 |
Gibbs phase rule collapsed and the Theory of Relativity remains
The Gibbs Phase rule has been collapsed(1), and that thing has been shown how powerful new calculator machines can change the world. Or in fact, we shouldn't say that phase order is collapsed even if there small error. The new calculators can use billions of decimals in the calculations, and there will be found other errors and dimensions in many other calculations and scientific facts.
Accuracy is important when we are talking about calculations.
When we are calculating and proving something, we must realize that the accuracy in proving and describing the proving is an important thing. When does somebody say that Einstein's Theory of Relativity remains and stands in critical tests we should ask wich Theory of Relativity?
Albert Einstein made two theories of relativity, The Theory of Special Relativity(2) and the Theory of General Relativity(3), which is a little bit different. The reason for making the Theory of General Relativity is that there were differences between the calculations and observations of the trajectory of Planet Mercury.
Crossing the speed of the light near the black hole happens only at the point of the event horizon. Not near this point. The event horizon is the point, where the escaping velocity is rising higher than the speed of the light.
The accuracy of this kind of thing like crossing the speed of the light is important. The point where that happens is the event horizon of the black hole and the reason for that is beyond that point even the light cannot escape, because the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light. So at a distance of millimeter from the front of it, the light can escape.
Are Einstein's relativity theories suitable for handling the problems of the quantum world?
Do the theories of relativity fit in the quantum world? Is it possible that we cannot fit the theories of relativity what is meant for the world where gravity is dominant to the world where some other fundamental interactions or forms of fundamental interactions(4) are dominant? If the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) (5) theory can be proven or made, that means that the four fundamental interactions are only the form of the same interactions.
And the thing is that the theories of relativity are meant for handling the interaction of big and massive particles like planets. That means the theories of relativity cannot handle the interactions of extremely small particles like the electron core and nucleus of the atom the neutrons, protons, and quarks.
When we are trying to mix or connect quantum mechanics and Einstein's theories of relativity, we must understand one thing. The interaction in the quantum world is weak because the distances and dimensions of the quantum world are extremely small.
So there is a possibility that Einstein's wonderful theories cannot fit the quantum world, where the other interactions than gravity are dominant. In the universe or rather saying our scale universe the gravity is dominant. And in the sub-atomic scale of the world the dominant thing is electromagnetic and other fundamental interactions, there is a possibility that we cannot fit theories of relativity that cannot fit in that extremely small-scale world.
(1) https://tekdeeps.com/gibbs-phase-rule-collapsed-it-took-145-years-without-any-errors/
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction
(5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.