When does the state turn to serve the individual?
For some philosophers, the state is thing what is above all, and the reason for that is that the state has established to serve people. So the people of the state must serve the state. In this philosophical hypothesis, both sides of the relationship between the state and individual persons would both get the benefit of this relationship, where the state protects the individual and for that process, each individual must give their stakes.
This is one way to say, that the state is above all. The reason for that might be some people thought that the apple of power was actually the hand grenade, what could kill everybody, who was against the king. If the king was angry, that person could use the hand grenade.
The words of the philosophers have been searched and researched for hundreds of years. And still, nobody doesn't know, what exactly those people thought or what they meant when they wrote their thoughts. There are always thoughts that some philosopher has meant, what that inmate wrote.
That means that the thing is seen in their texts, there might be many meanings in their writings, and sometimes I have thought, how much those great persons could be written, if they have not written their ideas to paper? When we are thinking about things like the relationship between an individual and the state, those texts causes strong feelings even today.
And if they would be found in 18th. century, that might cause a very dangerous situation. So what would Voltaire do with network-based publication tools? When we are thinking about the role of the individual in the state, we might find the level, where the state starts to be one man.
The idea of that has been copied from the famous phrase, what Luis XIV said once. "I'm the state" would be a very interesting way to rule the country. That makes the ruler unlimited user of power. But there is one little thing, and that is that what if the state loses the war? Would the king have anything, why other people leave that man alive?
The king is in the middle of the state, and that person cannot escape if the war goes bad way, and henchmen tell always, that the king has given every order int the state. And they afraid that the king would punish them if they would not follow the orders, and one of the best explanations is that some of those henchmen believed, that the apple of power was the hand grenade, what the ruler would use against the henchmen. Was that true or false, that thing is unknown.
For some philosophers, the state is thing what is above all, and the reason for that is that the state has established to serve people. So the people of the state must serve the state. In this philosophical hypothesis, both sides of the relationship between the state and individual persons would both get the benefit of this relationship, where the state protects the individual and for that process, each individual must give their stakes.
This is one way to say, that the state is above all. The reason for that might be some people thought that the apple of power was actually the hand grenade, what could kill everybody, who was against the king. If the king was angry, that person could use the hand grenade.
The words of the philosophers have been searched and researched for hundreds of years. And still, nobody doesn't know, what exactly those people thought or what they meant when they wrote their thoughts. There are always thoughts that some philosopher has meant, what that inmate wrote.
That means that the thing is seen in their texts, there might be many meanings in their writings, and sometimes I have thought, how much those great persons could be written, if they have not written their ideas to paper? When we are thinking about things like the relationship between an individual and the state, those texts causes strong feelings even today.
And if they would be found in 18th. century, that might cause a very dangerous situation. So what would Voltaire do with network-based publication tools? When we are thinking about the role of the individual in the state, we might find the level, where the state starts to be one man.
The idea of that has been copied from the famous phrase, what Luis XIV said once. "I'm the state" would be a very interesting way to rule the country. That makes the ruler unlimited user of power. But there is one little thing, and that is that what if the state loses the war? Would the king have anything, why other people leave that man alive?
The king is in the middle of the state, and that person cannot escape if the war goes bad way, and henchmen tell always, that the king has given every order int the state. And they afraid that the king would punish them if they would not follow the orders, and one of the best explanations is that some of those henchmen believed, that the apple of power was the hand grenade, what the ruler would use against the henchmen. Was that true or false, that thing is unknown.
Comments
Post a Comment