A couple of words about theories.
If we want to prove theories wrong we can use some scientific facts for that. Or we can say that metering systems have been broken in that time. And one version to say that somebody is wrong is argument things by saying that we have believed that thing over 200 years. Or we can say that we have a room at University, and that's why other people must believe us. Then we can go to make publications, which is full of very complicated formulas, and then nobody else understands those things.
Wikipedia is claiming that the computer cannot have a limitless capacity to calculate data. Then we might ask, whoever said the thing, that the computers might have limitless capacity or speed to handle bits. Every tool in the universe has limits. Even theoretical quantum computers have limits. They are fast but not blinding fast. Human brains have also the capacity to handle information. That is the reason, why many people, who are making difficult things have problems to remember some other things, what might feel normal to us.
Theories are theories until they are proven true. And the process for that is that at the first there is theory, then conjecture, what means theory, what is under observation, and after that, the name of the theory is turned to the law od science. A good example of this is the Riemann's conjecture, what is the formula, where is no zero-point, and what is used to calculate the binary numbers in the field of mathematics.
In the calculations like proving the truth that Riemann's conjecture has no zero-point is needed to use very high-power and fast computers. This is a really interesting paradox because if the Riemann's conjecture continues forever without zero-point we cannot ever calculate all numbers. And there is always the possibility that the formula would reach the zero-point in the next number.
So this is one way to observe the calculations, what is needed extreme powerful computers. Those binary numbers are needed to secure data transmission. The idea of mathematics is that this science is a pure abstraction. But the proofing hose formulas must be done by using mathematical rules. This thing is many times mentioned in many books and texts. The thing is that every theory has weaknesses.
When we are talking about geometry, we must remember that the same computers, what are calculating the Riemann's conjecture in the very long time, would handle things like triangles by very high speed. And there is one biggest mystery in mathematics. Does Pi, the relation between the length of the circle and its radius has something called precise value. The computers have calculated billions of numbers for that thing, and that is 3,14 and many numbers behind the dot.
Of course, measurement tools have little bit advanced than in the time of Euclide or Pythagoras. Sometimes I have thought that those men didn't have the compass, which is equipped with the meter, where is possible to mark the beginning point of the circle, and then when the drawer makes the circle the graduation shows the exact length of the circle.
That thing didn't the value of Pi at all, but anyway those tools are really interesting advance for mankind. That is one of the most boring books in the world. This thing has been given an idea to calculate the triangles by using extremely long decimal numbers, and because the results have become more accurate, there is founded mistakes between calculations and real-world images.
So that thing has been brought the new way to think about things. The new evidence would be brought a new kind of tools. And when we are thinking things like cosmology, what is a little bit like physics, there is one difference between those things. The cosmology has lost the will to prove everything by using calculations.
The thing that the black hole pulls material and photons inside it would mean that in this really specific place in the universe could happen something, what is not possible anywhere else. But actually, we cannot know does the black hole even pull anything inside it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Researchers are trying to create new alternatives for rockets.
"Illustration of an imaginative artwork depicting satellites piled up like a stack of pancakes. Image generated by AI." (Sustainab...

-
"Two twisted boron nitride layers (blue and pink) create a crystal lattice at a distance in which electrons (gold) can arrange themselv...
-
"Visualization of the bridge recombinase mechanism highlighting the donor and target binding loops. Credit: Visual Science" (Scite...
-
Above Candela P-12, (Image: Candela) The new "flying hydrofoils" like the Swedish "Candela" can rise high above waves. T...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.