We want to be hard for ourselves, but can we always be that kind of people?
When we are talking about experience, we must realize that whenever we are facing something, we are getting the experience, what is subjective. This means that there is no way to be objective if a person would participate in something. Experience or object in memory is always the combination of the feelings and materialistic things, and that's why humans in not trustworthy.
And either artificial intelligence is not trustworthy if it will observe something, what is happening like a fight on the streets. Artificial intelligence sees only things, what happens in the front of its sensor, not what happens in the mind of the people, who are taking part in this case, and that is the thing, what people must realize.
When we are getting the information, that is always somehow polarized, and the worst thing, what polarizes information is the persons' mind. If we have done lots of work with something, we are facing the situation, where we "want to be right". When information polarizes in our mind, we are facing the situation, that we cannot notice that thing. We want to believe that we are hard for ourselves, but the problem is that other people might not see things this way, and that causes conflicts.
The problem is that when we are seeing some person, who is dressed like some kind of misuser of alcohol, we automatically conclude that person is some kind of homeless alcoholic. We are making that kind of conclusion when we are seeing people about five seconds, and then that's it. We even don't think that we might be wrong.
In some cases, we are seeing people, who are wearing a wrinkly suit, poplin jacket, and worn shoes. And we are seeing that those persons are alcoholics. And especially if we are doormen of the bar, who are using tough touch in their work, we want to believe that everybody who we are kicking out is homeless alcoholic, because that thing justifies the actions, what we are doing.
This kind of thing is causing, that somebody still wants to believe, that position in society is stable. Because if we are doing something wrong, we certainly want that this person ever becomes our superiority, because that causes a horrible situation in our lives, we probably must answer the question of why we have done that thing?
And if we are doormen in some bar, we can get the question, why we are so tough to some particular alcoholic? The reason why that person tries to come in is probably, that there is another that kind of people, and maybe the reason for tough touch is that the inspectors just gave the warning for breakings the regulations. Maybe the warning was given because of tippling to drunk or noisy people at the front of the bar, and maybe every client in that place is some kind of alcoholic. But who told the owner, that this would be a good way to make business?
Is the owner proud, while walking at the front of the bar, and tell to friends being an owner of some kind of wild west-style saloon, where are the fights at every evening? If we are thinking that some alcohol-addict is drinking beer all day in that place, we must realize that this particular person would probably not be the only that kind of customer, who attends in that place. So other people, who have problems are welcome, but for that person the doorman was tough.
Those people, who attempt to come in are always people, who have no job, and we want to believe that they are in that position for the rest of their life, because if the person would go to school and study to lawyer or economist, that kind of people is dangerous. They can become our bosses and those people might remember the baton of doorman after the studies.
A person cannot be anything else, what we see in front of us, and because we are living here and now, that person must be, what we are seeing. This is the thing in the information polarization. And if we would through that person, who is looking at alcoholic out from the bar, we want to believe, that we are making the right thing. The same idea is in the cases, where we are participating in the fight.
When the police ask the reason, why we are participating in the action, what is illegal, we must realize that we always want to be right. We want to believe that the opponent in this kind of case is a bad person. And when information is stored in our brains polarizes like this, we are in trouble. We want to confess that we are making the right decision if we are giving karate-kick to the head of some homeless alcoholic or the person, who is looking like a homeless alcoholic in our mind.
And in the worst situation, we are seeing the newspaper headlines tomorrow, where reads that the judge of the supreme court has been assaulted. So what we might think in that situation? What makes people think that some person is a homeless alcoholic? The thing is interesting, something has been created the image of homeless alcoholics in the mind of the people. But was the person look like a homeless alcoholic?
What did that person wear, what kind of clothes that person has, did that person smell? And in the worst scenario, that person would be some judge or police officer. In the court those people might ask, are we done this kind of violent action sometimes before? Then lawyers would ask, would we do that thing again, if the person is not police or judge.
When we are talking about experience, we must realize that whenever we are facing something, we are getting the experience, what is subjective. This means that there is no way to be objective if a person would participate in something. Experience or object in memory is always the combination of the feelings and materialistic things, and that's why humans in not trustworthy.
And either artificial intelligence is not trustworthy if it will observe something, what is happening like a fight on the streets. Artificial intelligence sees only things, what happens in the front of its sensor, not what happens in the mind of the people, who are taking part in this case, and that is the thing, what people must realize.
When we are getting the information, that is always somehow polarized, and the worst thing, what polarizes information is the persons' mind. If we have done lots of work with something, we are facing the situation, where we "want to be right". When information polarizes in our mind, we are facing the situation, that we cannot notice that thing. We want to believe that we are hard for ourselves, but the problem is that other people might not see things this way, and that causes conflicts.
The problem is that when we are seeing some person, who is dressed like some kind of misuser of alcohol, we automatically conclude that person is some kind of homeless alcoholic. We are making that kind of conclusion when we are seeing people about five seconds, and then that's it. We even don't think that we might be wrong.
In some cases, we are seeing people, who are wearing a wrinkly suit, poplin jacket, and worn shoes. And we are seeing that those persons are alcoholics. And especially if we are doormen of the bar, who are using tough touch in their work, we want to believe that everybody who we are kicking out is homeless alcoholic, because that thing justifies the actions, what we are doing.
This kind of thing is causing, that somebody still wants to believe, that position in society is stable. Because if we are doing something wrong, we certainly want that this person ever becomes our superiority, because that causes a horrible situation in our lives, we probably must answer the question of why we have done that thing?
And if we are doormen in some bar, we can get the question, why we are so tough to some particular alcoholic? The reason why that person tries to come in is probably, that there is another that kind of people, and maybe the reason for tough touch is that the inspectors just gave the warning for breakings the regulations. Maybe the warning was given because of tippling to drunk or noisy people at the front of the bar, and maybe every client in that place is some kind of alcoholic. But who told the owner, that this would be a good way to make business?
Is the owner proud, while walking at the front of the bar, and tell to friends being an owner of some kind of wild west-style saloon, where are the fights at every evening? If we are thinking that some alcohol-addict is drinking beer all day in that place, we must realize that this particular person would probably not be the only that kind of customer, who attends in that place. So other people, who have problems are welcome, but for that person the doorman was tough.
Those people, who attempt to come in are always people, who have no job, and we want to believe that they are in that position for the rest of their life, because if the person would go to school and study to lawyer or economist, that kind of people is dangerous. They can become our bosses and those people might remember the baton of doorman after the studies.
A person cannot be anything else, what we see in front of us, and because we are living here and now, that person must be, what we are seeing. This is the thing in the information polarization. And if we would through that person, who is looking at alcoholic out from the bar, we want to believe, that we are making the right thing. The same idea is in the cases, where we are participating in the fight.
When the police ask the reason, why we are participating in the action, what is illegal, we must realize that we always want to be right. We want to believe that the opponent in this kind of case is a bad person. And when information is stored in our brains polarizes like this, we are in trouble. We want to confess that we are making the right decision if we are giving karate-kick to the head of some homeless alcoholic or the person, who is looking like a homeless alcoholic in our mind.
And in the worst situation, we are seeing the newspaper headlines tomorrow, where reads that the judge of the supreme court has been assaulted. So what we might think in that situation? What makes people think that some person is a homeless alcoholic? The thing is interesting, something has been created the image of homeless alcoholics in the mind of the people. But was the person look like a homeless alcoholic?
What did that person wear, what kind of clothes that person has, did that person smell? And in the worst scenario, that person would be some judge or police officer. In the court those people might ask, are we done this kind of violent action sometimes before? Then lawyers would ask, would we do that thing again, if the person is not police or judge.
Comments
Post a Comment