Using genetic data in working life
This is a very big moral and ethic problem because genomes are telling many things about ourselves, what we even don't want to know. Genetic data tells if the person has mental illness or problems with concentration, which means disorders like ADHD, and this would face many ethical problems in front of our eyes.
The biggest problem is that who has the right to get that data in the hands and is it legal to deny the workplace if the person has concentration problems, what has nothing to do with the mental illnesses? Or should the responsibility of that thing keep in the hands of the Government, what would tell to company, that it must not hire some person, because the genomes would involve this and that mistakes.
This writing is meant for the provocation, so don't take this seriously. But I sometimes don't understand, what is the privacy, if people don't care it anyway. And is it better than people are telling rumors than hear the fact-based data? Why our medical files are classified, but every person in the world can get very personal data of persons medical condition by watching the driver's license or ID-papers, and in fact, in the old communal bus tickets have been visible if a person is incompetent because the group of sale what was used in those tickets was reserved only for that group of users of those tickets.
Or if the person would have some genetic disorder, what would influence that inmate to the drug or another kind of addiction tell that thing in the workplace, that everybody knows to avoid the drinking alcohol in the workplace. Here I'm writing about a thing, that people are telling, that people should speak freely about their illnesses, and in this point of view, people should not hide things, that they have some illness or other disorder in their genomes.
That thing is not their fault, and why they should hide those things. People are telling many times that they have cardiac problems, and that thing can risk their own lives because somebody can steal their nitro package. And that can cause death. Those people would not have a thing to hide in their problems and other people will always understand them.
So that brings one very interesting thing in my mind. Why people should not be open and allow to speak freely about other illnesses. That would make life better, and when people are talking about sickness, they should know the rest of that thing. Why the mental hospital patient should hide that thing even more than some cardiac patient.
Modern medical science has explained that mental illnesses like psychosis and schizophrenia are caused by the wrong level of dopamine or some other neural transmitter or wrong networking of the neurons. So why they have not tolerated symptoms, but things like liver cirrhosis or peptic ulcer are. If we think that the symptoms those illnesses are harmless, the answer is that they are both very painful diseases.
And the origin of those diseases is often the lifestyle. Of course, some bacteria cause many times those diseases. But sometimes the wrong nutrient causes that thing. In fact, those accepted diseases cause problems in working life, as well as the non-accepted diseases. And this is one point of view about the thing, should people tell about their conditions to the employer and every other people in the world.
That's why because the working partners are often first persons, who see the symptoms of the diseases are they physical or psychiatric before team leaders and superiorities. So why we don't wear the skirt or carry pieces of jewelry, where is the list of our diseases, that every person knows, what is wrong with us?
In that case, the most effective way to share that data is to equip people with the RFID-implants, what people can scan every time when they are walking near other people. And if the person would not have smartphones, there could be desks where the person would read other people RFID if own mobile telephone is not in hand.
Those systems can put in the cash of the supermarket, and maybe that will end the stories, what are told in the cash line about the medical condition of some person. That denies the misuse or selling that data because everybody would get the information of another person medical situation by scanning the RFID-chip inside their bodies.
This is a very big moral and ethic problem because genomes are telling many things about ourselves, what we even don't want to know. Genetic data tells if the person has mental illness or problems with concentration, which means disorders like ADHD, and this would face many ethical problems in front of our eyes.
The biggest problem is that who has the right to get that data in the hands and is it legal to deny the workplace if the person has concentration problems, what has nothing to do with the mental illnesses? Or should the responsibility of that thing keep in the hands of the Government, what would tell to company, that it must not hire some person, because the genomes would involve this and that mistakes.
This writing is meant for the provocation, so don't take this seriously. But I sometimes don't understand, what is the privacy, if people don't care it anyway. And is it better than people are telling rumors than hear the fact-based data? Why our medical files are classified, but every person in the world can get very personal data of persons medical condition by watching the driver's license or ID-papers, and in fact, in the old communal bus tickets have been visible if a person is incompetent because the group of sale what was used in those tickets was reserved only for that group of users of those tickets.
Or if the person would have some genetic disorder, what would influence that inmate to the drug or another kind of addiction tell that thing in the workplace, that everybody knows to avoid the drinking alcohol in the workplace. Here I'm writing about a thing, that people are telling, that people should speak freely about their illnesses, and in this point of view, people should not hide things, that they have some illness or other disorder in their genomes.
That thing is not their fault, and why they should hide those things. People are telling many times that they have cardiac problems, and that thing can risk their own lives because somebody can steal their nitro package. And that can cause death. Those people would not have a thing to hide in their problems and other people will always understand them.
So that brings one very interesting thing in my mind. Why people should not be open and allow to speak freely about other illnesses. That would make life better, and when people are talking about sickness, they should know the rest of that thing. Why the mental hospital patient should hide that thing even more than some cardiac patient.
Modern medical science has explained that mental illnesses like psychosis and schizophrenia are caused by the wrong level of dopamine or some other neural transmitter or wrong networking of the neurons. So why they have not tolerated symptoms, but things like liver cirrhosis or peptic ulcer are. If we think that the symptoms those illnesses are harmless, the answer is that they are both very painful diseases.
And the origin of those diseases is often the lifestyle. Of course, some bacteria cause many times those diseases. But sometimes the wrong nutrient causes that thing. In fact, those accepted diseases cause problems in working life, as well as the non-accepted diseases. And this is one point of view about the thing, should people tell about their conditions to the employer and every other people in the world.
That's why because the working partners are often first persons, who see the symptoms of the diseases are they physical or psychiatric before team leaders and superiorities. So why we don't wear the skirt or carry pieces of jewelry, where is the list of our diseases, that every person knows, what is wrong with us?
In that case, the most effective way to share that data is to equip people with the RFID-implants, what people can scan every time when they are walking near other people. And if the person would not have smartphones, there could be desks where the person would read other people RFID if own mobile telephone is not in hand.
Those systems can put in the cash of the supermarket, and maybe that will end the stories, what are told in the cash line about the medical condition of some person. That denies the misuse or selling that data because everybody would get the information of another person medical situation by scanning the RFID-chip inside their bodies.
Comments
Post a Comment