Indirect cyber attack means cyber attacks targeted somewhere else than into the operative systems in the civil or military infrastructure. Brexit is one lesson that so-called indirect cyber attacks can cause. What if those methods used in Brexit would use in the election where the main theme was divorcing NATO?
Would that thing bring separation from NATO? Theoretically, the answer is "yes". There is the possibility that people will not read the list of the goals that some political movement has. And then they will vote for people who want to divorce from NATO.
We are protecting our military system against cyber attacks. But have we protected things like the decision-making system against the outcoming effect?
There are two ways to cause problems for the defense, and the first one is to select the government that destroys the defense. The second one is to make some kinds of sabotage into the military systems. But the government that dispands military is one of the versions of the governments that are making defense impossible.
And there are two ways to make that thing. The first one is to cause civil disorder, and the second is to take out the willingness to defend own country. The thing that destroys the willingness to defend own country is the government that dissociates some groups. That thing makes those groups good targets for enemy propaganda.
The idea is that a cyber attack that rises the non-democratic powers in power would cause a situation, where the nation's defense is in trouble. Another way to make an indirect attack is to make the generals and other decision-makers select the wrong equipment for the military and police. One of those ways to destroy the defense is just to stay alone against a superior enemy. In that case, the superior enemy convinces that the benefit of a small nation is to stay alone. And then in one day, the tanks will cross the border.
Comments
Post a Comment