Skip to main content

The speed of light again

The speed of light again

The reason, why we are thinking that nothing can cross the speed of light is that we do no possible opportunities to make a rocket, what jet would travel faster than the speed of light. Only photons and electrons can create the exhaust, what speed is the speed of light, so we cannot just break the cosmic speed limit by thinking that way. There are two ways to make the virtual crossing of that speed.

1) The first method works only if the escaping velocity of the surface of the particle is higher than the speed of light. So for working that thing needs a black hole, where the craft can be driven. 

In the first case, we can drive our rocket straight to the black hole, and check, what happens behind the event horizon. The speed that we should use is extremely high, and we should have the photon rocket for that mission.

The thing is that the impact speed of the spacecraft should be near the speed of light when it would impact to the event horizon, or the crew would scratch in pieces. And after that the thing, what would happen is that the escaping velocity of the black hole crosses the speed of the light. That is the reason, why we are calling that thing as the black hole. Even the light cannot escape from the black hole.

2) Rising the impact speed between particles higher than the speed of light. So when two particles like electron and positron would travel the opposite way in the particle accelerator the impact speed of those particles is higher than the speed of the light. (Speed of particle 1+ Speed of particle 2)

The second way to cross natural laws is just pulling the particles of the plasma to the craft, which travels extremely high speed, which is near the speed of the light. That means that the speed of the hypothetical spacecraft would travel let's say 50% of the speed of light, and the particles are pulling against is by using the force, what would be something like 80-90% of the speed of the light. That means that the impact speed between the craft and plasma is higher than the speed of the light, and that thing is called the relative crossing the speed of the light. But what effect that thing would have to the things, what happens inside the craft? This is the idea of WARP.

The WARP would just pull the plasma inside it, and then it would shoot the ion jet against that flow, what is hoped to stretch the universe. The thing in those ideas is that we cannot just break the natural laws, but we can go around them. There are two ways to make WARP-effect. The first is to make WARP-engine, and the second is to drive the spacecraft to the direction of the sun by using high speed. In the natural WARP system, the solar wind would allow the spacecraft impact with particles by using the impact speed, which is faster than light (Speed of craft + speed of incoming plasma). But does that thing affect things, what happens inside the craft? That's a different thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...