We shouldn't rule out anything before we make proper research about certain topics.

We shouldn't rule out anything before we make proper research about certain topics.

Don't rule out or close something out without evidence. This is the golden rule about scientific work. And don't blame any writer, if somebody else has given wrong data. When we are living in the world, where people have unlimited access to the data, what is not classified "secret", that means there is more data in use than ever before.

So if somebody would make bad studies, that means that the writer, who uses that material is not responsible for false or bad information, what bases on the studies, what are published in some other trusted media. When we are talking about things like scientific work, we are facing things like "some student" has been writing an open letter about some other things. When we are starting to create arguments against those texts. We can always say, that they are made by students or send them to the mental hospital.

Even Einstein and Newton were students once

And in that time we forget that every great researcher like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were students once. When we are trying to analyze the texts, we should concentrate on the product, not the producer. Who cares is some physics theory made by a schizophrenic or person who uses too much alcohol? We must realize that the text, what is written in the thing, what we should estimate. We should not underestimate old masters, but we must realize that modern technology like CCD-cameras and especially supercomputers. The supercomputers can handle numbers with an accuracy of millions of decimal numbers are showing that there are found errors or inaccuracies in the many theories.

The thing is that students are many times really intelligent people. Researches and studies are many times underrated because some students are made those texts. The thing is that research and studies do not always support things that we are learning to believe in schools. And if those researches are not supporting our ideology, we can always turn to refuse to believe them. Science and studies are not democracy. There are no Gallup polls, which are chancing the observations. But otherwise without observations, what made by using trusted equipment, and confirmed by independent groups is not prove. And theories are remaining theories until the observations are falling or prove that thing.

But the problem is that we are facing the thing sometimes only half of the text is handled. When some people are publishing texts what are made by students they are taking the attitude that the text should support their view of the world. That means that they are forgetting the purpose of science and research. The purpose of the research is to bring new data and points of view to the world. The facts or how the facts are taken are things that are making research qualified or not qualified.

The small fact can uncover a huge secret.

The thing is that if we want to make some studies, we should not justify things before we have been searching for the source material. And things like AREA-51 have been shown that careful secrets are opening the secrets, what are guarding the highest class officials. The thing that uncovered the AREA-51 was the thing that there was land, which the government eminently domain twice. And this thing was shown, that there are always people who are telling things, what is not true.

When we are thinking about things like gifting reporters about the freedom of speech, I sometimes wonder the prices affect the freedom of speech? Are they gifts that are given for real and effective journalism, or are they "good boy" and "good girl" gifts, what are given for supporting governments and some other companies? What are the instructions for sharing that kind of money? Are they given for denigrating the competitors, but leaving some actors away from the articles?

The thing is that when we are thinking about things like the laws of nature, we do not always remember that the calculation methods are improving. And there have been found the inaccuracies in many theories and things that are thought to be natural laws.

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low. The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away. When the box is filled with quantum gas and som

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper? The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown. But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull. The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting armor has

Thoughts about the future, world, and technology

Search This Blog