One very strange thing about Russian weapons
Why the USA didn't create the own copy of AK-47?
Everybody knows that the best assault rifle in the world was Soviet or Russian AK-47. That weapon was claimed to be far better than M-16 or some other NATO assault rifle. But the question is, "why the USA didn't make its own copy about this legendary weapon?". In this part, I must ask the same question about the other Russian weapons, which might be superior to western weapons.
Why the western world doesn't make own copy of those weapons like SS-18 FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System)-weapon, what can attack at any point on the Earth by using nuclear weapons. What is the thing, that makes those weapons impossible to copy, or is there some secrets, what the US government and NATO doesn't want people to know?
What is the thing, what makes the western world being quiet about some weapons?
When we are thinking about things like hypersonic cruise missiles, we are facing the thing, that the western world would not say a word about those weapons. HCS (Hypersonic Cruise Missile) systems might be more lethal than we ever think, and there is not a single word about those systems in places like the United Nations. And nobody actually says a thing about the Chinese projects, what is containing the information about the attempt to make the cruise missiles, what might cross the speed of Mach 7.
The thing is that those missiles would equip with RAT (Rapid Air Turbine) what would give energy to the microwave transmitter, what will give high-energy microwave burst to the target. That high power microwave radiation would melt the targeted warship or some other things. And the high-speed cruise missile would destroy the target also by using the kinetic energy. This means that the system would not need a separated warhead, the impact energy of the very fast missile would terminate the target.
The reason for that might be an attempt to hide something, what is far more devastating and dangerous than the HCS. But what that system might be? There is of course theories, that the western world would not want to show the things, where they have a lack of knowledge, and the thing is that Atlas or Delta type commercial rockets can also carry nuclear weapons to the orbiting trajectory.
Those things might be similar to the Russian and Chinese weapons, and there is the only couple of changes, which might be changed in those rockets, that they are suitable for the FOBS missions. One of the deadliest version of HCS is that those cruise missiles would shoot to the orbiting trajectory, and then they can dive back to the atmosphere.
Why the USA didn't create the own copy of AK-47?
Everybody knows that the best assault rifle in the world was Soviet or Russian AK-47. That weapon was claimed to be far better than M-16 or some other NATO assault rifle. But the question is, "why the USA didn't make its own copy about this legendary weapon?". In this part, I must ask the same question about the other Russian weapons, which might be superior to western weapons.
Why the western world doesn't make own copy of those weapons like SS-18 FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System)-weapon, what can attack at any point on the Earth by using nuclear weapons. What is the thing, that makes those weapons impossible to copy, or is there some secrets, what the US government and NATO doesn't want people to know?
What is the thing, what makes the western world being quiet about some weapons?
When we are thinking about things like hypersonic cruise missiles, we are facing the thing, that the western world would not say a word about those weapons. HCS (Hypersonic Cruise Missile) systems might be more lethal than we ever think, and there is not a single word about those systems in places like the United Nations. And nobody actually says a thing about the Chinese projects, what is containing the information about the attempt to make the cruise missiles, what might cross the speed of Mach 7.
The thing is that those missiles would equip with RAT (Rapid Air Turbine) what would give energy to the microwave transmitter, what will give high-energy microwave burst to the target. That high power microwave radiation would melt the targeted warship or some other things. And the high-speed cruise missile would destroy the target also by using the kinetic energy. This means that the system would not need a separated warhead, the impact energy of the very fast missile would terminate the target.
The reason for that might be an attempt to hide something, what is far more devastating and dangerous than the HCS. But what that system might be? There is of course theories, that the western world would not want to show the things, where they have a lack of knowledge, and the thing is that Atlas or Delta type commercial rockets can also carry nuclear weapons to the orbiting trajectory.
Those things might be similar to the Russian and Chinese weapons, and there is the only couple of changes, which might be changed in those rockets, that they are suitable for the FOBS missions. One of the deadliest version of HCS is that those cruise missiles would shoot to the orbiting trajectory, and then they can dive back to the atmosphere.
Comments
Post a Comment