Skip to main content

Is antimatter one state of matter, or should we handle it as in some other thing?


 


Is antimatter one state of matter, or should we handle it as in some other thing? 

At first, I must say that the list of states of matter is very hard to complete because at first, we should describe the state of matter, and what means material? If we are thinking material as the group of primary particles, we must ask, should we calculate also quarks, Higgs bosons, superstrings, photons, and other things as matter? 

Are quarks the state of matter, when they are forming the quark stars, or is fullerene one of the states of matter? It is one of the states of carbon atoms, but because of it's unique chemical qualities. This is a hard question. 

____________________________________________________________________________

If antimatter is one of the states of matter, that means that the number of lists of the states of matter is double of this list of the states of matter. Are there over 20 different states of matter?

1: Solid

2: Liquid

3: Gas

4: Ion or plasmatic

5: Buse-Einstein condensate

6: Neutrons, when they are forming neutron stars

7: Quarks when they are forming quark stars

8: Dark matter

9: Singularity matter, what forms the Black Holes

10: Could the energy be one form of matter?

11: Could also hypothetical tachyon-particles one of the states of the matter

12: Could there be some kind of chaotic form of the matter, what is existing in the highest levels of energy. And the great mass of this chaotic form could exist in the young and very hot universe. 

... and their antiparticles, what doubles the list. So can we ever make the complete list of the states of the matter? 

____________________________________________________________________________

This seems a very interesting thing, because even if antimatter is the mirror-material, what will annihilate or turns to energy when it touches with "normal matter".  But if the mirror-particles would not touch together, antimatter doesn't differ anyway from "normal matter". 

And here the words "normal matter" are written between the quotes, because we are calling the state of matter, where we are living as the "matter" and it's mirror particles "antimatter". So if we are making the induction thought, the matter means particle groups, which have certain polarities. 

But the fact is that the tests, what are made in the particle accelerators have caused question, is there some chaotic state of matter? Or is the high-temperature quark-gluon soup, what formed the young universe, before even the first atoms were formed just after the Big Bang, and before quarks were connected to protons and neutrons as one of the states of matter? 

And then we are facing things like neutrinos and mesons, we must ask are those things also some kind of matter? Or are photons state of matter too? Even if photon doesn't have mass, that thing can transfer energy to every other particle. So at this point, we must say, that we cannot probably ever make the list of the states of matter complete. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...