Skip to main content

The AI can be the next Einstein.


"Physicists have developed a new method to detect extremely low-frequency gravitational waves, potentially illuminating the early universe and the nature of supermassive black holes. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Unlocking the Universe’s Deepest Rhythms With Gravitational Waves)



AI can probably make the next theories in physics. The reason for that is all empiric theories must be based on observations. Making theories and models is easy, but proving them is difficult. Observations determine if the theory is accepted or not. The problem with observations is that. 

There is a limited number of large-size telescopes. And if researchers want to use things like gravitational waves to see things what happens inside a black hole's event horizon. They must collect information about gravity waves. And that happens by measuring gravity wave interaction with other wave movement types. That requires that the dataset can be collected from multiple wavelength observations. 


The AI makes it possible to combine data from multiple sources.  All computers calculate better than humans. 


The AI can calculate precise points. When things like black holes or neutron stars collide. At that point the optical systems, radio telescopes, neutrino sensors, and gravity wave sensors to observe those events. That allows the system to create datasets from different systems. The dataset can work as a tool for making new models for particles' internal and external interactions and the shape of the material. 

Theory and thinking are the same thing. When we create new theories, we create new thoughts. In that process, we must reshape the dataset that we have. In this case, the dataset is like a puzzle, and the researcher must collect pieces that they have to the entirety. 

Things like the Theory of General relativity and quantum theories are the top in the series that began with Newton's gravity model. When new observation tools replace older ones. That thing means theories turn to models. Otherwise, theories can proven as wrong. 

The problem with new theories and models is that some people think that some old models are dear to them. If some model has been a cornerstone of the science for over a hundred years it feels hard to deny that model. When researchers create theoretical models they must collect lots of information from books. 

Or confirmed material that is collected about some topics.  There are models. That we learn at elementary schools. The AI doesn't have an emotional attitude for that kind of thing. The AI isn't afraid to deny models if they are wrong. This makes the AI more effective thing than humans. 



https://scitechdaily.com/ai-unlocks-the-secrets-of-dark-energy-in-groundbreaking-study/


https://scitechdaily.com/the-next-einstein-new-ai-can-develop-new-theories-of-physics/


https://scitechdaily.com/unlocking-the-universes-deepest-rhythms-with-gravitational-waves/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...
Post a Comment
Read more