Chancing attitudes are given new tools for researchers also in criminal investigations

Chancing attitudes are given new tools for researchers also in criminal investigations

Many time scientists and researchers have been accused because of they or in this case we are always looking for things, what seems like small or minimal. Those minimal details might cause fatal things about the way of thinking. The way to see things is always changing because attitudes are changing and the instruments, how to share data and get data have also become more accurate. But the attitudes are the most important thing, what what is causing, that many things that have been taboo before this day has been involved in the research. I use the Holocaust in this text as an example, how the criminal mind works.

When we are facing things like mass crimes and war crimes, the attitudes, and opinions about the collective guilty are changing to the personal blame, which means that all Muslims are not blamed about terrorism. And the research has also turned the idea of blaming all society about the crimes, what a couple of people have been done. When we are thinking about the Holocaust, the thing that the research has become more accurate has opened one thing, and that thing is that when Nazis destroyed the evidence about their crimes, like death camps, they didn't remove all evidence.

They just destroyed evidence about the identity of persons who made those crimes like their fingerprints. And when we are thinking about the things, that Himmler's idea was that the personnel of the mass-murdering camps were mostly the volunteers from the eastern areas and the only couple of persons of that staff came from Germany, we might think that that for personnel were reserved the fate in gas chambers. When we are talking about those criminals, we have forgotten, that some of those persons might use faked identities, and that's why those people can avoid criminal prosecution process.

The thing what has been forgotten is that in some camps is no survivors at all, and those people who could tell something, are criminals themselves. Or were criminals, if they die a long time ago for natural reasons or by other criminals, who thought that they knew too much. And wad the famous "Angel of Death" Josef Mengele one of the people, who faced the fate by the hand of the poisoner, because he might recognize somebody, who had something to hide, and then the "agent orange" was sent to his body.

And the small number of German personnel who were working in those "special camps" like Treblinka as the leading roles allowed hiding those brutal crimes. If those persons spoke, they could be eliminated immediately by executing them. And if the nazi chiefs have been uncovered as the criminals, that would happen after their death. This is one very scary view of the holocaust.

But when we are thinking about attitudes for crime, we have forgotten that with every brutality the Holocaust is a good example of how criminals are always working. The idea is always that the bosses, who are making crimes are different than people who are ordering crimes. This is the thing, what we must always remember when we are talking about research and attitudes, what are sometimes breaking the crime investigations.

When we are investigating crimes, we must remember that also women can make brutal crimes as well as men. This is one thing, what people have always forgotten when they are talking about crimes. The strange thing in the cases of the "Zodiac" or "Original night stalker" is that those crimes have not been solved. And the thing, what might cause those things is the attitude that some criminals are always men.

When we are thinking about the rapist, who uses a condom, we are forgotten the thing, that the also female criminals can use the women sex toys for setting up the rape, and the thing is that the "Original night stalker" might be somewhere. There have been many serial killers, who used that name or acronym, and that means that those famous and very brutal killers might be somewhere alive.