transfer, and make the electricity to the systems. The second one version would base the electronegative material, what does not exist yet. The material would transfer the electrons through it, and then that material allows to fly without internal electric source.

In this form, the power system would actually transfer the electrons to the drive and support systems of the ionized gas or plasma, what most of the material of the space is. The ionized gas would make possible to create the electric field in the system, and that thing would make possible to fly in space without an internal power source.

The vital part of the system would be the generator, what works only in the zero-gravity conditions. The parts of that generator would not have physical contact together, and that allows it to rotate with extremely fast speed. So there is the electric motor, what parts are hovering in the non-gravitational conditions, and the other part would be the generator. 

The electricity of the induction motor would get from the system, which conducts the electricity from the plasma to that electric motor. If the temperature of that system would be low enough, the system will turn to superconducting, which makes it more effective.

The idea of this kind of thing would not be new, and at least Nikola Tesla got ideas of the flying machines, what would use the radio waves or wireless electric transfer system. And there have been ideas to create even the high voltage power by using the power of the ions. The idea based on the wheel, what is floating in the generator in the weightless conditions.

When the electricity of the ions would transfer in the stators, the rotor starts to rotate, and because there would be a vacuum in this tube or generator, the wheel or rotor would start to rotate extreme high speed, because there is no friction in this system. And this generator would rotate very long time because no part of it has no physical contact with other parts of that thing.

The fascinating idea of living forever

The fascinating idea of living forever

"Roswell incident" has given many topics for philosophers and scientists

In this writing, I would not tell stories about the Roswell case. The idea is to tell a story about the ideas, what that case has brought in the head of some philosophers or scientists. This kind of stories are fascinating many innovative people and bring many ideas in their mind, where could benefit the Internet and the most modern technology. But in the beginning, I will rehearse what means "Roswell incident". And more details about that case you might look from the Internet.

In some stories, the US Air Force has been captured dead humanoids from some spacecraft, and that story is involving tale that some of those bodies were stored in liquid nitrogen or liquid helium. If the electricity would conduct to the brains of those individuals, the researchers could communicate with that thing. There are many versions of this tale, and one is that the most brilliant scientists are stored in a very cold place, where they will recall to serve people when their services are needed.

The idea is that when the temperature would decrease near the Zero Kelvin, what is the absolute point of zero, the molecular functions in the body are ended. And if the computers are connected to the brains, what will stimulate with electricity, that person would communicate with people in this way, and technically those persons would live forever if the temperature remains very low.

This has been conducted the theory, that maybe in tomorrow we could live forever on the Internet as the EEG, which communicates with computers by using multi-level operating systems. In this case, the EEG would be the upper-level operating system, and the regular computer would be the lower level system. That thing allows storing human mind in the digital world forever, and in the wildest dreams that EEG would conduct the real person, and this allows that the people would technically live forever.

Can the algorithm operate as the assassin?

If the people would be stored on the Internet as the form of the algorithm, that would bring one very interesting point of view in the mind of philosophers and other people. That thing is that if somebody would destroy that algorithm would that person get prosecution about murder, and in fact, there is one thing that also made me think about the future. This thing is that if we would store our mind on the Internet, would we face the situation, wherein the net would be the assassination algorithms, what would destroy the stored EEG.

In fact, the assassination algorithms are possible, and they are the weapons of the next generation. They can slip in the mobile telephone, and then start the subliminal commands in that device. Or they can jump in the computer systems of aircraft, or support systems. So the algorithm can load too little fuel in the tank, and then the accident will be sure if this happens over the mountain area. Or it can program the autopilot act dangerously during the landing, which causes a really terrible situation.

When we are thinking about the assassination algorithm, that computer program can take some vehicle like robot taxi under the control, and when it locates the targeted person, it would increase the speed. Then the system would just slip away from the computer, and then there is no trace about them. And this makes them a very dangerous tool in the wrong hands.

In the future, the space travelers would make Dyson's spheres near the target stars

In the future, the space travelers would make Dyson's spheres near the target stars

When I'm talking about advanced civilizations, I'm talking also the human race. In the future, we might create Dyson's sphere near the target star and live in that space station. An advanced civilization could make their own artificial planet near some star, and benefit the ice asteroids what are orbiting the star and use that water in Dyson's sphere.

If we would think Dyson's sphere as the base near another star, that thing would be more suitable than some planet for the base, because that artificial planet would not contain any micro-organisms. The atmosphere would also be fully controlled, and that would make it more comfortable than some natural planet, and the life in that Dyson's sphere would be fully controlled. Sometimes some philosophers have introduced the idea, that the civilization, what lives on some planet would be controlled by using Death Stars, the giant Dyson's spheres, what are equipped with ion cannons, what is capable to shoot antimatter to that planet, what could destroy the entire planet.

That thing can be the ball-shaped space station, so-called Dyson's sphere, what will work like hollow Earth. That thing would create artificial gravity by using rotation, and the centrifugal force would create artificial gravity in the inner layer of this ball. And in the middle of that space station would be the artificial sun or fusion reactor, what will create electric power for that thing.

In some stories, people are flying to the stars, and this is the standard thing in the science fiction stories. And sometimes the scientists want to keep us restless, and they say, that there is not habitable planet orbiting some stars, and that's it, we cannot find humanoids from those stars as you might know.

Advanced aliens would not need planets

But otherwise, we are facing little paradox about this philosophical thought, because if we are thinking about the primitive civilizations, those aliens would not travel of life near to those stars, but if we are thinking about advanced civilizations, what can operate with advanced space technology. And that could build things like asteroid spacecraft. We must realize that those humanoids or astronauts can create their own planet by hollow the asteroid, and create the space station inside it. That thing can be a very interesting version of space travel.

 And maybe in the distant future, we would be the civilization, what would travel to another solar system and meet intelligent but primitive aliens, and who knows, what we would do in that situation. Here we must say, those very advanced civilizations might not be addicted by the starlight, and middle of those ball-shaped space stations could be created the artificial fusion.

In that system would be used the same kind of technology, what is used in NIF (National Ignition Facility), where the fusion particle would put in the center of the ball-shaped chamber, and then it would target by lasers or microwave systems, what will create the artificial sun in the middle of the ball. In fact, a similar system could be installed in the much larger ball, which could be massive Dyson's sphere. The ball-shaped space station would rotate and the rotating structure makes the artificial gravity possible.

The writing about our relationship about death

The writing about our relationship about death

One of the most difficult questions in philosophy is, how we will act opposite side if there is playing dying player?

Sometimes I have asked myself, that why the main character of the movies, what are told about dying is ever been the man, who looks like Santa Claus who is covered by tattoos. Those people need empathy same way as the cute nice girls.  Have you seen the movie "Cool kids don't cry"? It's a story about the girl, who is dying in cancer, and the things, what the classmates would do with her. And there is one thing, what I started to think when I looked at the trailer.

The thing is concerning the scene, where that character played the football as a goalkeeper, and that thing made me think about one thing, and sometimes I feel like a heartless bastard when I'm thinking about that thing, what is sometimes in those cases, where the dying patient comes to the team. The thing is that we all want to give joy and happiness to those people, whose life will be ending too soon, but have you ever thought, what might happen if the thing about cancer has not told to some players in the opposite side?

They could kick the ball with full force, and then that patient might break the bones, or here I must ask one question, what I ever dare: would you score to that goal? I sometimes thought that there would be the pupil or student, who would ever make goals before, and then that person would make the only score to the goal, what is guarded by a cancer patient. Would that person be happy about that goal?

I think that this thing is really embarrassing for everybody. Or how would those players act, if the player would die in Hepatitis B, what is caused by the use of drugs? Or what if that person would be an adult man, who is dying in liver cirrhosis, what has been caused because of heavy drinking? This is an interesting thing because also dossers would need empathy at that moment. Would we show empathy to the elder man, who looks like Santa Claus or the person, who is dying because of the use of doping? The liver can be destroyed also because of using the anabolic steroids, so would we support the person, who is full of tattoos, and looks like a little bit less cute than the young girl?

Moral problems are not easy to solve

This is the moral problem, what I have sometimes thought. Is morally justified to make scores to goals, what are guarded by a person, who might die very soon. Sometimes there is claiming that the game is game, and otherwise, there is an ethic problem, because that person should win in the last game, what that person would ever play, and this kind of things are really difficult.

How would you answer this kind of questions? Or what if this person plays very often in front of the goal? Is that acceptable in a moral and ethic point of view to think? Is it right to use that kind of player for making sure, that the opposite players would not dare to make goals? And how that thing would influence another player of that team?  Is this thing acceptable or not, this is the question, there are no simple answers.

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

(Artuk.org)

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"


Alchemist worked in front of other people 

There are many paintings, which has this name, and some of those paintings are made by unknown artists, and the reason for that might be that those painters were afraid of revenge because some alchemists were wanted for witchcraft. If the painter hired the location of the witch that could cause that the painter would get the death penalty for hiring that information.

Also, alchemists didn't want that people would know that they were alchemists, and the painter wanted to hide the identity of the model and himself. Because if the alchemist has told about the experiments to the painter, that would be told to keep his own identity secret. One of the most interesting detail in this painting is, that alchemist reads the book.

Was real alchemist only written the instructions to "human robot", who made those experiments by following the texts?

In that book might be the instructions for the experiments what this man makes and in this case the person, who makes the tests or practical research might be the "human robot", who would make practical work, and the identity of the real mastermind was covered that way. If the instructions for tests would be clear enough, even the regular person would make the practical things and the real person, who made ideas and instructions for the test might stand as a hidden identity. And if the instructions would be written to that book even child can read them to the maker of the test.

I used this image as the illustration image in the writing about Alchemy, and now I will write something about this painting. There is one very interesting detail, or actually, there are many details, what we should think, and one of them is that alchemist is working in the front of the eyes of the normal people and he also allows children play in the next to him. And that means that this man seems to have nothing to hide, and then we can think, do those people even understand things, what alchemist makes?

Do they see the ultimate genius or some person, who might be some bookkeeper or something like that? The reason why alchemist allows those people to see him at work is that if there would be some police or soldiers, who are asking about the work of that man, would somebody tell it to him. And the way, how those people would say that thing is "hey sheriffs are looking for you, and what are you done"? So the alchemist would not tell his name to those people. But there are many things, which are really interesting details in that image.

Alchemists must hide their work from other people

There are many things, what made people really suspicious of alchemists, who were claimed to made contract with the devil. Those persons tested medical operations, which would be prohibited even in modern times, and that's why they must hide their notes in the codes.  Because if they were uncovered that Alchemist would send to jail or even hang because of the experiments.

One of those codes might be the globe, where is the line. That could be the instructions of the separation surgery of the cerebral hemispheres, what is made for a cure for epilepsy, and maybe some of those men made those surgeries. When we are talking about surgery, we must remember that the successful operation is different than operation, and maybe many people died in those tests.

They were claimed to made contract with devil himself 

The idea was that if the corpus callosum would cut in the early ages, there would grow the person who has two fully advanced humans in one body. The thing is that if the corpus callosum would cut the brains would have problems with synchronizing their operations, and that means that there would be problems with social skills and concentration because cerebral hemispheres cannot communicate together with the normal way.

I don't know has anyone made those surgical operations in the time, when this painting has been painted and they are strictly prohibited except for the cure of epilepsy.  The metal dome over the skull tells that the Alchemist has skills to control the mind of people, and that person might use the things like suggestion and hallucinate and stunning vegetables and mushrooms for controlling the person.