Skip to main content

Are we intelligent enough to see the intelligence of our creatures?


When we think that machines are not intelligent, we must find something that supports this thesis. The most usual argument is that we are putting limits on those machines. We are regulating the data what the machine gets and how it uses that data. So the machine cannot become more intelligent than we are, because we can stop it if it gets too much data for use. And that thing could be the worst mistake ever made. 

The creator of that idea didn't probably know about the internet and autonomous machine learning. Nowadays is possible that some algorithm is searching the data and store it. Without the user don't recognize it. And that thing makes the possibility that the machine knows things that the users and programmers are not stored in that system in purpose. 

Can computers be more intelligent than humans? Sometimes people are arguments that the machine cannot be more intelligent than humans by using the argument that humans are created machines, and that's why the machine cannot be more intelligent or smarter than their creators. The case is like can the descendant be more intelligent than their parents. 

Sometimes we are asked, "are we intelligent enough to see the intelligence of other species?". We are living in the "sapiens centric world". That means that we are thinking that there cannot be another intelligent species in the world or even the universe. The SETI program and search for extraterrestrial civilizations is accepted as science. Before that those things were just stories. 


Does the ability to win humans in chess make AI more intelligent than humans?


The thing is that artificial intelligence is winning humans in chess very easily. The new learning machines that can create new tactics and strategies on the chessboard are invincible. Those systems are calculating every each movement of those buttons very effectively. But those systems are also recording tactics that other players are using. That system makes the database by using the game records, and then it can mix those databases for selecting the most effective movements. 

But does that ability make the AI smarter than humans? Are the things like chess the description of intelligence? Or how we are describing the intelligence? The things like making the mathematical or some other formulas or modeling the quantum mechanical rules are sometimes described as "intelligence".

But the people who are working with those kinds of things might not even have a driver's license. That means those people cannot do everything in the world. Even the smartest mind in the world has a limit, is the thing, how we are thinking. Or is there some kind of limit? The theoretical knowledge doesn't necessarily mean. That there is some kind of possibility to make practical solutions to every problem modeled by theorists. And being a good quantum physicist or artificial intelligence researcher doesn't mean that those people are good chess players. 


()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/2021/08/are-we-intelligent-enough-to-see.html

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...
Post a Comment
Read more