Psychopolitics and public media
As I recently wrote the term "psychopolitics" means that the leaders of the state and organization are controlled by giving them information about public opinions. And the best and the most effective way to collect the information to those people is use Gallup polls, what are normally trusted method to collect data from the large mass of people.
Gallup polls can be made by using phone calls or sending forms or questions to people by using social media or e-mail. The Gallup polls can be faked by using two methods. One and the simplest is that the researcher just invents the numbers from the head and after that sends the faked data to the customer.
This thing is really easy to uncover because of the lack of telephone calls uncovers that the research is undone. And the other version is to manipulate the results by selecting people, whose opinion is supporting the manipulator's opinion. When we are thinking people, whose career depends on some specific person, we might choose those people for targets of the Gallup polls.
And that means that those people would want that the person, who is still in control continues in that role. This kind of things are really good points, but they are not normally mentioned in the public media. But in public media is also a very interesting way to act, if somebody is disliked by the public journalists or some public organization.
That is that the person, who is not tolerated just stamped as the pseudoscientist and all work, what that person has been done is some kind of "joke". And at this point, the thing is that the persons, who prosecute those "not wanted persons" are starting to play pathetic. Because of their high age or sickness, they should not even be targeted to the research.
Sometimes the public media claims that the aging of the homicides is something like 20 years, what is not true. Because if that kind of things would be true, the person who can hide the law 20 years would be freed. And that kind of things is totally not tolerated. And in some cases, the person who has been the leader of the criminal gang or organization has been playing real benefactor.
One of those people has been Pablo Escobar, the leader of the Medellin drug cartel, who offered the state of Columbia the billion dollars, that they would release that man. The idea of that kind of publishing is to tell that the investigations would be unnecessary, and the judgments would not give anyway.
And even today is not sure, was Escobar the real leader of that cartel, because his lifestyle and way to use cocaine were so intensive, that most of the time that man was in another dimension. Also, Escobar almost choked, because sniffed cocaine full his lugs, and that means that the leadership of that man slipped in other hands. So when the use of cocaine was not under the control somebody takes to control the organization of Escobar.
Sometimes there were tales, that the bank accounts, what were claimed to owned by Escobar, were under the control of some other people, and Escobar was only the high-ranking but not leading actor in that complicated case, what ended, when a sniper shot that man in Colombia during the siege. And somebody claims that the hands of Escobar were high, but there is no evidence about that thing.
Sometimes there is also a very interesting tool in the cases, where "one person dirties the reputation of the big group". That is that if that group sacrifices one of its members, that would satisfy the need for blood. That thing has been seen in the many "cold murder cases", where the suspects are defending, that they have high age. Those things are visible also in the cases when some members of the 1950's motorcycle gangs are prosecuted because of homicide.
As I recently wrote the term "psychopolitics" means that the leaders of the state and organization are controlled by giving them information about public opinions. And the best and the most effective way to collect the information to those people is use Gallup polls, what are normally trusted method to collect data from the large mass of people.
Gallup polls can be made by using phone calls or sending forms or questions to people by using social media or e-mail. The Gallup polls can be faked by using two methods. One and the simplest is that the researcher just invents the numbers from the head and after that sends the faked data to the customer.
This thing is really easy to uncover because of the lack of telephone calls uncovers that the research is undone. And the other version is to manipulate the results by selecting people, whose opinion is supporting the manipulator's opinion. When we are thinking people, whose career depends on some specific person, we might choose those people for targets of the Gallup polls.
And that means that those people would want that the person, who is still in control continues in that role. This kind of things are really good points, but they are not normally mentioned in the public media. But in public media is also a very interesting way to act, if somebody is disliked by the public journalists or some public organization.
That is that the person, who is not tolerated just stamped as the pseudoscientist and all work, what that person has been done is some kind of "joke". And at this point, the thing is that the persons, who prosecute those "not wanted persons" are starting to play pathetic. Because of their high age or sickness, they should not even be targeted to the research.
Sometimes the public media claims that the aging of the homicides is something like 20 years, what is not true. Because if that kind of things would be true, the person who can hide the law 20 years would be freed. And that kind of things is totally not tolerated. And in some cases, the person who has been the leader of the criminal gang or organization has been playing real benefactor.
One of those people has been Pablo Escobar, the leader of the Medellin drug cartel, who offered the state of Columbia the billion dollars, that they would release that man. The idea of that kind of publishing is to tell that the investigations would be unnecessary, and the judgments would not give anyway.
And even today is not sure, was Escobar the real leader of that cartel, because his lifestyle and way to use cocaine were so intensive, that most of the time that man was in another dimension. Also, Escobar almost choked, because sniffed cocaine full his lugs, and that means that the leadership of that man slipped in other hands. So when the use of cocaine was not under the control somebody takes to control the organization of Escobar.
Sometimes there were tales, that the bank accounts, what were claimed to owned by Escobar, were under the control of some other people, and Escobar was only the high-ranking but not leading actor in that complicated case, what ended, when a sniper shot that man in Colombia during the siege. And somebody claims that the hands of Escobar were high, but there is no evidence about that thing.
Sometimes there is also a very interesting tool in the cases, where "one person dirties the reputation of the big group". That is that if that group sacrifices one of its members, that would satisfy the need for blood. That thing has been seen in the many "cold murder cases", where the suspects are defending, that they have high age. Those things are visible also in the cases when some members of the 1950's motorcycle gangs are prosecuted because of homicide.
Comments
Post a Comment