The meaningless thing might have meaning

The meaningless thing might have meaning

The first in this text is taken in the old city in Tallinn, Estonia, and as you see, there seems to be something wrong, and the reason why I took this picture, is that the wooden house is in the very bad condition. So why the city authorities would not order to fix that house is interesting. The thing is that this kind of places is really expensive places to live, and why somebody would leave the house in that condition.

The other houses seem very good repaired and kept, and the thing is, why this house has gone in so bad condition? I think that the taxes should pay anyway, even if the house is not in use, but maybe there is some reason, why the owner doesn't care about that house, what locates in the historical city area.

The Gauss curve in the houses

The second image is portraying the Western Harbor of Helsinki, and the nice detail of this house or passenger terminal is the Gauss curve on the roof. This form is the same what the calculations of the averages would give in mathematics. The mean would give that form, and sometimes I have thought, why the form of the average curve is in this house?

Of course, the  Gauss curve is the beautiful form, and the thing is that the politicians need that curve, when they are calculating so-called average person. And the second thing, what the Gauss curve tells for the specialists is some test too easy or too difficult. In the normal scenario is that the test results would follow the graph of the average values, which means that if the real results are different from the Gauss curve, that thing means the test was too difficult or too easy.

If the number of failed is rising, the test would be too easy. And if the number of excellent results would be raised, the test was too easy. But when we are thinking the averages, we must realize, that we should compare the results of all places, where the test has been made, and if there is only one anomaly, that would mean that there is something different in the group, or somebody has been given the answers to a certain group. The last one would be very clear, but the investigator should think, why those results have been given to a certain group?