Skip to main content

What makes hypersonic flight so interesting?


Lockheed-Martin SR-72

The image above this text portrays Lockheed-Martin SR-72 hypersonic testbed from the year 2013. That means there must be many advantages after that year, and maybe that plane is old-fashion today. (Wikipedia, Lockheed-Martin SR-72)

The hype around the hypersonic flight is not ending. There are many things that people do not know about those systems, and one is that it's not so suitable for military use than people think. The speed of those aircraft and missiles is over Mach 10+. And that means they are hard to control. And if the defender can predict the route of the hypersonic missiles and aircraft they can send the defensive systems to the course against those incomers. 

But another thing is that about 1000 kilogram weight hypersonic glider can cause extremely bad damages to the target, and in simulations, the hypersonic gliders or HGS (Hypersonic Glide System) is often sent to target through the suborbital trajectories by using ballistic missiles. Those systems are new way designed warheads that can be armed with explosives, nuclear warheads or they can trust the kinetic energy. 

The power of the 500-1000 kilogram kinetic energy warhead can imagine when we are thinking that the GAU-9  "Avenger" cannon ammunition destroys tank by single ammunition which speed is Mach 1,5. The weight of that ammunition is less than 1 kilogram. So what would the projectile make the target if its weight is 1000 kilogram and speed is Mach 10?  

The HCS (Hypersonic Cruise System) is a cruise missile or aircraft that can patrol independently or it can connect to another aircraft. The system can also be a drone that patrols independently and when the order is given, the system starts to attack. The drone can have two different engine series. 

Those modes can be the normal cruise and the attack mode. The operation of those drones might be that the drone is closing the target by using normal supersonic jet engines, and suddenly it starts to accelerate to give a higher energetic impact to the target. Those systems are controlled by very advanced artificial intelligence.  But the fact is that they might not be so suitable weapons as hypersonic aircraft marketed. 

But the hypersonic systems can use to send satellites and space shuttles to the ballistic or suborbital trajectory and that kind of system is suitable for civilian and military purposes.  The hydrogen-powered scramjets can rise the small spacecraft to high altitude, where that craft is turning to use the rocket engines. This kind of hypersonic system doesn't require so much liquid oxygen as regular systems. 

And that thing leaves more room for the payload. Hypersonic aircraft can operate from regular airfields or aircraft carriers. That means that those aircraft can rise airborne from every point of the world. They can use as recon, strike, and ASAT/ABM missions. The small lightweight shuttles can operate also as space fighters. And that is a sad thing because it increases the militarization of space. 

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_SR-72

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...