 |
| . |
Artificial intelligence and generalizing things
The machine imagination
The
virtual simulation that can create the imagination or abstract thinking
for artificial intelligence can be already in here. That ability can
give artificial intelligence an ultimate ability which makes it closer
to humans than ever before.
The computer might have the ability
to make simulated games backward, and that ability can call as "machine
imagination". In the generation process of the tactics, the computer
uses the data, which collected from the opponent's playing style. And
then the computer would play the virtual match against the opponent.
In
that case, the computer would play things like chess backward, that the
user or opponent of the computer would not see, that the system is
creating tactics. But when we are saying that only one man can win the
chess program, we can ask how generalize this thing is? How probable is
that a human player can win the computer if the only winner is the world
champion?
Chess and artificial intelligence
Normally
we are saying that the human is still winning artificial intelligence
in chess. Or modern artificial intelligence with machine learning mode
can always win humans, so that thing is not relevant anymore. But then
we must ask how to generalize the proposition that chess is the game,
what shows that humanity is better than a machine? Have you ever play
chess against a chess program?
It's not very easy, because the
computer can calculate the movements of buttons far away in the future,
and that thing makes winning even the classic chess program, which has
not learned mode very difficult if you are an ordinary person, who would
not play chess all the time. And when the power of the computers
increased, the chess programs turned more complicated, because the
computer can calculate more movements to the future than weak and slow
machines.
The difference between the power of the processors was
easy to see when the same chess program run by using a base PC, which
had 640 kb memory and 086 processor. In that case, many people could win
that program, but when the program moved to the 386-based computer that
computer could calculate so many movements for the buttons, that most
of the people would lose. In the cases where the human met chess program
the only man who won the IBM chess program was Garry Gasparov the
ultimate world champion of chess.
But is the thing, that only one
man can win the artificial intelligence in the chess generalized, that
the entire population can win the artificial intelligence? And then
Gasparov loses to artificial intelligence. The reason was that machine
intelligence had the mode where it collected the data of the game style
of Gasparov.
Then the computer played the simulated chess
matches against the master, and then it was able to create tactics,
which made Gasparov lose. That was open the road to the creation of
machine learning. If the computer would use the virtual simulation of
the game for creating better tactics we can say that computer has
imagination.
How to teach a computer in chess? The key
element is to find many types of opponents for artificial intelligence.
By using this method, it can get as diverse opponents as possible for
creating as diverse as possible tactics.
The
computer might have the ability to make simulated games backward, and
that ability can call as "machine imagination". In the generation
process of the tactics, the computer uses the data, what is collected
from the opponent's playing style, and then the computer would play the
virtual match against the opponent. For creating perfect tactics the
chess computer would need multiple opponents, that it can create diverse
versions of the tactics, and that's why the chess-pages are the
ultimate tool for collecting data for artificial intelligence, what
mission is to win human in that game.
In that case, the computer
would play things like chess backward, that the user or opponent of the
computer would not see, that the system is creating tactics. But when
we are saying that only one man can win the chess program, we can ask
how generalize this thing is? How probable is that a human player can
win the computer if the only winner is the world champion?
Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_chess
Comments
Post a Comment