The classical error in a common way to translate theories

The classical error in a common way to translate theories

The common error in theories and formulas is that they are meant for common use. They are not meant for every purpose. Theories can compare to the tools, which are used in machinery. Screwdrivers are not suitable for every part of the machines, and the adjustable wrenches are not all times fit the holes. If we would want to make fast and perfect work, we might want to use the electric tools where is the torque wrench. The problem of those machines is that they are not suitable for every condition, because they need electricity. Before we can use those systems, we must create the generator, which gives electricity for those high-tech tools, which makes assembly very effective. 

And every kind of machines is not suitable for every kind of conditions. The machine tools, what are meant for underwater work are not meant for working at the normal conditions, and the opposite way to think is that electric tools are not suitable for underwater working, where is needed the hydraulic tools because of the risk of electric shock. In the theories and formulas is the same effect. We cannot handle every phenomenon and area by using the same theories. And when we are thinking about the famous E=Mc² we are many times forgotten that this theory is meant for calculating the energy levels, what are created by nuclear reactions. 

When we are thinking the personality of Einstein, we must realize that there was somebody who teaches that man and gives the room for the creation of the genius of the millennium. But when we are looking the truth straight to eyes, there were many men before Einstein, and he was the top of the line. But there were men after him, who developed the ideas what Einstein introduced. And one of them was Stephen Hawking. The man who was captured in the wheelchair because of ALS syndrome. 

This syndrome might be a very great personal tragedy for that man, who was well known about the images, where he sat in that chair with his computer, what used the interface, what was able to control with eye movements. That man worked hard for developing the ideas, what Einstein introduced, and that thing was continuing of the series of the men, what were lived a long time before Einstein. There is named thing, what is known for him, and that is the Hawking radiation. Einstein was the top in natural sciences, and there were top men before him like Isaac Newton, who used the calculation machine first for checking the results for the derivate and integrates. 

He created those formulas along with Gottfried Leibnitz, who made the first mechanic computer, which allowed to calculate series. But when we are thinking about paradoxes and tragedies, we must say that the ALS was the reason why Hawking had so much time for working with the formulas of Einstein. That limited the social life and isolated that intelligent man from other people and those formulas gave him the way to live. 

And here we must say if we would like to seem heartless and cold persons, that case what was very difficult for the life of Stephen Hawking was probably good for science. In sometimes people might think that the reason, why Einstein won the election of the 20th century most remarkable scientists or physicians was that he was dead. 

Here I must say that people like Feynman or Dyson cannot win those games is that they are Americans. Here we almost forgot the one great man in the history of physics, Dr. Ernst Rutherford (1)was a New Zealander, who died just before the Second World War, and the work of that person is only the nuclear physics, what means that man was, of course, influential person, and his work benefited in the Manhattan program, but somehow this great man is quite unknown for great audience even if that man created fusion reaction in the first time, when he showed fusion of deuterium to helium in 1934(2). He made a theory about the splitting of the atom and gave the road to creating the first atom reactor in the University of Chicago. 

So by benefiting the work of Rutherford, Enrico Fermi created the first nuclear reactor by benefiting the work what Rutherford has made, so would the title of the most remarkable scientists belong to Rutherford and Fermi, or maybe to Thompson, who invented Electron, and whose work Rutherford benefited. And the thing is that in some publications the reason, that some persons use the American way to write English would be introduced the reason for decrease the scores or value of the work. 

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Rutherford

(2) https://www.euro-fusion.org/fusion/history-of-fusion/