The human brains and quantum computing

The human brains and quantum computing

1) The qubit operates in the same role in quantum computer with a neurotransmitter in human brains

The role of the qubit in the quantum computer is the same as the neurotransmitter in the human brains. So what would be the difference between the qubit and neurotransmitter? The thing is that the neurotransmitter would be acting in the normal temperature. So why human brains are more effective than quantum computers?

The answer would be that there are more values in the neurotransmitter than qubit, which has only three values 0,1 and 2. The form of the qubit is like the water molecule, which makes it possible to create this kind of value by touching the gate. If one corner touches the gate the value is one, two corners touch the gate the value is one and three corners are touching the value of that molecule is two. But what if the qubit would have let's say about 110 corners, how effective it could be?

2) What if the quantum computer would have qubit, what has so many contact layers as the neurotransmitter? Would the quantum computer turn the same way intelligent and creative with human brains?

The value of qubit is always one under contact points because the first value is 0. The contact point is the point, where electricity of qubit transfers to the wire. The thing is that the quantum computer handles data also in rows and lines, which gives it very powerful data handling ability. There have been made tests by using the flat cable as the qubit, where each wire in that cable would transfer the same data at the same time in many microprocessors in the zero-kelvin degrees.

But would those solutions work is the different question? The thing is that this kind of system is the most effective. The problem is that they are very large and require a very low temperature for working as they should.

The thing why human brains are the most effective computing system is that human brains can operate on multiple levels. And if we would model that system to a computer, that thing requires that the transmitter, what is called as qubit would have more values than three. The qubit has three corners but the neurotransmitter has many more corners. So the last one offers more value for this kind of equipment. So the neurotransmitters are the organic version of qubits.

3) When quantum computing has been under discussion, the thing is that people are forgetting that the technology in that area is at the test level, and that's why those systems are still mainly theoretical levels. But when we are thinking that the value of qubit is changing between levels 0,1 and 2, we might think that qubit itself is limitless. 

So what if we can replace the water-molecule shaped molecular qubit with the fullerene-based qubit, we would have the qubit, what has values 0 to 109 or even greater, and that kind of theoretical systems could give the computer more powerful capacities than human brains have. The fullerene-based qubits would be the carbon molecules, what are equipped with the horns, what is looking like the small sticks or horns, and that thing can give the qubit many other values than just the 0, 1 and 2.

4) What if the fullerene would be used as the qubit?

So what if the qubit has values 0 to 109? That would give the computer more levels to use handle data than simple water-molecule looking like qubits. The thing is that this kind of system can handle the data even more effectively than human brains, as I have written before. But there is one very interesting thing, what that kind of fullerene-based qubit can do, and that thing can be used to turn the human brains to use the qubit-based technology.

Or actually, human brains already use qubits as the neural transmitters so the model of the quantum computer, what uses the molecular cubits is taken from the human brains. The neural transmitters are acting like molecular qubits, as I have written at the beginning of that text. So the thing is that human brains are extremely complicated and effective quantum computers.

5) Maybe somewhere in the future, the qubit can be the atom, what oscillation can be controlled. 

But what if we would create more effective qubits than fullerene? Could we someday turn single atom to qubit and benefit the electrons as the data transfer tool? If we would use xenon atom what serial number in the periodic table of elements for that purpose, the values, what qubit could get are 0 to 53. The value of qubit is always one below the contact points.

If we are thinking that the xenon atom would be in the chamber, where it's oscillation can be fully controlled that system can use the principle that the number of electrons, what is touching the gate would give value for that qubit, the touch of one electron would mean value 0 and if every electron is touching the gate the value would be 53 because the first value of qubit is 0.

A fullerene is an effective tool for a qubit, but what if we would increase the speed and values of the qubits by changing the form of the qubit to electrons. This is an even more hypothetical version of the qubits, and it bases the value of the electron core of the atoms.

In this version, the single atoms would form the qubit. When the atom would be in the chamber, the data can be transfer to it by using the emission of radiation, which would stress the nucleus. And then the electrons would impact the wall of the chamber.

Let's say that the atom that is used is xenon, and the number of this element is 54. So there are 54 electrons on its cores. And that means that this theoretical qubit can get the values 0 to 53, and the problem is how to control the oscillation of this kind of system. But if that kind of version of the qubit can be created someday that kind of chamber-based qubit, where electrons are acting like molecular qubits, that kind of system can act as the part of the artificial neuron.