. |
Image I
One thing about UFO-sightings, retrocausality, and alien signals
The UFO doesn't mean the alien or rather saying extraterrestrial craft. So the UFO means "unidentified flying objects", which might be something like returnable stealth satellites, stealth aircraft, or some top-secret experimental systems or simply aircraft, or lighter than air vehicle like an airship, what we cannot identify. There is the possibility that some NRO top-secret stealth satellites will return to the ground after their missions. There is only little data about satellites called "Misty"(1) but some UFO sightings might have a connection with that satellite, and we know that saucer-shape is a perfect stealth form for the body of stealth craft.
Above this text is footage that is claimed to portray the UFO. There is a possibility that this kind of effect can do by using plasma and hologram. In this case, the plasma would have the same polarity as the radar impulses that causes the radar echo, and the hologram makes the effect looking like a "physical object".
Maybe USAF has this kind of system to make false targets for enemy missiles, that the recon aircraft or satellites can capture the signals of the aiming system of that missiles, that the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) or some other operators can create the counter-algorithm for that system. Sometimes those pseudo-UFOs are used for turning the people's eyes off the secretive systems like stealth aircraft.
People have the right to believe if there are reports in some scientific journals. If Scientific American reports some kind of mystery signals captured by some radio telescopes, people have the right to believe that kind of article. If somebody makes them for a joke they are not so good jokes as they think. We see things like retrocausality(3) where today affects to past. That thing means the future and past are interacting, we might say that this thing gives the theoretical possibility to change the past or maybe travel to there?
The UFO might be one of the most interesting phenomena and one of the most interesting things is that some people need to prove that the UFO:s are like a region. They are saying that people who are believing those things are so-called schizo-type personalities(4), which means that those people are somehow maniac or need some kind of psychiatric medicine. So if we are thinking about the schizo-type personalities and their extraordinary ideas, we might take some book of history, and take the nice little list of the researchers and inventors who might be somehow different than regular people.
. |
Image II: Pinterest
The people from Leonardo da Vinci to Thomas Alva Edison, Nikola Tesla to J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Albert Einstein, John Nash, and Edward Teller might be Schizo-type personalities. And as we see from the historical places like Los Alamos national laboratories and other kinds of things. Those research places might look like being full of schizophrenic workers. People who have extraordinary thoughts and ideas are easy to stamp as maniacs.
But when we are seeing people like Elon Musk, we might remember when they established their companies. People believed that those people were crazy, but those ideas took the air below their wings. And today those people are respected or at least wealthy men. So how ordinary person Elon Musk is? Maybe that kind of person is living next door to you.
And this thing is really sad. I know what I see when I look at things on the Internet. If somebody makes deep-fakes, there is some kind of UFO there is no shame to believe those things. You cannot separate the real image from deep fakes that are made by using advanced image manipulation programs. So if a person believes the UFO image, in that case, we might say that person might not so schizo as we might think.
But what if the image that people are seeing is marked by the air force and captured by a jet-fighter, should I have the right to believe that kind of data real? Should I have the right to believe that USAF would somehow comment on those images if they are faked or ask to remove them from the Internet? Should they somehow follow, who uses their markings and where those markings are used, and warn people if there is some kind of disinformation going on in their name?
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misty_(satellite)
(2) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/alien-hunters-discover-mysterious-signal-from-proxima-centauri/
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality
(4) https://www.sciencealert.com/an-astronomer-who-believes-in-aliens-explains-why-he-s-not-convinced-by-ufo-sightings
Image I https://www.abc.net.au/cm/rimage/12192844-1x1-xlarge.jpg?v=2
https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/10/one-thing-about-ufo-sightings-retrocausality-and-alien-signals/
Comments
Post a Comment