The best way is how the politician makes sure to confirm the election. Is to ask people what kind of things electors want to hear? Above this text are the data collection methods. But the problem is how to confirm that the opinions that people tell the truth? Confirmation of what people think about those questions is the same way important as collecting data. What do they tell in the interviews? Collecting data is easy, but confirming that data is difficult.
The idea of the election result manipulation is similar to the warehouses, where the automatic systems have connected the merchandise what are going in the same direction to one box. The for the virtual system, the packages are the speeches or programs. And the box is a common destiny, where the people who participate in the operation want to get. The packages are the things that are involving programs.
That people think is important and the box is the master program. The "big program" can be only one world or the line in the thousands of speeches. And that thing is hard to detect. The collection of the data is a very easy process. There can be the form on the Internet. Where people will fill and tell how they are feeling about things, what politicians can give them. There might be some gifts. The purpose of those gifts is to motivate people to fill the forms.
Those gifts can be a bottle of ketchup. That gift is for trouble what people will have when they are filling those forms. And that data can be used to make speeches. The problem is how to get the confirmed data of the opinions of the people. People are filling forms without reading them. And that thing is problematic.
Collecting data from the net is easy, but how to confirm that data? Legally there is no way to make profiles of a certain type of people because there is no way to collect data of the people from different sources. So in the cases that private contractors are making this kind of data handling work, they must just content the data, what the people want to give them.
But collecting a large mass of data by observing things like body language by using web cameras is not legal. The mass and details of the data that is collecting determine how sharp that analysis can be. When people are analyzing what kind of clothes certain types of people are using, they are searching for what kind of clothes the audience of certain musicians is using.
Then they are targeting the marketing to the people by putting those merchandise to music videos. But those things are material goods that are easy to detect. Opinions are seen anywhere. And how to confirm that opinion is real? And is the reported opinion so strong that the person will give the vote to the politician?
They are easy to see from the film. But the opinions are immaterial. The people who are planning the political commercials cannot know what kind of opinions people have of some politicians. If I like the music that Mick Jagger makes, is not the same thing that I would vote that guy for president. The clothes that people are using and the music that they are listening are not the same things, what people think about politics.
Making a marketing campaign for clothes is much easier than make an election campaign for politicians. The opinions cannot be seen or confirmed anywhere. The clothes of the audience of certain bands or musicians are easy to see from films.
There is the possibility that there are send links to the homepages of certain politicians. So the artificial intelligence can use in this process. It can search the time how long people spend on those homepages, and there can be a button "did you like this ?" when a person clicks out from those pages. The problem is that artificial intelligence must have the possibility to separate the users who are clicking the homepages. And also the system should know does the person speaks true things when that person is clicking the "do you like" button.
Image():https://postcourier.com.pg/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/TopStories_04_method-of-collecting-data.jpg
Comments
Post a Comment