Planets don't live forever

Planets don't live forever

The lifetime of planets is limited. When their star will explode in the nova or supernova eruption, some of them will just vaporize. But the lifetime of the planet depends on another thing. The magnetic field, what is keeping the cosmic radiation away from the atmosphere or the core of the planet is not forever. The radioactive material that keeps the nucleus of the planet liquid is ending someday.

That thing means the liquid stone that keeps the nucleus of the planet rotating will turn solid. And when the nucleus of the planet will solidify, the magnetic field and atmosphere are lost. That means that the cosmic radiation will hit the surface of the planet and start to cut the molecules of the planet into pieces. So sooner or later the planet will vaporize anyway even the asteroids or meteorites will not destroy it.

The Earth-size rogue planets might be similar to Earth in the past. But then the eruption of their sun has thrown them away from their solar system.

The Earth-size rocky planet, what travels around the galaxy as the rogue planet tells that the massive eruptions are always happening in other solar systems. The Earth-size rocky planets are interesting because their atmosphere might blow away in those cosmic convulsions. In the past, those rogue planets could be like Earth. But then the eruption of the star has blown them away from their orbiter.

The reason why there are no giant gas planets inside the asteroid belts is that the solar wind will blow the gas away from their core. If Earth would orbit at the trajectory of Uranus, this planet would have an extremely bold atmosphere, and it will look like some gas giant. The fact is that if the atmosphere of the planet is bold, that thing will decrease the radiation level that reaches the surface of the planet. And then the decreasing radiation decreases the possibility of photosynthesis.

The gravity field of those planets is very important because the gravity resists the solar wind, and the large planet would have a bolder atmosphere than smaller planets. If the atmosphere is too thin that is not a very good thing Thin atmosphere that allows infrared radiation but also the meteorites hit the surface of the planet. A planet what gravity is weak can also create a bold atmosphere, but the distance of the planet from the sun would be higher. And bold atmosphere closes the radiation away from the surface

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/how-our-galaxy-will-kill-our-solar-system-in-a-trillion-years-planet-by-planet

https://www.space.com/smallest-rogue-planet-discovery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_planet

Image: https://www.space.com/smallest-rogue-planet-discovery

Comments

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low. The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away. When the box is filled with quantum gas and som

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper? The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown. But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull. The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting armor has

Thoughts about the future, world, and technology

Search This Blog