 |
| . |
Monsters and hoaxes
Above this text is an image, what is the so-called "surgeon's photo" about that famous monster, and as you might know, this photo is a hoax. But why the maker of that photo has put that character on the lake? Why that person didn't use the sea as the background?
If "Nessie" does not exist, there are so many observations about that creature. And if that creature is visible in sonar, that means it has the skin or core that gives a sound echo. So is it a submarine or some other type of USO Unidentified Submerged Object, like some UFO what is hiding in Loch Ness. And if that thing is some kind of underwater UFO, why it is at that lake?
And the thing that makes "Nessie"(1) so unbelievable is that the monster lives in the lake, and there is no single bone left about that creature. There is one natural explanation for that mysterious creature, and that it's only the slime or some kind of sea snail or fungus animal.
In this case, there is a possibility that the "Nessie" would turn its body into a network of cells. In that form, where is the creature can turn itself to the thread, the creature would be very hard to detect, and if that creature will pull itself to one entirety, it can look like some kind of lizard. The fact is that sea snails can be quite big, and they can also be very poisonous.
So does the "Nessie" have some kind of connection with "Chupacabra", (2)the mythic beast of Mexico and Puerto Rico? Like "Nessie" there is no certain evidence about the existence of that beast. So officially those creatures are only folk-tales. The fact is that nobody knows the secret of the "Nessie", and there is one small little story, what might interest you in this case. There is a possibility that the "Nessie" is some kind of genetic experiment. There is a possibility that the DNA or genomes would remain in the skeletons of the dinosaur.
Is "Nessie" some kind of cloned dinosaur? This feels a little bit too wild even to me.
So what if "Nessie" was or is some kind of result of cloning of the plesiosaur(3). In that case in the egg could transfer the cells of the plesiosaur. I know that this thing could feel very rare, but there is found soft and well-remained bone marrow in the bones of tyrannosaurus rex or T-rex from museums, and that bone marrow is used to make the DNA map of that ancient beast.
But the fact is that making a clone of the plesiosaur requires very well remained DNA and the advanced biotechnology. In this case, the DNA would be readen from bone marrow, and then the nanomachines would put the base pairs of that molecule in the right places. But could that thing was done in the early 20th century.
The fact is that this thing could not be possible. And this means that the last theory seems hoax. Theoretically, the DNA of the chicken embryo can be replaced by the DNA that is taken from some dinosaur. But that requires very well remained genomes. And that means that thing would be impossible. But if the truth is this, the researchers could clean the entire lake for hiding their experiments.
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chupacabra
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiosauria
Comments
Post a Comment