Skip to main content

Difference between normal and philosophical way to think





Difference between normal and philosophical way to think

The philosophical writing can handle almost everything. Sometimes people might laugh when I write about plastic bites and other things, which might look very common, but somehow I always find something, that I may be supposed not to find. But don't worry the most well-known philosophical problem is handling thing, what is one of the most common in the world. That thing is a glass of water. The problem or an example goes that when the professor comes in the lecture hall, that person always puts the glass of water on the table.

What is the difference between the everyday way to think and a philosophical way of thinking? Everyday thinking is that there is a glass of water. And the philosophical way to think about this kind of thing is because there is a glass of water, we might ask why there is a glass of water? Or what happens if there is no glass of water? Is there some kind of deeper meaning about that kind of glass? The thing in a philosophical way to think is that the idea is to find the deeper essence of the things, what is looking like easy. And the questions what should do with philosophical writings and other things is to make three questions about the thing, what is under the supervision.

1) What is the thing?

2) Why the thing is where it is? Or why that thing is so interesting?

3) Why does it look like something?


In this writing, we might see the plastic bag. So we might notice that thing is a plastic bag, and nothing is interesting about that thing. But what if that plastic bag is on the table of some table? Did somebody left it there in purpose, or why that thing was not taken to the garbage? Was the purpose to give that plastic bag to somebody else?

And here we might realize, that the thing is that there might come personnel of the staff, and at least remark of that kind of garbage. So the thing why the plastic bag is looking like something is the bag can be identified, but this example is meant to show, how the deeper way to think might uncover something very interesting in the everyday life. This is why some people in ancient Greece started to think things, like the deepest form of the material.

They made an idea that there is somewhere deep inside the atomic structure is the "Atmos", a particle that we cannot dismantle. The same way we can think things like states. Sooner or later we would face the end of the line,  of people who are the leaders. And then we are facing the person, who is the top leader. So those philosophers thought that "atmos "existed.

There must be the final form of material, which cannot be section anymore. But we are not found that final particle yet. The researchers are finding smaller and smaller particles inside the quarks. But they cannot find the "atmos". That thing is the gate between the wave movement and material. But we will always find another and another particle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting armor has