Skip to main content

Are we all creative and individual persons?




Are we all creative and individual persons?

Does school kill creativity and individualism? That is one of the most interesting questions in the world. The thing is that people need skills, what they are learning at school. So the school is really important for people because in that place we are learning social and other skills. And maybe "killing creativity" means that some people would not dare to bring their abilities in front of other people, and they are hiding the ideas that they are created themselves. 

There are many stories, that we are all intelligent and creative individuals until we will go to school, and there happens something, that destroys that thing, what we are calling individualism. The thing is that being productive and individual means that a person is also different than others. And this is the reason, why some people would not have the chance to bring their individualism out of their personality. In this theory, people who want to be individuals would not bring that ability to other people's knowledge, because they are afraid of cheaters. 

Is this true or false? The thing is that there are many people, who misunderstand this kind of thing, and say that people should not even go to school. This is one of the greatest misunderstandings of that kind of thing. Schools are really good places to learn social skills and other kinds of things, and when we are talking about education, it is giving tools to handle things. 

Social skills are not the thing, that we should always mention, but they are an effective tool in the control of life. If we are creative and individual people, who are creating something individual, we must also have the ability to follow rules and norms, what society is giving to us. There is nothing to shame if a person would want to make productive things, but there are always people, who are jealous of that kind of thing. 

So when we are thinking about Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, we must realize that those persons were extreme examples of the individualists, whose inventions changed the world. The thing is that those men were only two inventors, who made extraordinary things during their life. There are many other inventors, who were made many other things, which are similar way important as the inventions, what those people made. 

And when we are thinking that some of those persons are ever been at schools, we must realize that the school history of those persons might be destroyed, because of national security. That makes impossible to track those people by following their school history, but the destroyer of those papers is sometimes unknown. 

There is told many tales that Nikola Tesla ever went to school, but if you read the personal history of Tesla you mean that this person was in school (1). So, in this case, claiming that school destroys creativity has nothing to do with this case. The thing is that in school people can share their ideas with others, and that makes possible to advance and refine the idea. And maybe some of the ideas would turn true products.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...