The empty hole in the clouds and the frozen bird in the painting

The empty hole in the clouds and the frozen bird in the painting

When the researcher of art makes the job, the primary purpose of that person is to get in the ming or thoughts, what the artist would think, while making that work. This thing might seem really easy, but there are many things, which makes the practical solution quite difficult. When we are thinking about some extraordinary artists, we might realize that the images are not forming automatically.

That means that the artists must give time, willing and knowledgeable to the job, and the thing is that the extraordinary and interesting paintings are very highly qualified in the point of view of the technical quality of painting, and in those images, the artists have put their skills and time for the work. But then we must realize that every painting is symbolic. The symbols are launching the reaction in the brains, that the image is forming on the canvas or paper.

And the major idea of painting is the result depends only on the skills and will of the artist. This is the thing, what makes creative work really difficult. The thing is that if the artist would not want to make the job, there would not be the results on the paper or canvas or anywhere else if that person would not want to make the work.

Is the bird symbolizing the imagination in the painting "La Grande Famille", what is painted by René Magritte in the year 1963?

There is a very interesting detail of the painting of the bird. René Magritte gave that painting the name "La Grande Famille" ("The Great Family"), but I cannot see a family in this painting. Of course, the bird is frozen in time, but why Magritte gave that name to the image? He could name it by "The great bird" or "The Bird at the time". So where he saw the family? Is the bird the symbol about the thing, what is always present, but we can ever touch it? We all can know that the bird is exist, but nobody is allowing to own the bird. So could this painting symbolize the imagination and abstract way to think about things?

The thing is that every artist have interesting works, and also my new favorite René Magritte has many interesting products. And one of them is a series of paintings, where the man or some living object seems to have another space or reality inside them. The bird is like something, what is scratched or moved from another reality, and transfer to the reality, what was observed by Magritte. The result in this painting seems like some STEALTH-aircraft, what visual stealth-system would be jam, and it shows the image, what is not making thing invisible.

But as you see, Magritte did not make the images just from images, what comes from inside the conscious of his mind. Maybe he created the image by using the cloud formations, what are in another image as the model. That kind of formations or forms, where seems to have aircraft-looking hole in the middle of the clouds are really interesting. But are they only the coincidence? This kind of questions might interested Magritte, and we must remember that the UFO-sightings of Belgium happened years after the painting of this portrait. So why Magritte paint that painting?

Was he mean something, what that man didn't want to tell other people? But as we know what kind of things made sure that the USA has got super-secret aircraft, what is unable to detect by using radar. But the STEALTH attack aircraft  F-117, what is officially the first STEALTH aircraft in the history of USA flew officially ten years after the painting of Magritte. So was he see something, what officials didn't want to tell people? And was this the program of the F-117, or something more interesting? Or is this image only the coincidence or product of imagination?